A Deeper dive into Mamdani grocery stores...

Ichabod Stain said:
no. that's not what you meant.

you said the bailout was necessary even though YOU PREFFERRED something else.
Click to expand...
No stop lying.

I was very specific saying Obama could have been a true Populist by giving the tax payers back their money and not giving it to the big banks.

Why are you against the government giving tax payers back their money which you said?
 
QP! said:
No stop lying.

I was very specific saying Obama could have been a true Populist by giving the tax payers back their money and not giving it to the big banks.

Why are you against the government giving tax payers back their money which you said?
Click to expand...
you said the bailouts were necessary even though you wanted Obama to do that.

really bankers needed to go to jail.
 
Ichabod Stain said:
you said the bailouts were necessary even though you wanted Obama to do that.

really bankers needed to go to jail.
Click to expand...
I said I wanted Obama to do it by giving taxpayer back their money. You keep lying and cutting that out despite it being right there.

So again why are you so against taxpayers getting back their money from the government. Why do you keep saying you do believe in that and only think government should keep it?
 
QP! said:
I said I wanted Obama to do it by giving taxpayer back their money. You keep lying and cutting that out despite it being right there.

So again why are you so against taxpayers getting back their money from the government. Why do you keep saying you do believe in that and only think government should keep it?
Click to expand...
I acknowldge that part.

you keep ignoring that you said they were still necessary even though Obama did not do that.
 
Ichabod Stain said:
I acknowldge that part.

you keep ignoring that you said they were still necessary even though Obama did not do that.
Click to expand...
Again i CLEARLY said Obama had a chance to do it by giving it to the taxpayers and you cannot help but lie by stopping my quote before that end part.

You then replied that taxpayers should never get money back from government and should only pay out to it.
 
QP! said:
Again i CLEARLY said Obama had a chance to do it by giving it to the taxpayers and you cannot help but lie by stopping my quote before that end part.

You then replied that taxpayers should never get money back from government and should only pay out to it.
Click to expand...
you said they were still necessary.
 
Ichabod Stain said:
you said they were still necessary.
Click to expand...
Again i said they were necessary as part of a tax payer bailout.

The liquidity crisis was real and taxpayers were about to get even more hurt so as part of a taxpayer bailout, with the government giving taxpayers back their money it was necessary.

You replied taxpayers should never get money back and should only pay government
 
QP! said:
No it demonstrated in the inability of some people to NEVER discuss any topic where Trump is doing something worse while acting like they are offended by something lesser.
Click to expand...
Absolute bullshit.
QP! said:
That is what is called hypocrisy and also extreme TDS. If Trump is opening 10 times the grocery stores as Mandami and you ignore that while crying about Mandami, you have mental illness known as TDS.
Click to expand...
You are the hypocrite, and utterly dishonest to boot. You felt the need to lie in the very title of this thread. You purposefully poisoned the well. You aren't interested in any meaningful discussion.
 
countryboy said:
Absolute bullshit.

You are the hypocrite, and utterly dishonest to boot. You felt the need to lie in the very title of this thread. You purposefully poisoned the well. You aren't interested in any meaningful discussion.
Click to expand...
Wrong.

I'm very much interested in a much deeper dive into the Mamdani Socialist grocery store and set as a benchmark the Trump socialism.

We all agree as @T. A. Gardner admitted the Trump socialism is bad and no one is denying it so let's figure out on a scale of 1 to 10 how Mamdani's socialism compares.

I rate Mamdani at around 2 of 10 and for scale Trump socialism at 7 of 10.

How do you rank it?
 
QP! said:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
So we do not have to talk about the Trump Admin looking to use tax payer to buy huge money loser Spirit Airlines who will then compete private airlines, and adding that stake to the earlier equity purchases by the Trump Admin in Intel Corp, MP Materials, Lithium Americas, Trilogy Metals, Westinghouse, Vulcan Elements, and U.S. Steel.

Wait, what .... a huge taxpayer purchase of a failing cash sink airline we are all talking about (well not 'all', as @Damocles , @T. A. Gardner , @FastLane , etc will have no comment on this as only grocery stores are bad and all else good) and that is on news segments now...

A quick summary if you do not know before getting back to the topic...


How A Fuel Crisis Pushed Spirit Airlines Toward Government Ownership​


...the Trump administration was negotiating a $500 million rescue package for Spirit Airlines, in a deal that could give Washington the option to control as much as 90% of the twice-bankrupt low-cost carrier ...

It’s a remarkable development, and one I believe investors should be aware of. Not because Spirit itself is a compelling investment—at this point, it’s anything but...


-------------------

Ok so now we know about the Trump gov't movement to buy it lets get back to the topic and talk about how Mamdani is a terrible socialist ruining the free markets and will destroy other private businesses who have to compete against the companies using gov't dollars.
Click to expand...
Your entire thread is full of ASSumptions.

I in fact started an entire thread dedicated to opposition to the gobblement taking over Spirit Airlines. Let them go bankrupt.

But, I do think it is funny that you think that is a justification for what the Commie Mamdummy wants to do. You think that because you are doing it in the name of food it makes the laws of supply and demand disappear?

Yeah, I am sure he can do a whole lot better than the USSR and Cuba did
 
QP! said:
Great.

Glad you are willing to admit this Trump admin is making what you guys point out as Mamdani socialism and danger to private businesses, look tame in comparison.

Trump is showing no signs of slowing this consistent run of socialist corporate investments.
Click to expand...
We get to witness another bank bailout while 10s of millions of American families are foreclosed on and end up on the streets.
 
Teflon Don said:
Your entire thread is full of ASSumptions.

I in fact started an entire thread dedicated to opposition to the gobblement taking over Spirit Airlines. Let them go bankrupt.

But, I do think it is funny that you think that is a justification for what the Commie Mamdummy wants to do. You think that because you are doing it in the name of food it makes the laws of supply and demand disappear?

Yeah, I am sure he can do a whole lot better than the USSR and Cuba did
Click to expand...

You seem to not understand ALL the Mamdani Grocery store talk is based on assumptions so using the 'Trump Socialist Multiple Business Investments' some of which have happened already and others which are assumptions is EXACTLY appropriate to use as a benchmark versus what you magats cry about being Mamdani socialism.

You DO NOT deep dive into Trump gov't debt in his terms WITHOUT bringing up other examples of other POTUS the debt they added. There is NOTHING more key to the deep dive than the benchmarking we CAN ALL AGREE UPON to set a scale and then to compare the Mamdani Socialism to that.

No one here would disagree that the TRUMP admin socialism is the most extreme examples of our lifetime so USING it to benchmark Mamdani socialism is ABSOLUTELY THE PROPER THING TO DO and only TDS would make anyone say otherwise.
 
QP! said:
You seem to not understand ALL the Mamdani Grocery store talk is based on assumptions so using the 'Trump Socialist Multiple Business Investments' some of which have happened already and others which are assumptions is EXACTLY appropriate to use as a benchmark versus what you magats cry about being Mamdani socialism.

You DO NOT deep dive into Trump gov't debt in his terms WITHOUT bringing up other examples of other POTUS the debt they added. There is NOTHING more key to the deep dive than the benchmarking we CAN ALL AGREE UPON to set a scale and then to compare the Mamdani Socialism to that.

No one here would disagree that the TRUMP admin socialism is the most extreme examples of our lifetime so USING it to benchmark Mamdani socialism is ABSOLUTELY THE PROPER THING TO DO and only TDS would make anyone say otherwise.
Click to expand...
They aren't assumptions about what he is doing. We base it off what he claims to be doing AND basic economics. But for some reason you marxists think you can just ignore basic economics. You can't
 
Teflon Don said:
They aren't assumptions about what he is doing. We base it off what he claims to be doing AND basic economics. But for some reason you marxists think you can just ignore basic economics. You can't
Click to expand...
I am basing what Trump is doing is based on what his admin claims to be doing and basic economics.

For some reasons you magats ignore basic economics.

If the Mamdani Gropcery store stuff is NOT speculation even though it is has not happened and all you have is the talk of how it MIGHT play out once finalized then so to then the Trump stuff is NOT speculation.

Of they are both speculation.

Well except for all the prior Trump administrations investments in private companies which DID HAPPEN so that socialism has ALREADY occured.
 
QP! said:
Again i said they were necessary as part of a tax payer bailout.

The liquidity crisis was real and taxpayers were about to get even more hurt so as part of a taxpayer bailout, with the government giving taxpayers back their money it was necessary.

You replied taxpayers should never get money back and should only pay government
Click to expand...
no thats not what you said.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top