A 50 State Laboratory For The Best Healthcare

[evince]

lets discuss in length the federalist papers dickbite


then we can inform all of your other idiot pals that their side lost the discussion in the founding of the country



I have asked for this before but not one of you cuntlips would try

 

[domer76]

you idiot statists also have a hard time dealing with 'well regulated', believing it to be a reference that the framers never intended civilians to have arms, only a well regulated military, which makes you one of the stupidest fucks on the planet who won't read your history, so your interpretation of 'provide for the general welfare' is bullshit.

(laughing)

What a pathetic attempt at diversion. Start another topic on the outdated Second, tard. Until then, STFU

 

[domer76]

lo and behold, he was right about that, you ignorant retard.

States can't even afford to fund education, idiot. Roads are a little different, just like everything else, than they were in the 1780s

Pull your head out of your ass and take a look at the realities of the 21st century

 

[evince]

lets discuss in length the federalist papers dickbite


then we can inform all of your other idiot pals that their side lost the discussion in the founding of the country



I have asked for this before but not one of you cuntlips would try

poof


he disapears

 

[Robo]

I've already covered the process for you a couple of times, fucktard. How many more times do you need to be schooled on the issue?

It is within their purview and their authority to decide what those issues are. Being the RW retard that you are, you probably wouldn't understand any of them. Tough shit, bitch. Your vote is your weapon. Your words of ignorance don't mean shit.

Oh please commie repost your quote where you explained to the class WHAT THE FEDS COULD NOT DO IN THE NAME OF THE GNERAL WELFARE and what good the rest of the Constitution is if your absurd definition is correct. Why did they bother to waste so much ink commie?

 

[domer76]

Oh please commie repost your quote where you explained to the class WHAT THE FEDS COULD NOT DO IN THE NAME OF THE GNERAL WELFARE and what good the rest of the Constitution is if your absurd definition is correct. Why did they bother to waste so much ink commie?

Sorry, ignorant fucktard. I've described the legislative process several times for you. Can't help you, McCarthyist motherfucker, if you're too dense to understand.

 

[Robo]

Sorry, ignorant fucktard. I've described the legislative process several times for you. Can't help you, McCarthyist motherfucker, if you're too dense to understand.

DESCRIBE THIS COMMIE!

"If Congress can employ money indefinitely to the general welfare,
and are the sole and supreme judges of the general welfare,
they may take the care of religion into their own hands;
they may appoint teachers in every State, county and parish
and pay them out of their public treasury;
they may take into their own hands the education of children,
establishing in like manner schools throughout the Union;
they may assume the provision of the poor;
they may undertake the regulation of all roads other than post-roads;
in short, every thing, from the highest object of state legislation
down to the most minute object of police,
would be thrown under the power of Congress.... Were the power
of Congress to be established in the latitude contended for,
it would subvert the very foundations, and transmute the very nature
of the limited Government established by the people of America." (James Madison)


"If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the General Welfare, the Government is no longer a limited one, possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one....(James Madison)


"With respect to the words "general welfare," I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators." (James Madison)


"Our tenet ever was . . . that Congress had not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but were restrained to those specifically enumerated; and that, as it was never meant that they should provide for that welfare but by the exercise of the enumerated powers, so it could not have been meant they should raise money for purposes which the enumeration did not place under their action." (Thomas Jefferson)


"Congress has not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but only those specifically enumerated." (Thomas Jefferson)

 

[domer76]

DESCRIBE THIS COMMIE!

"If Congress can employ money indefinitely to the general welfare,
and are the sole and supreme judges of the general welfare,
they may take the care of religion into their own hands;
they may appoint teachers in every State, county and parish
and pay them out of their public treasury;
they may take into their own hands the education of children,
establishing in like manner schools throughout the Union;
they may assume the provision of the poor;
they may undertake the regulation of all roads other than post-roads;
in short, every thing, from the highest object of state legislation
down to the most minute object of police,
would be thrown under the power of Congress.... Were the power
of Congress to be established in the latitude contended for,
it would subvert the very foundations, and transmute the very nature
of the limited Government established by the people of America." (James Madison)


"If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the General Welfare, the Government is no longer a limited one, possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one....(James Madison)


"With respect to the words "general welfare," I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators." (James Madison)


"Our tenet ever was . . . that Congress had not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but were restrained to those specifically enumerated; and that, as it was never meant that they should provide for that welfare but by the exercise of the enumerated powers, so it could not have been meant they should raise money for purposes which the enumeration did not place under their action." (Thomas Jefferson)


"Congress has not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but only those specifically enumerated." (Thomas Jefferson)

As I refuted your bullshit in the other thread, I'll do it here.

Madison's "if" is horseshit. Congress never has been the sole and supreme judge of the general welfare. I've covered that with you multiple times before, but you're too fucking stupid for it to sink in.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

As I refuted your bullshit in the other thread, I'll do it here.

Madison's "if" is horseshit. Congress never has been the sole and supreme judge of the general welfare. I've covered that with you multiple times before, but you're too fucking stupid for it to sink in.

for the rest of the class that didn't get a chance to witness your complete insanity, please explain to us how the congress never has been the sole and supreme judgement of the general welfare clause when the general welfare clause is all about spending and the constitution SPECIFICALLY gives ONLY congress the authority to tax and spend.

we'll wait.

 

[domer76]

for the rest of the class that didn't get a chance to witness your complete insanity, please explain to us how the congress never has been the sole and supreme judgement of the general welfare clause when the general welfare clause is all about spending and the constitution SPECIFICALLY gives ONLY congress the authority to tax and spend.

we'll wait.

No need to wait, ignoramus. You failed government, didn't you, idiot?

Two other branches of government exist in the process. Do I need to explain that to you, too?

Fucking tard.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

No need to wait, ignoramus. You failed government, didn't you, idiot?

Two other branches of government exist in the process. Do I need to explain that to you, too?

Fucking tard.

what you NEED to explain is how you get the idiotic notion that, although the constitution expressly designates the spending power to congress, you think that the other two branches have the power to do so as well. got that? fucking tard

 

[domer76]

what you NEED to explain is how you get the idiotic notion that, although the constitution expressly designates the spending power to congress, you think that the other two branches have the power to do so as well. got that? fucking tard

You really do have a reading comprehension problem. I merely pointed out the obvious to everyone except you Constitutional idiots. I'll repeat again and type slowly.

Congress is not the sole and supreme judge of the general welfare. They can be over ridden by two other branches of government.

Jesus Christ, I feel like I'm talking to a 5 year old

 

[SmarterthanYou]

You really do have a reading comprehension problem. I merely pointed out the obvious to everyone except you Constitutional idiots. I'll repeat again and type slowly.

Congress is not the sole and supreme judge of the general welfare. They can be over ridden by two other branches of government.

Jesus Christ, I feel like I'm talking to a 5 year old

YOU are the 5 year old. CONGRESS is the only entity with spending power. so HOW do you come to the conclusion that the other two branches have any power to determine what 'general welfare' is??????

 

[domer76]

YOU are the 5 year old. CONGRESS is the only entity with spending power. so HOW do you come to the conclusion that the other two branches have any power to determine what 'general welfare' is??????

Goddam, you're stupid AND stubborn. Bad combo, Jethro.

I already explained it to you, denser-than-shit. Because they have the power to veto Congress's idea of what it is. Proof that Congress is not the sole and supreme judge. Got it, pal?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Goddam, you're stupid AND stubborn. Bad combo, Jethro.

I already explained it to you, denser-than-shit. Because they have the power to veto Congress's idea of what it is. Proof that Congress is not the sole and supreme judge. Got it, pal?

OMG, how are you not tied in a pretzel so fucking tight from the acrobatics you use to convince yourself that you're so fucking right in unreal. i'm so done wasting my energy on someone that fucking stupid. i.e. YOU

 

[Robo]

OMG, how are you not tied in a pretzel so fucking tight from the acrobatics you use to convince yourself that you're so fucking right in unreal. i'm so done wasting my energy on someone that fucking stupid. i.e. YOU

That's the asshole's only agenda, to make you quit. He has no arguments. He has only insults, accusations and attempted cover ups for his fucking idiocy. He's on the ropes and hysterical to save some of his ugly face. Make the bastard sweat! Let him prove his moronic ideology and opinions or hid behind his childish insult tantrums.

 

[Robo]

As I refuted your bullshit in the other thread, I'll do it here.

Madison's "if" is horseshit. Congress never has been the sole and supreme judge of the general welfare. I've covered that with you multiple times before, but you're too fucking stupid for it to sink in.

But the text itself of the Constitution is the sole judge of the general welfare simply because to interpret it as anything beyond the identifying ONLY those things identified/enumerated by the Constitution as constitutional powers of the Congress, the Constitution itself is reduced to a single contradictory and illogical phrase. That commie is your most severe of problems. You cannot explain that problem or overcome it because you're a fucking lying moronic progressive commie idiot!

 

[domer76]

But the text itself of the Constitution is the sole judge of the general welfare simply because to interpret it as anything beyond the identifying ONLY those things identified/enumerated by the Constitution as constitutional powers of the Congress, the Constitution itself is reduced to a single contradictory and illogical phrase. That commie is your most severe of problems. You cannot explain that problem or overcome it because you're a fucking lying moronic progressive commie idiot!

Sorry, idiot, no more patience with you. I've explained it enough for a third grader to understand.

Go fuck yourself, McCarthyist tard. Get your head out of your ass, out of the 50s and into reality.

 

[Robo]

Sorry, idiot, no more patience with you. I've explained it enough for a third grader to understand.

Go fuck yourself, McCarthyist tard. Get your head out of your ass, out of the 50s and into reality.

Fucking commie coward has no answers, no arguments, no honesty, no integrity and no fucking brains or balls. See ya around commie!

 

[domer76]

Fucking commie coward has no answers, no arguments, no honesty, no integrity and no fucking brains or balls. See ya around commie!

lol