2016 - Presidental Race...

Dixie said:
Look you little fucking twit, I just told you that the GOP needs to stop playing the liberal's game and start popping you idiots in the kisser... now you want me to run play the liberal's game? No, I am not posting links to sites for citation purposes, if that was what your illiterate ass was asking for. If you want to search the Internets for information, I suggest Google.

FUCK YOU!
Click to expand...


ROTFLMAO, Col. West gets DISCHARGED by the voters of my district and Dixie gets Mad... Thats okay, if it makes you feel a bit better go ahead and claim voter fraud (without even a shread of evidence or any cites). Its okay Dixie, you will feel better in the morning. Just keep using that Republican Math and science they taught you in Alabama.
 
Dixie said:
I hope the fuck they do, and then I hope they shove your size 10 sneaker down your throat and marginalize you, like your scumbucket ass deserves. I want to see them stomp your ass on a daily basis, with your own stupid words and your own idiotic arguments, relentlessly... day after day... pound, pound, pound! Every time a microphone or camera is around, I want them popping you in your clown nose, repeatedly and hard, and when you eventually go retreating away, hunting you down and popping you some more! Instead of "taking the high road" and not criticizing you on foreign policy FAILURES in Libya, I want them crucifying you over it every time they speak! Instead of letting you dance away from FAILURE of Federal response to hurricanes, I want them to pound you in the kisser daily with what a FAILURE your plan was. Every time the mic is hot, I want them in your face, showing America what a bunch of incompetent idiots you are, and not allow one second to go by that they aren't on your ass, night and day, without pause. And when you are eventually begging and pleading and pulling the old "can't we all just get along" routine, fucking POUND YOUR FACE IN AGAIN! FUCK YOU!
Click to expand...

I might print that and frame it under a quote, "2012, Carters Revenge"
 
Jarod said:
ROTFLMAO, Col. West gets DISCHARGED by the voters of my district and Dixie gets Mad... Thats okay, if it makes you feel a bit better go ahead and claim voter fraud (without even a shread of evidence or any cites). Its okay Dixie, you will feel better in the morning. Just keep using that Republican Math and science they taught you in Alabama.
Click to expand...

:fu:
 
Col. West has been Dishonorably Discharged, by the people.


Dixie PISSED! Sounds like a good day for AMERICA!

Win one for the good guys.
 
Jarod said:
I dont see where he assumed that.
Click to expand...

Because you make a deliberate choice to "miss" it because you think his opinion is a match to yours. Tell me where he said anything about the qualifications of the Senator that was in any way different than pigmentation and you may have a point, otherwise it is my considered opinion that you are being deliberately disingenuous to yourself and others. Lying to yourself in an attempt to find "allies" for a poor opinion doesn't make the opinion in any way right.

I would vote for Rubio because the policy he proposes agrees with the policy I believe should be implemented, not because I think he'd "get us some Mexican votes." Just like I don't vote for Obama because I believe his policy is the wrong approach, not because I think it will get us more "minority votes" or because I don't like minorities.

The suggestion that the only reason, as he did suggest there, that we would nominate Rubio is that we somehow "think" that it will get us "minority votes" is nonsense.
 
Jarod said:
Today I'm watching "Morning Joe" and I am realizing that Chris Christy is running for the Republican nomination and started three weeks ago. So, as of today it looks like it will be Christy v. Clinton.


Any other predictions?
Click to expand...
NO, not after his Hurricane Sandy Obama ass kissing. I want Mitt Romney to run again, this time with Marco Rubio. Nixon lost to Kennedy, ran for Governor, then came back and won the Presidency in 68. Reagan ran and lost the Primary and the rest is history. After the illegal Latino non citizens voting is curtailed and with Rubio on the ticket, along with Obama's perceived screw up of the next 4 years, we will win easily.
 
SJJRSJJS said:
NO, not after his Hurricane Sandy Obama ass kissing. I want Mitt Romney to run again, this time with Marco Rubio. Nixon lost to Kennedy, ran for Governor, then came back and won the Presidency in 68. Reagan ran and lost the Primary and the rest is history. After the illegal Latino non citizens voting is curtailed and with Rubio on the ticket, along with Obama's perceived screw up of the next 4 years, we will win easily.
Click to expand...

Nixon was a former VP, and Reagan lost the primary while Romney won the primary and lost the general. Romney will never run for political office again, that's my guess. I like Marco Rubio, but in my opinion, he wouldn't have helped Romney any more than Ryan. I liked Romney, he just wasn't a conservative. The fact that the GOP ran with a moderate in a campaign that tried to avoid being nasty, against an opponent with every intention of doing whatever it took to win, was what cost them the election.

What will win easily, is someone who delivers a solid conservative message with passion and conviction. Mitt couldn't pull that off, try as he might, he is just not a conservative. The challenge is a little more daunting than you imagine here, because the solid conservative candidate is not going to have a microphone, his message is going to be distorted and exploited by the mainstream media, and the liberals are going to cheat, lie, steal, and pull whatever Tanya Harding tricks they can to win. I think the key to victory is having a conservative candidate who can articulate a principled message, and at the same time, pop the liberals in the mouth unabashedly. At one point, I thought Krispy Kreme might be the one who could do that, I also think Newt Gingrich could have done it 12 years ago, but both have done things that changed my mind. Again, the two people I see out there, who have this potential, are Alan West and Sarah Palin. Now, will it be those two? Probably not, but it needs to be someone LIKE them, and could that be Marco Rubio or Bobby Jindal? Who knows? One thing it won't be, and we know this for certain, it won't be a John McCain or Mitt Romney. It has to be a conservative.
 
Damocles said:
Because you make a deliberate choice to "miss" it because you think his opinion is a match to yours. Tell me where he said anything about the qualifications of the Senator that was in any way different than pigmentation and you may have a point, otherwise it is my considered opinion that you are being deliberately disingenuous to yourself and others. Lying to yourself in an attempt to find "allies" for a poor opinion doesn't make the opinion in any way right.

I would vote for Rubio because the policy he proposes agrees with the policy I believe should be implemented, not because I think he'd "get us some Mexican votes." Just like I don't vote for Obama because I believe his policy is the wrong approach, not because I think it will get us more "minority votes" or because I don't like minorities.

The suggestion that the only reason, as he did suggest there, that we would nominate Rubio is that we somehow "think" that it will get us "minority votes" is nonsense.
Click to expand...

I understand what you are saying, but I belive you are READING way too much into what he said. You do that in discussions often.
 
Dixie said:
Nixon was a former VP, and Reagan lost the primary while Romney won the primary and lost the general. Romney will never run for political office again, that's my guess. I like Marco Rubio, but in my opinion, he wouldn't have helped Romney any more than Ryan. I liked Romney, he just wasn't a conservative. The fact that the GOP ran with a moderate in a campaign that tried to avoid being nasty, against an opponent with every intention of doing whatever it took to win, was what cost them the election.

What will win easily, is someone who delivers a solid conservative message with passion and conviction. Mitt couldn't pull that off, try as he might, he is just not a conservative. The challenge is a little more daunting than you imagine here, because the solid conservative candidate is not going to have a microphone, his message is going to be distorted and exploited by the mainstream media, and the liberals are going to cheat, lie, steal, and pull whatever Tanya Harding tricks they can to win. I think the key to victory is having a conservative candidate who can articulate a principled message, and at the same time, pop the liberals in the mouth unabashedly. At one point, I thought Krispy Kreme might be the one who could do that, I also think Newt Gingrich could have done it 12 years ago, but both have done things that changed my mind. Again, the two people I see out there, who have this potential, are Alan West and Sarah Palin. Now, will it be those two? Probably not, but it needs to be someone LIKE them, and could that be Marco Rubio or Bobby Jindal? Who knows? One thing it won't be, and we know this for certain, it won't be a John McCain or Mitt Romney. It has to be a conservative.
Click to expand...

Allan West could not even get reelected to congress! You think he will get elected President? You must still be using Republian Math. I hope they will nominate West, or Palin. Rubio has already started with the pander game by trying to have it both ways on evolution.
 
Jarod said:
Allan West could not even get reelected to congress! You think he will get elected President? You must still be using Republian Math. I hope they will nominate West, or Palin. Rubio has already started with the pander game by trying to have it both ways on evolution.
Click to expand...

Had his district remain unchanged from his last election, he would have garnered about 70% of the vote. As it stood, after Democrats gerrymandered his district and stuffed ballot boxes, and voted for the family dog, he lost by a few dangling chads. But the main thing is, West does not have to impress you with his political election-winning skills to qualify or garner conservative support. We really do not care what you think of West, and it will have absolutely no effect on our choice. In fact, the idea that you don't think West is qualified, actually adds a few more points to his favor, in my opinion. Even MORE the reason to nominate him... they don't think he's "suitable!"

Let's see you tap dance around that one!
 
Dixie said:
Had his district remain unchanged from his last election, he would have garnered about 70% of the vote. As it stood, after Democrats gerrymandered his district and stuffed ballot boxes, and voted for the family dog, he lost by a few dangling chads. But the main thing is, West does not have to impress you with his political election-winning skills to qualify or garner conservative support. We really do not care what you think of West, and it will have absolutely no effect on our choice. In fact, the idea that you don't think West is qualified, actually adds a few more points to his favor, in my opinion. Even MORE the reason to nominate him... they don't think he's "suitable!"

Let's see you tap dance around that one!
Click to expand...
Democrats gerrymandered West? Really? You should look at who did the Gerrymandering, HINT: Florida has an all Republcan Congress and Governor! ROTFlMAO!
 
Jarod said:
Democrats gerrymandered West? Really? You should look at who did the Gerrymandering, HINT: Florida has an all Republcan Congress and Governor! ROTFlMAO!
Click to expand...

LOL... So you think there are no Democrats in the Florida legislature? And what does the governor have to do with voting districts? Finally, one more thing about Florida "republicans" ...Charlie Crist. The legislature DID IN FACT redistrict Congressman West's district. So the "he couldn't even get re-elected" argument is null and void. Virtually no one can win re-election when you gerrymander their district against them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top