A challenge for people who refused to vote for trump OR Hillary

aloysious said:
3D did. He voted for McMullin and liked all ten things. That election was over a yr. ago, the hildebeest has made more of an ass of herself since, and Trump is still pres. Now STFU and go to your safe room.
Click to expand...

Nope, you're an idiot and now on ignore.
 
Althea said:
Still obsessing over the election? Here's an idea...focus your angst on the DNC. Right now Dems could own the House/Senate with Bernie in the White House. But it was Hillary's 'turn'.

America decided to teach Democrats a lesson. DNC erroneously believed that they had the Obama coalition in their back pocket.

Sorry...people have to be inspired to vote. Especially kids.

Sure...it will take a couple of years for millenials to realize that they screwed themselves.

In the meantime, we have the list in your OP, which is valid.

But the real question is....what did Democrats learn?
Click to expand...

So, you can't answer the thread topic.

Democrats had little to no chance to take the House or Senate. We COULD have taken the White House. Democratic voters made a mistake choosing Hillary. And you made a mistake not choosing Hillary over trump.
 
Craig234 said:
Because 'no student being killed' - a candidate you WANTED to vote for - had no chance in the election. Your only choice was Hillary or trump - or saying 'you don't care which, they're the same, one student or a whole school, the same'.

Voting third party or not voting was saying that the difference between Hillary and trump was unimportant. You don't understand the thread's topic. Read the OP again.
Click to expand...

Because my best candidate had no chance I should vote for the worst candidate because he/she did?? HHHhhhmmm, I hope I am not the only one here that thinks that doesn't make much sense........:dunno:

You are also wrong, those two were not the only ones on my ballot or on most folks ballot & we can write in whoever we want...

I think I understand your topic & it's narrow focus but you offer us a challenge, are we not allowed to offer our opinions & perhaps that is a challenge to you??

Anyway, you are welcome to your opinion/view, as are we.......:)
 
No, Bill, I did not suggest you vote for the worst, why are you falsely quoting me? I said you should PREVENT the worst candidate - which you did not.

I didn't say they're the only two on the ballot. I said they're the only two with a practical chance to win. One or the other. You did not respond to the OP, so did not add to the discussion.
 
Craig234 said:
So, you can't answer the thread topic.

Democrats had little to no chance to take the House or Senate. We COULD have taken the White House. Democratic voters made a mistake choosing Hillary. And you made a mistake not choosing Hillary over trump.
Click to expand...
You obviously have no idea what the hell you're talking about. Senate was up for grabs, as many Red seats were up for re election. In case you missed it, Dems picked up another 2 seats in the Senate, and a handful in the House...with piss poor turnout for Hillary.
 
Althea said:
You obviously have no idea what the hell you're talking about. Senate was up for grabs, as many Red seats were up for re election. In case you missed it, Dems picked up another 2 seats in the Senate, and a handful in the House...with piss poor turnout for Hillary.
Click to expand...

You have no idea what the hell you're talking about, saying Democrats could have won the house that election.

The little chance was the Senate - the number of Republican seats up was high, but Democrats' odds were not good for taking control.

The only races with margins under 5%:

New Hampshire, 0.14%
Pennsylvania, 1.43%
Nevada, 2.43%
Missouri, 2.79%
Wisconsin, 3.36%

Two were won by Democrats, the other three were Republicans with the incumbency advantage. While Russ Feingold should have had a chance, the NY Times gave Republicans a 58% chance to keep the Senate.

Why don't you show some evidence for your claim Democrats had a shot at the Gerrymandered house? I won't hold my breath.
 
Craig234 said:
You have no idea what the hell you're talking about, saying Democrats could have won the house that election.

The little chance was the Senate - the number of Republican seats up was high, but Democrats' odds were not good for taking control.

The only races with margins under 5%:

New Hampshire, 0.14%
Pennsylvania, 1.43%
Nevada, 2.43%
Missouri, 2.79%
Wisconsin, 3.36%

Two were won by Democrats, the other three were Republicans with the incumbency advantage. While Russ Feingold should have had a chance, the NY Times gave Republicans a 58% chance to keep the Senate.

Why don't you show some evidence for your claim Democrats had a shot at the Gerrymandered house? I won't hold my breath.
Click to expand...
If voter turnout was the same as it was for Obama, Dems would have the Senate, and the House would be a lot closer...possibly (not probably) Dem.

You can try to make up data after the fact, but you're still wrong.
 
Craig234 said:
No, Bill, I did not suggest you vote for the worst, why are you falsely quoting me? I said you should PREVENT the worst candidate - which you did not.

I didn't say they're the only two on the ballot. I said they're the only two with a practical chance to win. One or the other. You did not respond to the OP, so did not add to the discussion.
Click to expand...

Who is actually worse is debatable but I prefer to vote who I want, not against one monster by voting for a different monster....
 
Althea said:
If voter turnout was the same as it was for Obama, Dems would have the Senate, and the House would be a lot closer...possibly (not probably) Dem.

You can try to make up data after the fact, but you're still wrong.
Click to expand...

They wouldn't have the house. You might want to see what happened to the house - and the states - UNDER Obama some time.

You're the one making up data ot say otherwise.
 
Craig234 said:
They wouldn't have the house. You might want to see what happened to the house - and the states - UNDER Obama some time.

You're the one making up data ot say otherwise.
Click to expand...
At least you conceded the Senate argument. Good on you. I said Dems might have gotten the House, but prob. not. It would all depend on Obama's coalition turning out.

Don't try to conflate mid term numbers with general election numbers. We aren't falling for it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top