SmarterthanYou
rebel
isn't that the point of committing suicide??Gun shots are almost always fatal so no time to reconsider and not much anyone can do to save your life if they find you in time.
isn't that the point of committing suicide??Gun shots are almost always fatal so no time to reconsider and not much anyone can do to save your life if they find you in time.
Nope it's a suicide, it is unrelated to the issue of "gun violence:
There are 310 million guns in civilian hands in this country. a ban would do nothing. Are you for sending men with guns to take away these 310 million guns? We know you won't go, you'll send someone elses son.
yes, horrific events. Tell me what you propose and how it would have stopped any of these.
I have plenty, you have pouting, tears, and mindless parroting...
Methodly is very important. Gun shots are almost always fatal so no time to reconsider and not much anyone can do to save your life if they find you in time. Taking pills gives you a chance to be found and stomach pumped. Same with slashing your wrist or some other attempt. A gun shot gives little chance for a rethink on your choice.
Quick and painless. Isn't that the point? ... you must be a woman.
How many people are killed by "pills" each year?
Jumping off a tall building or cliff (in the realm of what you call "some other method") gives you little chance to re-think your choice as well. There are other "choices" also.Methodly is very important. Gun shots are almost always fatal so no time to reconsider and not much anyone can do to save your life if they find you in time. Taking pills gives you a chance to be found and stomach pumped. Same with slashing your wrist or some other attempt. A gun shot gives little chance for a rethink on your choice.
The point is, not everyone who is considering suicide actually wants to die but are in a downward spiral/moment in which pills or something less lethal might allow their lives to be saved and potentially changed while a gun shot most likely will not. Do you believe anyone who considers suicide should be successful at it?
Methodly is very important. Gun shots are almost always fatal so no time to reconsider and not much anyone can do to save your life if they find you in time. Taking pills gives you a chance to be found and stomach pumped. Same with slashing your wrist or some other attempt. A gun shot gives little chance for a rethink on your choice.
Obviously, you’ve never seen a gun suicide. Yeah, pal, they’re violent.
There you go with your bullshit “would” again.
I gave you the proposal to stop future Sandy Hooks and Las Vegas. Literacy is not your strong suit.
No you didn't why lie? I know you are angry, and rather coddled but lets have an adult conversation here.
Jumping off a building is "violent"
drowning is "Violent". etc.
You've seen a gun suicide?
The point is, not everyone who is considering suicide actually wants to die but are in a downward spiral/moment in which pills or something less lethal might allow their lives to be saved and potentially changed while a gun shot most likely will not. Do you believe anyone who considers suicide should be successful at it?
Yeah, I did, punk. That you can’t follow is your problem.
What about buildings and drownings? WTF does that have to do with guns?
Plenty.
You have a right under the second amendment to own arms.
An AR-15 is an arm in common use.
So the answer to your question is yes.
Jumping off a tall building or cliff (in the realm of what you call "some other method") gives you little chance to re-think your choice as well. There are other "choices" also.
If they don't "actually want to die", they're not considering suicide. It's called getting attention.
You are completely and totally wrong.
And without guns it still will be the same outcome.True but this discussion is about guns.
True but this discussion is about guns.