A Deadly Mix in Benghazi

Truth Detector said:
How does once "choose" to be an Ambassador? I'm pretty certain they are "appointed".

Dunce.
Click to expand...

TD: Stevens didn't "choose" to go to Benghazi, for reasons you cannot enunciate, any more than he "chose" to be Ambassador you ignorant dunce.

Then maybe you need to sharpen up your grammar so we don't infer something you didn't imply.
 
Truth Detector said:
Wrong again dunce; the bombing in Lebanon was on a Marine barracks near the airport who were there as a part of a UN peacekeeping force. They also attacked and killed a significant French force stationed nearby.

No one was asking for additional security in that case and the Marines were a peacekeeping force not a diplomatic mission.

Once again you illustrate what a poorly informed hyper partisan dunce you are. Thank you again for removing any doubt.
Click to expand...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_United_States_embassy_bombing

apologize for insulting my intelligence. asshole.

YOU are the one who is poorly informed. I lived there. I served in that city. the naval attache was my bridge partner. YOU are the fucking dunce here. not me.
 
Oh, I thought you guys knew, President Obama suspended free will. If he tells you to serve as Ambassador, you must!
 
Hey Truth Deflector.... why so silent... why aren't you telling me that the bombing of the US Embassy in Beirut in 1983 is just a figment of my imagination?

FUCKING DUNCE!
 
Big Money said:
Why wasn't a rescue operation launched?
Click to expand...

Dying to change the subject?


That has already been answered, there was not a viable rescue mission that would not unreasonably risk more American lives.

Why was no rescue mission launched to save Pat Tillman?
 
maineman said:
you're an idiot. you said that Stevens did not chose to be Ambassador of Libya. that proves what a fucking no-nothing douchebag you are. case closed.
Click to expand...

Dear dunce; do you have any evidence how Stevens Chose to be Ambassador? No you do not, because contrary to your ignorant and dishonest ramblings, you know that Ambassadors can not "choose" to be Ambassadors any more than they can "choose" the assignments they want to do.

Carry on Commander dimwit.
 
Truth Detector said:
Dear dunce; do you have any evidence how Stevens Chose to be Ambassador? No you do not, because contrary to your ignorant and dishonest ramblings, you know that Ambassadors can not "choose" to be Ambassadors any more than they can "choose" the assignments they want to do.

Carry on Commander dimwit.
Click to expand...

Ambassadors cannot chose to be Ambassadors?

Really?

So when the president appoints someone to be an Ambassador, they have no choice but to accept that appointment?

Really?

And how about that Beirut bombing, douchebag?

who is the dunce?
 
maineman said:
and.... you think that, once someone is appointed by the president, they have no CHOICE about whether or not to accept that appointment?

what an idiot!
Click to expand...

Dear dunce; once they are asked to serve, yes they can CHOOSE to either serve, or not serve. But they don't CHOOSE to be an Ambasador any more than they can CHOOSE where to be stationed or CHOOSE the missions they are assigned.

But alas, I am talking to an ignorant uninformed dishonest partisan dunce; his can I expect you to comprehend the OBVIOUS.
 
christiefan915 said:
TD: Stevens didn't "choose" to go to Benghazi, for reasons you cannot enunciate, any more than he "chose" to be Ambassador you ignorant dunce.

Then maybe you need to sharpen up your grammar so we don't infer something you didn't imply.
Click to expand...

Maybe you need to grow a brain so that you don't feel compelled to deflect topics away from your glaring ignorance and moronic claims?

But alas, I am talking to an uninformed and dishonest hyper partisan dunce; how can I expect anything honest or coherent from you?
 
Truth Detector said:
Dear dunce; once they are asked to serve, yes they can CHOOSE to either serve, or not serve. But they don't CHOOSE to be an Ambasador any more than they can CHOOSE where to be stationed or CHOOSE the missions they are assigned.

But alas, I am talking to an ignorant uninformed dishonest partisan dunce; his can I expect you to comprehend the OBVIOUS.
Click to expand...

people who are appointed by the president absolutely choose whether or not to be an ambassador. It is their choice whether or not to serve. And if you knew anything about how most Ambassadors are "chosen", you would know that, in many cases, they certainly do have input as to their assigned missions.

Any comment about the Beirut thing? dunce?
 
Truth Detector said:
Dear dunce; do you have any evidence how Stevens Chose to be Ambassador? No you do not, because contrary to your ignorant and dishonest ramblings, you know that Ambassadors can not "choose" to be Ambassadors any more than they can "choose" the assignments they want to do.

Carry on Commander dimwit.
Click to expand...

When offered the job a potential Ambassador can chose to accept it or not. It happens all the time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top