A 'COWARD' BANS MEMBERS from commentary on a POLITICAL board.

Very very much shorter indeed;)

Morning, TOP.

It’s a beautiful day in the neighborhood in my small Georgia pueblo.

Several new socks appearing, Uncle Dutch, A ProudLefty etc.

I have never understood why a poster can not stand on his/her own but must use a sock to attempt to show support that isn’t extant.
 
Morning, TOP.

It’s a beautiful day in the neighborhood in my small Georgia pueblo.

Several new socks appearing, Uncle Dutch, A ProudLefty etc.

I have never understood why a poster can not stand on his/her own but must use a sock to attempt to show support that isn’t extant.
Well, for one...you can vote more often in the polls here...and, of course, you have built in back up;)
What do you call a group of liberal socks posting on JPP? Inevitable:laugh:
 
I've been accused of being a sock probably hundreds of times. You know how many times the person was right? Zero. I suppose people do create them, and the proverbial blind squirrel may stumble upon the acorn now and again. But for the most part, accusations of being a sock puppet are wrong more often than they are right. As for the topic of this thread, why anyone would start a thread and then ban ANYONE who might disagree with the premise is beyond me. It is lame and cowardly. Hasn't taken me long to figure out who the cowards are.
 
Morning, TOP.

It’s a beautiful day in the neighborhood in my small Georgia pueblo.

Several new socks appearing, Uncle Dutch, A ProudLefty etc.

I have never understood why a poster can not stand on his/her own but must use a sock to attempt to show support that isn’t extant.

From my experience socks are usually created for someone to harass another poster who has gotten the best of him, or to post personal information without jeopardizing their main.
 
I've been accused of being a sock probably hundreds of times. You know how many times the person was right? Zero. I suppose people do create them, and the proverbial blind squirrel may stumble upon the acorn now and again. But for the most part, accusations of being a sock puppet are wrong more often than they are right. As for the topic of this thread, why anyone would start a thread and then ban ANYONE who might disagree with the premise is beyond me. It is lame and cowardly. Hasn't taken me long to figure out who the cowards are.

Yeah, bit baffling, isn't it? I think I am technically Iolo's sock, but that is because Iolo's Email address suddenly became unacceptable, for reasons unknown. Onwards and upwards! Why this sock obsession here I don't know. Must be the cold American winters, or something!
 
Yeah, bit baffling, isn't it? I think I am technically Iolo's sock, but that is because Iolo's Email address suddenly became unacceptable, for reasons unknown. Onwards and upwards! Why this sock obsession here I don't know. Must be the cold American winters, or something!

It's an obsession on every single board I've ever posted on. When you've done this long enough, you start to recognize patterns and learn who to avoid. Just guessing, but it looks to me like 90% of the posts here are troll posts, so about average :)
 
Thread bans prevent all loons like you from posting on the link.

An ignore only shields the person from you.

And makes it so you dos not have to defend your position. You rightys can just cross talk and pretend you have it all figured out.
 
Morning, TOP.

It’s a beautiful day in the neighborhood in my small Georgia pueblo.

Several new socks appearing, Uncle Dutch, A ProudLefty etc.

I have never understood why a poster can not stand on his/her own but must use a sock to attempt to show support that isn’t extant.

Good morning, Earl.

I think Aproudlefty is real.

Dutch Uncle has sock pocket in his avatar, so I doubt he's real.

I think a lot of socks are created just to avoid the massive ban lists some posters use. JMHO.
 
Back
Top