40 more years of oil at current consumption rates.

spinner, You are an oily kind of guy and you claim to be into finiances and such.
An honest question.
What will happen to the price of oil when demand outstrips availability from the ground ?
 
I just wanted to hear the "expert" say it among his greedy exhaultations Damo.
I figure after the demand outstrips the supply we would be glad to get $5/gal gas.
According to the article that is less than 5 years away....

This is a biggie. It will effect everyone regardless of political party .....
 
Last edited:
Cypress said:
"Just one example Cypress... but this is just to show you that it can be done without much involvment from government funding"

From their own website:



Ummmm....SF? the University of Texas is a publicly funded educational and research institution

http://www.mdanderson.org/About_MDA...7845-11D4-AEC300508BDCCE3A&method=displayFull


According to Wiki, M.D. Anderson was created by an Act by congress, and the Texas state legislature. It is also the number one recipient of grants from the National Cancer Institute.
Click to expand...


Hey Tax, from the bottom of my heart F U, Vince Young and UT. Seriously, Tax, F U.
 
Ohh USC the price will (not would) go up so high $5 gal will look cheap. You a small man grasshopper. I've taught and you have barely learned.
Oil is way to cheap now,:tongout:
 
Topspin said:
Ohh USC the price will (not would) go up so high $5 gal will look cheap. You a small man grasshopper. I've taught and you have barely learned.
Oil is way to cheap now,:tongout:
Click to expand...

Top, what is the deal with you? You just live to aggravate people don't you? I was reading a thread on the other board yesterday, and saw you about give Superfreak a stroke. And you made some great points about health care deficit spending vs war deficit spending.

Then you come here and never talk about the war or about health care, but try to drive usc round the bend. I think you just like to upset and annoy people. And if you're going to give SF high blood pressure, why not do it here, so I don't end up missing it.
 
Darla, I'm an oddball. I offer the following
1. I only razz them with they attack me personally first, I like to keep it on the issues but never claimed to be mature. If they want sophmoric barbs I'm in.
2. I'm sure I'm the only poster on either board pro Opec. Heck I'm an oil man of course I want a fair and high price for my product.
3. I'm a moderate dem fit no mold. Turbo-lib on social issues like legalizing pot and not putting teenagers in jail for it while we let murders out for overcrowding. I'm left of everyone on the war.
But conversly I'm very pro business and investor and low taxes. I have seen the result of education making it easy to get rich and think we should do much more to Make higher education avail to all classes even doubling up on medical school admins.
 
Darla, you seem to have an odd idea as to what a stroke is. Given that I think I have only posted on a couple of threads on the other board lately and that I don't normally disagree with top, then I assume you are talking about his assertation that the markets "do better under Dems" comment???

Did you happen to read why he is wrong on that?

He got pissed because he thinks Hillary is similar to Bill on the political spectrum and I said she was a lot further left than Bill was.
 
Superfreak said:
Darla, you seem to have an odd idea as to what a stroke is. Given that I think I have only posted on a couple of threads on the other board lately and that I don't normally disagree with top, then I assume you are talking about his assertation that the markets "do better under Dems" comment???

Did you happen to read why he is wrong on that?

He got pissed because he thinks Hillary is similar to Bill on the political spectrum and I said she was a lot further left than Bill was.
Click to expand...

LOL. You sounded pretty pissed yourself, and I have to say SF, no way is Hillary to the left, but that's a conversation going on in another thread, and no point starting it here.

I wasn't insulting you, I just thought the whole thing was funny.
 
Darla... to the left of BILL.... and she is pretty far to the left despite her recent attempts to paint herself as a moderate. That said, she is not as far left as an Edwards and most certainly not Kucinich.

awww... screw it... lets just talk about it here.... no need for a new thread. All we have to do is....

:hij:
 
Superfreak said:
Darla... to the left of BILL.... and she is pretty far to the left despite her recent attempts to paint herself as a moderate. That said, she is not as far left as an Edwards and most certainly not Kucinich.

awww... screw it... lets just talk about it here.... no need for a new thread. All we have to do is....

:hij:
Click to expand...

Can you give me one example of something she is to the left of Bill Clinton on?
 
USC I have some uneducated laborers working on the street that remind me of you too.

Oil is going way higher folks, we might see $2.00 gal briefly but I'm convinced we'll see $5 as well. Read up on China's auto sales.:clink:
 
there are many reasons as you know SF, I'm going on funimentals 99.9% and .1% on this dem vs Repub debate
 
USC I have some uneducated laborers working on the street that remind me of you too.

Poor spinner, you do not realize that an education does not a good person make.

Those uneducated laborers on the street work for you ?
Or is this some of your defeciency of your education showing ?

I really don't give a big rats ass what an elitist prick like you thinks spinner.
I deal with people not status symbols.
 
I think you a good guy usc just not must formal or any other kind of education.
You must care what I think a little, you keep coming back with your trailor trash eduction and throwing firecrackers and getting granades tossed back at you.
The mind is a terrible thing to waist, in your case it's just a terrible thing.:pke:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top