1984 and school walkouts

Naa just around 3 or 4 will make me happy.

Let's start Local ... like around here.

so you only want to see 3 or 4 around here (this forum) killed by government? and if there were others out there, say like 8 or 9 in your own community, that would be too many for you to start after their guns?
 
so you only want to see 3 or 4 around here (this forum) killed by government? and if there were others out there, say like 8 or 9 in your own community, that would be too many for you to start after their guns?


Oh no ... I can take care of my own business if I need to.
 
You have to know why you believe what you believe if you're going to stand up. Many did not and were only doing what their friends did who also had no clue other than what they've seen the gut haters whine about.

As for the consequences, don't believe that. I have a neighbor whose dumbass daughter was fooled into believing the gun haters bullshit. She walked out and will be suspended for it. Her whiny ass mother has been all over Facebook complaining about it.

Interesting how you personally know what every kid was thinking, or not thinking, who protested. Did your magic 8 ball clue you in. Even if they were following the crowd, would it be the first time or will it be the last time teenagers do that? I'm sure you followed a crowd or two when you were young and if you deny it then you are a liar. Now whether or not they mature and change their position, whatever that position is, over time remains to be seen. Teenagers only follow the crowd for so long.
 
how many lives are worth it to you? how many people are you willing to see die to obtain your objective?

Should the number of lives equal student lives, more, less...? What number is the right number, or wrong number, of lives in your opinion? People are already losing their lives to guns, what's a few more?
 
not a relevant question.

You believe lives will be lost if guns are taken by the govt but lives are already being lost to guns. How many is too many, in your opinion? What difference does it make if lives are lost in general or lives are lost when the govt takes action? Lives are still lost.
 
You believe lives will be lost if guns are taken by the govt but lives are already being lost to guns. How many is too many, in your opinion? What difference does it make if lives are lost in general or lives are lost when the govt takes action? Lives are still lost.

that is the price of freedom. the founders knew these things. I do believe lives will be lost if the government attempts to take guns. I believe that number will be in the millions. the number of lives being lost now is not, nor ever will be, my responsibility but lies in the hands of those who demand that people have no gun zones in their areas.
 
Interesting how you personally know what every kid was thinking, or not thinking, who protested. Did your magic 8 ball clue you in. Even if they were following the crowd, would it be the first time or will it be the last time teenagers do that? I'm sure you followed a crowd or two when you were young and if you deny it then you are a liar. Now whether or not they mature and change their position, whatever that position is, over time remains to be seen. Teenagers only follow the crowd for so long.

Since you didn't know me when I was younger, making any statement about what I did or why I did it makes you a fucking idiot.

While it's impossible to know what EVERY one was thinking, it's easy to know the general mindset. It's the same type of thing used when polls are done and the findings are reported. Not everyone is polled but enough is done to determine things.

Many of the teenagers today can be so easily fooled with nonsense like the gun haters are spreading, it's safe to say many will never change and mature to think for themselves. That's the way your kind like it. Keep them stupid and you can control them.
 
You believe lives will be lost if guns are taken by the govt but lives are already being lost to guns. How many is too many, in your opinion? What difference does it make if lives are lost in general or lives are lost when the govt takes action? Lives are still lost.

Not one life has been lost to a gun. If, as you claim, they have, why hasn't a single gun been put on trial for taking those lives?
 
Should the number of lives equal student lives, more, less...? What number is the right number, or wrong number, of lives in your opinion? People are already losing their lives to guns, what's a few more?

When are all these guns you claim are taking lives going on trial? Why do we try a person when a murder is committed. Why don't we try what they used to commit the murder instead of (fill in the blank) if the tool used by the killer is causing the problem?
 
Back
Top