86 year old man who shot black thug trying to break into house charged with TWO FELONIES.

[Text Drivers are Killers]

There is no evidence for the story that the kid mistakenly went to the wrong house. The lawyers made that up. This was an attempted burglary. The black "victim" has collected $3.4 million so far.

nov 28 2024 An 86-year-old white man accused of shooting a Black teenager who mistakenly rang the wrong home's doorbell in Kansas City is set to face a jury trial.

A Missouri judge ruled Tuesday that Andrew Lester is fit for trial for the 2023 shooting of Ralph Yarl, then 16. In an affidavit in September, Lester faces two felony counts of first-degree assault and armed criminal action. Through a GoFundMe, his family raised over $3.4 million to help with his medical bills and therapy, including for a traumatic brain injury

On April 13, 2023, Yarl, a high school junior, went to pick up his younger twin brothers from their friend's house. He mistakenly rang the wrong doorbell.

Yarl told police he pressed the doorbell and waited outside the front door. The person inside took a long time to respond but opened the door holding a firearm. Yarl said he didn’t pull on the door, and it was his first time coming to the home. No words were exchanged between the two. Lester shot through the glass door, hitting Yarl in the forehead and right arm, according to police records.

MSN

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Do you have any evidence that Ralph Yarl had either gang or previous criminal activity?

 

[Walt]

There is no evidence for the story that the kid mistakenly went to the wrong house.

So let me understand this, he was going to pickup his brother, but there is no evidence his brother even exists? That should be an easy case then. Somehow I think you are lying.

break into house...​

This was an attempted burglary.

The kid rang the front door bell. That is not breaking into the house, nor attempted burglary.

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

Do you have any evidence that Ralph Yarl had either gang or previous criminal activity?

Who knows? The cops and media refused to investigate ralphy.

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

And still nothing done to the black cop who shot unarmed white girl ashli babbitt at J6. Never charged. Not even fired.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

So let me understand this, he was going to pickup his brother, but there is no evidence his brother even exists? That should be an easy case then. Somehow I think you are lying.


The kid rang the front door bell. That is not breaking into the house, nor attempted burglary.

I looked into the kid's background. Was an honor student with a good GPA. Interest in science and wanted to go to Texas A&M. No past criminal history or history of gang involvement.

Yes, he has a brother. This is on the old guy answering the door with a gun and firing through it on the kid without provocation.

 

[Walt]

I looked into the kid's background. Was an honor student with a good GPA. Interest in science and wanted to go to Texas A&M. No past criminal history or history of gang involvement.

Yes, he has a brother. This is on the old guy answering the door with a gun and firing through it on the kid without provocation.

Blacks have as much right to ring a doorbell as anyone else.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

And still nothing done to the black cop who shot unarmed white girl ashli babbitt at J6. Never charged. Not even fired.

There it is. Off into the weeds!

MAGAt rule #4 When the conversation isn't going your way, change the subject.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Blacks have as much right to ring a doorbell as anyone else.

I agree, and they should have the expectation of not being shot by the homeowner for simply standing on their front porch.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

There it is. Off into the weeds!

MAGAt rule #4 When the conversation isn't going your way, change the subject.

You know I have the opinion that Officer Byrd should have been charged with a felony for that and fired, but that's for a different thread.

 

[RB 60]

You know I have the opinion that Officer Byrd should have been charged with a felony for that and fired, but that's for a different thread.

The homeowner overreacted. with a firearm. Same with Officer Byrd. Who's getting charged with a crime? Who should?

 

[T. A. Gardner]

The homeowner overreacted. with a firearm. Same with Officer Byrd. Who's getting charged with a crime? Who should?

A homeowner isn't a professional and trained in the use of force. A police officer is. Byrd was a Lieutenant on the Capitol Police force. He had years of training, and those years obviously didn't sink in. He had a history of being a fuck up too.

Byrd deserved to be charged far more than some idiot homeowner.

 

[RB 60]

A homeowner isn't a professional and trained in the use of force. A police officer is. Byrd was a Lieutenant on the Capitol Police force. He had years of training, and those years obviously didn't sink in. He had a history of being a fuck up too.

Byrd deserved to be charged far more than some idiot homeowner.

Yes, a police officer should be trained on when to use deadly force.
One officer, of many, fired one round into a crowd of people.

The homeowner shot someone for ringing his boor bell.

Yeah, homeowner should be hammered, Byrd should be hammered harder.

 

[Walt]

The homeowner overreacted. with a firearm. Same with Officer Byrd. Who's getting charged with a crime? Who should?

The kid was ringing a doorbell, completely legal. The terrorist was attacking a vital function of government, and refusing to follow orders of law enforcement.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

You know I have the opinion that Officer Byrd should have been charged with a felony for that and fired, but that's for a different thread.

No doubt you'd feel different had he been white and the offender been a black male, veteran or not.

 

[Diesel]

I looked into the kid's background. Was an honor student with a good GPA. Interest in science and wanted to go to Texas A&M. No past criminal history or history of gang involvement.

Yes, he has a brother. This is on the old guy answering the door with a gun and firing through it on the kid without provocation.

There are 32 credible citations on the Wiki page. As usual, every word of TDAK's post is a lie. He opened his one millionth untrue thread to demonstrate his boundless racial hatred.

Shooting of Ralph Yarl - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Diesel]

Blacks have as much right to ring a doorbell as anyone else.

Not if they don't want to get shot by an ancient, white racist! At least this 86-year-old had terrible aim and wasn't able to kill the victim with 2 shots at point blank range.

 

[Jarod]

OP is a lie, it’s not a crime to ring someone’s doorbell.

 

[Diesel]

I should have kept reading. This is just another useless rant about Babbitt and Byrd.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

The kid was ringing a doorbell, completely legal. The terrorist was attacking a vital function of government, and refusing to follow orders of law enforcement.

You are so full of shit it isn't funny. The immediate circumstances dictate use of force in federal law enforcement. Babbitt was unarmed and climbing through a window. We can see Byrd's gun and hands in video, even if he, himself, isn't visible. He does NOTHING to try and get her attention or use less that lethal force.

He shoots her once, even though she poses no immediate threat to life or property.

Then, the most egregious part, he flees the scene. Explain that part away. What police officer shoots and kills a suspect then leaves the scene?

Byrd should have been charged with manslaughter and misuse of a firearm, leaving the scene of a shooting, along with violation of his own department's use of force rules.