None of the homophobes will answer the question as to what homosexuality does them personally and how it harms them. They start the personal attacks at that point.
Last edited:
118 visits to WH
- Thread starter Cancel 2016.2
- Start date
None of the homophobes will answer the question as to what homosexuality does them personally and how it harms them. They start the personal attacks at that point.
Most of them are in the closet, it's a way for them to discuss man sex!
maineman
Banned
and when they start, their rate of posting slows down.... Cuz they're typin' with just one hand!
His day was ruined, I suspect Supercandy wont be coming here anytime soon and demanding that we stay on topic again.
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
I kinda feel bad for him now Jarod. I don't have that killer instinct in me. When I see him down on the ground like this, mewling and embarrassed, I have to let up on him. Sure he wouldn't do the same for me, but i have a softer heart than he does.
dixon76710
New member
I don't want to track down the congressional report recently released. I've quoted and linked to it before. At the time of
the study, there were something like 70 out of the 200 groups looked at in the study, still 70 had not yet been granted
501 c status. 3 years was the highest in duration of those who were still waiting for an IRS decision.
The guy is a buffoon, but I do feel sorry for him today.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
I suspect you will continue to pretend that by showing the ONE to be wrong that somehow means the other 117 are as well.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Garud, do you really think anyone believes you are more intelligent than I am? You truly are retarded if you think showing the one visit was a large social event means there is nothing to what was stated in the OP.
Tell us Garud, can you explain the 50+ visits to Fenn? What does she do again?
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
Why should he have to explain "the 50 visits?"
Do you think they met 50 times to talk about targeting conservative groups? Oh, wait - don't answer that. One would have to be a "hack" to think they didn't, according to you.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
LMAO... you don't need to feel bad... unless you want to feel bad for the Obama apologists. All of whom are willing to use 1 of 118 visits as evidence the other 117 are also innocent.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Which brings us back to the point of the thread... WHY was the head of the IRS at the WH that much?
It is not to meet 'mostly' on healthcare as Dung proclaimed... though 38 of the visits were on health care.
But 54 visits were with someone working on Ethics... I would like to know what those were about.
LOL. Says the guy who convicted the previous President without the "proven guilty" part...
LOL. Says the guy who convicted the previous President without the "proven guilty" part...
LOL. Sarah Fenn is DeParle's special assistant, you collosal twit. Go to the visitor logs and look at the descriptions in 2010 for his meetings with Fenn. It's a regular meeting that grew to about 60 people (from about 20) to deal with Healthcare Reform. In 2011, the record-keeping got a little less descriptive and the meetings with Fenn are simply described as "Meeting" but by all appearances its the same meeting of about 60 people.
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
I do though. I bet you had to take some "liquid courage" last night in order to return here today.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Yes, it was just that record keeping got less descriptive. Of course. I see it now.
The description just went from the topic of 'health care' to 'meeting' because all DeParle's and Fenn's time is spent on health care and so it was assumed.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Feel bad for the apologists. You sure seem to have weird coping mechanisms, try not to assign your methods to me.