The only deceit here is your intellectual dishonesty when trying to argue against a return to the tax policies pre-Reagan.
You sought to make your argument by simply adjusting everything for inflation, which is the laziest fucking way possible to do it, not to mention the most innacurate.
You tried to apply 1980's rates to 1980's incomes by using an inflation multiplier.
That's not how you can accurately determine what the revenue would be using 1980's rates applied to 2019 income.
Laziness is your dominant character trait.
By you using only an inflation multiplier? How so? The distribution of income in 2019 isn't the same as it was in 1980, and you know that. So you're choosing to omit that from your argument for the simplicity of just multiplying everything in 1980 by the same inflation multiplier.
Which is not the way to determine tax liability using 1980's policy applied to 2019 incomes.
So we must ask the question; why are you doing it that way?
The answer is because you don't know any other way to do it because no one taught you.
It is not my fault that you do not understand the meaning of terms.
Hey, I asked you to provide specifics as to what you would want the rates and income brackets to look like. All you said was "Go back to the fiscal policy of 1980". You said that was specific enough. So I used the the same exact income brackets and tax rates for 1980 and adjusted them for inflation just like you asked.
Well, then if you don't like the way I am doing it you can provide your OWN income levels to those same tax brackets.
Well, then if you don't like the way I am doing it you can provide your OWN income levels to those same tax brackets. Otherwise you can go fuck yourself Toby. You aren't smart enough to be a house negro. You will always be in the fields
It is what I have said throughout Trump. Doesn't change that a lot of people have a lot of money in them to the point they are about a 6th of the US stock market's value. It is also why privatizing social security would be a mistake, but whatevers. Considering how many pension plans have gone belly up, an inflated value 401K is still better than an "Oops sorry you didn't retire before the thing went insolvent so this letter is all you are getting" letter from PBGC.
So after lazily making an argument you couldn't defend, you demand I accommodate you?
Go fuck yourself.
Hey, I asked you to provide specifics as to what you would want the rates and income brackets to look like. All you said was "Go back to the fiscal policy of 1980". You said that was specific enough. So I used the the same exact income brackets and tax rates for 1980 and adjusted them for inflation just like you asked.
Pension plans have gone belly-up?
Not at all.
Well, then if you don't like the way I am doing i
You are the one arguing for a different way of presenting the data. You go do it then.
Look I know you have benefitted from affirmative action your entire life and are used to using white guilt to get your way. But there are no short cuts with me Toby.
If you have a better way to present the data, I suggest you do so. Or you can go fuck yourself in the back of the bus
LOL. It is why they are desperately trying to get the multi-employer pension act reform pushed through congress. Current law allows them to say "Sucks to be you"
No. How about YOU DO IT THE ACCURATE AND CORRECT WAY THE FIRST TIME instead of trying to establish bullshit as credibility.
You took the shortcut yourself, you lazy prick, when you just used an inflation multiplier.
So your style of debate seems to be to commit yourself to bad faith, then accuse others of doing what you just did.
LOL. It is why they are desperately trying to get the multi-employer pension act reform pushed through congress. Current law allows them to say "Sucks to be you"
I am not your negro Toby. My way is perfectly fine. Go fuck yourself in the back of the bus
My way is perfectly fine.