42% of likely US voters think that the election was rigged

Curious as to why you wouldn't want to prove that in a public forum.

:tardthoughts:

Because it has been. The large number of audits and recounts, both automated and by hand, provided no evidence at all of electoral fraud on a level that could swing an election. In fact the data demonstrated the reverse. That incidents of electoral fraud hardly occurred at all.

So this is a public forum. Go ahead and show us. What proof do you have?
 
Fine. Please do exactly that. Put the evidence you have up on the table and show us what you have.

I haven’t gone over the thousand or so sworn affidavits which testify to fraud so I can’t very well ‘lay it in the table’. Have you gone over them?

The point is nearly half the country is suspicious of the outcome *and that fact alone* should be sufficient for an independent investigation of it.

The country spent three years investigating the Russian hoax and it was tied to the election of 2016 so I don’t think it’s an unreasonable request in light of that.

Besides, Democrats have nothing to lose, right?
 
In Iran, foreign interference destroyed democracy and made the Shah Fuhrer, but didn't feel it could ban religion, so the only answer seemed to be to work through the mosque, giving the result we see. In the US McCarthyism banned the majority from even thinking about the real answers to their economic problems, leading to a fall in working people's real incomes, so ultimately they turned away from any logic at all and went for an incompetent nazi Fuhrer, believing in his nonsense totally, since they were denied any freedom of thought, giving the results we see in whole sections of the country. The Iran regime is far more difficult to get rid of, but probably a lot more of the Iranian people can see what they really want. Good luck to all thinking people, whatever.
 
https://www.rasmussenreports.com/pu...rs_still_don_t_think_biden_was_elected_fairly

Yet the Democrats aren't interested in exploring the evidence. They just repeat the DNC narrative that there is no evidence. If they are so convinced it wasn't rigged, then why wouldn't they want to prove to 42% of likely voters that it wasn't?

:tardthoughts:

Thanks for the link. Lots of data there.

4yd6lu.jpg
 
We’ll probably because yours (and theirs) reasoning is illogical as hell.

The vast preponderance of evidence indicates that any incidents of electoral fraud were so small and so few as to be statistically insignificant let alone being of the scale required to swing an election.

So that being the case then no one is under any reasonable obligation to explore anything with you. Rather the burden of proof is yours to provide evidence that it did occur given all the available evidence indicates it did not.

So please provide us the objective and independently verifiable evidence that it did as we are under no obligation whatsoever to prove the converse. You are. Once you do then we can have a discussion and until you do there is nothing to discuss. Otherwise there is no basis on your behalf to even have a reasonable, rational and factual discussion as unless you meet the factual burden of proof.

The ball is in your court pal. Where’s the beef?

Let's see the Dominion software.
 
I haven’t gone over the thousand or so sworn affidavits which testify to fraud so I can’t very well ‘lay it in the table’. Have you gone over them?

The point is nearly half the country is suspicious of the outcome *and that fact alone* should be sufficient for an independent investigation of it.

The country spent three years investigating the Russian hoax and it was tied to the election of 2016 so I don’t think it’s an unreasonable request in light of that.

Besides, Democrats have nothing to lose, right?

So in other words you have no evidence and you want me to provide it for you?

That’s not how it works. The burden of proof is yours. Show me your evidence.
 
So in other words you have no evidence and you want me to provide it for you?

That’s not how it works. The burden of proof is yours. Show me your evidence.

My ‘evidence’ the fact nearly half the country is suspicious of the election outcome.

That alone, should be sufficient justification for further investigation. People are being dissuaded from voting in the future because they think the deck is stacked for Democrats. Just last week an article came out in Time magazine about how a ‘cabal’ ran a covert campaign that fortified the election in favor of Biden.

Some would call that domestic election meddling. These people don’t need Trump to tell them anything when democrats are doing the talking about what went on.
 
So you call a link to a propaganda outlet evidence? That’s not evidence that’s an opinion. Show me the factual, independently verifiable evidence. That’s not asking to much. I’m not interested in opinion.

There's the good ol' Moot, attacking the messenger.

:smh:
 
It's always up to the one asserting a claim to show why it's true, to supply persuasive evidence of that truth. Trump's side went at this for months, filing more than 40 law suits,
making media allegations now the subject of libel suits. It has all amounted to nothing in the way of proof but the assertions have gotten people killed and caused havoc in the society.

As for Rasmussen, a Republican oriented "pollster", forget it.
 
https://www.rasmussenreports.com/pu...rs_still_don_t_think_biden_was_elected_fairly

Yet the Democrats aren't interested in exploring the evidence. They just repeat the DNC narrative that there is no evidence. If they are so convinced it wasn't rigged, then why wouldn't they want to prove to 42% of likely voters that it wasn't?

:tardthoughts:

While
65% of voters believe the 2020 election was free and fair
https://morningconsult.com/form/tracking-voter-trust-in-elections/
 
My ‘evidence’ the fact nearly half the country is suspicious of the election outcome.

That alone, should be sufficient justification for further investigation. People are being dissuaded from voting in the future because they think the deck is stacked for Democrats. Just last week an article came out in Time magazine about how a ‘cabal’ ran a covert campaign that fortified the election in favor of Biden.

Some would call that domestic election meddling. These people don’t need Trump to tell them anything when democrats are doing the talking about what went on.

As we all know, fascist regimes brainwash the mugs. Once upon a time the majority of people believed in witches. That was because they were manipulated arseholes who hadn't got a notion of reality. Is that what you want to be?
 
As we all know, fascist regimes brainwash the mugs. Once upon a time the majority of people believed in witches. That was because they were manipulated arseholes who hadn't got a notion of reality. Is that what you want to be?

A significant number of Biden voters were kept in the dark about Hunter Biden’s hard drive by fascist manipulation of the media.

“Democracy dies in darkness” is the motto of Jeff Bezos’ fish wrapper, WashPO.
 
A significant number of Biden voters were kept in the dark about Hunter Biden’s hard drive by fascist manipulation of the media.

“Democracy dies in darkness” is the motto of Jeff Bezos’ fish wrapper, WashPO.

That's just noise. When was Hunter Biden elected to what?
 
Back
Top