A 'COWARD' BANS MEMBERS from commentary on a POLITICAL board.

[Trumpet]

You are alright, Trumper.

Horribly misguided, politically, but alright.

We will convert you with truth, Trumper.

Earl, I'm a bit confused has to what truth that, you're referring to.

 

[Earl]

Earl, I'm a bit confused has to what truth that, you're referring to.

The truth that you are horribly misguided, politically, Trumper.

 

[Trumpet]

The truth that you are horribly misguided, politically, Trumper.

Earl, in what way???? I can plainly see that Trump is totally dishonest and incompetent.

 

[Micawber]

The trolls often derail the thread.
I think banning trolls is fine. But when someone starts a thread and there are like 50 banned people, that's just pathetic. Those are the cowards who just don't want any dissenting opinions.

It's also a self defeating tactic. Legion, for example, and to a lesser degree Cabana Poon, want soapboxes and a captive audience of those they hate so they can torment them. Until, however, there is invented a "force others to read a thread they can't participate in" button, Legion is wasting his time. His are certainly the least read threads posted. Nobody reads threads they are banned from and trolls definitely want their hatelust consumed.

If you want to captivate people, write something intelligent and interesting.

 

[cancel2 2022]

It's also a self defeating tactic. Legion, for example, and to a lesser degree Cabana Poon, want soapboxes and a captive audience of those they hate so they can torment them. Until, however, there is invented a "force others to read a thread they can't participate in" button, Legion is wasting his time. His are certainly the least read threads posted. Nobody reads threads they are banned from and trolls definitely want their hatelust consumed.

If you want to captivate people, write something intelligent and interesting.

There speaks the arsehole that is so riled up by my many excellent threads that he initiates piss poor imitations because I won't let him play.

 

[StoneByStone]

It's also a self defeating tactic. Legion, for example, and to a lesser degree Cabana Poon, want soapboxes and a captive audience of those they hate so they can torment them. Until, however, there is invented a "force others to read a thread they can't participate in" button, Legion is wasting his time. His are certainly the least read threads posted. Nobody reads threads they are banned from and trolls definitely want their hatelust consumed.

If you want to captivate people, write something intelligent and interesting.

I especially like when one of the angry trolls makes a thread with a title like "questions Liberals can't answer" but bans anyone who could actually answer said questions.

 

[Legion]

I especially like when one of the angry trolls makes a thread with a title like "questions Liberals can't answer" but bans anyone who could actually answer said questions.

.

The trolls often derail the thread. I think banning trolls is fine.

 

[moon]

There speaks the arsehole that is so riled up by my many excellent threads ...

It must be JPP trolls' Self-Aggrandizement Day


Haw, haw.......................................haw.

 

[StoneByStone]

.

Nice try, but I don't ban anyone who would attempt to answer my questions. The only people I ban are people who don't answer questions, but instead just start name-calling.
You, on the other hand, ban people who disagree with you.

 

[Earl]

.

Irony, indeed.

 

[Legion]

I've never put anybody on ' Ignore ' but my reserve thread ban serves useful purposes. Once you've been a member for some considerable time here you can anticipate the reaction of the forum trolls to any given topic. Sometimes you might want to investigate a topic with other reasonable members and so you post your ban to eliminate the dross from your thread

Haw, haw.......................................haw.

 

[Legion]

I don't ban anyone who would attempt to answer my questions. The only people I ban are people who don't answer questions, but instead just start name-calling.

So you say.

It's one thing to thread ban habitual trolls.

I ban people.

I often have a thread ban list when I start a thread.

I don't allow racists, or haters in.

Does not seem cowardly to me. Like other mature adults who respect social etiquette, it just makes sense to exclude known racists, belligerent bigots, girlish gossipers, and libelers from civilized conversation.

I thread banned his ass so he couldn't shit the place up with his stinking shit.

It is every poster's option to ban as many others as he/she decides. It is an exaggeration to say that anyone here is 'banning everyone.'

Banning all the idiots is the best first line of defense.

I've never put anybody on ' Ignore ' but my reserve thread ban serves useful purposes. Once you've been a member for some considerable time here you can anticipate the reaction of the forum trolls to any given topic. Sometimes you might want to investigate a topic with other reasonable members and so you post your ban to eliminate the dross from your thread

There are a handful of posters here who are such good-for-nothing trolls they don't deserve to be allowed to post in my threads. Or anyone else's either. Ergo, I ban only them from every thread I start.

The trolls often derail the thread. I think banning trolls is fine.

Anyone dumb enough to post in one of your threads deserves being banned.

 

[Legion]

There speaks the arsehole that is so riled up by my many excellent threads that he initiates piss poor imitations because I won't let him play.

 

[moon]

Poor Leg-iron, the trolls' favorite ass-licker.


Haw, haw...............................haw.

 

[Earl]

So you say.

Old posts never die, do they, Legion?

 

[BartenderElite]

I received a stern reprimand for daring to mention Trump on a thread that TD was generous enough to open up for comment.

I guess they really don't want to hear about him anymore.

To each his own. If I wanted to talk in a vacuum, this isn't the board I'd come to. I probably wouldn't go to any board at all. But it's all good, as they say.

 

[moon]

Poor Leg-iron, the trolls' favorite ass-licker.

Oooops ! I forgot about poor old Earl.


Haw, haw.........................................haw.

 

[StoneByStone]

So you say.

Look at how many people I banned in my "Deep State Conspiracy" thread. There were like what, six people? Now compare that to your recent "compare & contrast" thread.

 

[Legion]

Look at how many people I banned in my "Deep State Conspiracy" thread. There were like what, six people? Now compare that to your recent "compare & contrast" thread.

So what? If fewer people had alt accounts that they use to evade threadbans and troll, my list would be considerably smaller.

You do know that the threadban feature was instituted at the behest of JPP liberals who wanted to exclude conservatives from their threads, don't you?

 

[Micawber]

There speaks the arsehole that is so riled up by my many excellent threads that he initiates piss poor imitations because I won't let him play.

First off, I didn't need the hint about your name change. Second, if you want to fantasize you are under someone's skin, go for it. I don't read threads I'm banned from.
I'll typically read the OP subject and if it contains a stupid lie that should be refuted I'll do so. If you've banned me and many others as it your wont, I'll make a companion thread
that simply makes my point which generally upends your intentional science denying heterodoxy and link your thread. I was told I should do this by a mod. And others who are banned seem to appreciate it.

I think you are an immoral jerk, but that doesn't rile me up. I am simply bewildered that a person can go through life
being so conscience deprived and propagate knowing lies for personal entertainment. It's a childish trait and you are over 60 FFS.
Time to grow up?