The persons who wrote the Bible are also dead.
The Bible was inspired by God, written by men, so technically yes, however the inspire r is not!
The persons who wrote the Bible are also dead.
Others claim their holy books are divinely inspired as well. Yours is not unique in that respect.The Bible was inspired by God, written by men, so technically yes, however the inspire r is not!
Why are you Christians always claiming God told you to condemn others?
I did not say God audibly spoke to me, you scumbag lying piece of shit.
The Bible was inspired by God, written by men, so technically yes, however the inspire r is not!
That’s what all believers say about their religions, I’m trying to invert you to save you, in the past it was done by the sword.Never said that they condemn themselves, I am trying to help them, by pointing out where they are separated from God based on unrepentant sin!
Others claim their holy books are divinely inspired as well. Yours is not unique in that respect.
God condemns women who interrupt their husbands, condemns gay people, endorses slavery, etc.
Why is it that "god" always hates the exact same people that old, white, male christians hate?
Is that just a FANTASTIC coincidence?
Good afternoon, dear son. How is your day?How did I miss that one? Lol bp going spiritual nice
Blessin’s
I have yet to bring forward much.
I have way better information to support my views.
I'd actually much rather talk here about Balkanization.
Why it is a problem for not just an issue for the USA but a global issue.
That's actually more on topic.
Balkanization is a big reason for USA division.
Good afternoon, dear son. How is your day?
How do you make Holy water? You boil the Hell out of it.
The persons who wrote the Bible are also dead.
Yes, the Jews believe they are God’s chosen people, but didn’t they turn their backs on his Son? So now God’s chosen people are the Christians and the Jews will have to convert. See how each religion believes they are the only ones of their chosen God.Other books from the Geeks I mean Greeks do not have any authenticating factors to support their claims.
The God of the Bible does.
It is called Israel.
No nation could survive their history without a God who kept them intact even when they rebelled against their God time and time and time again. The God of the Jews lives.
Blessin’s
Yes, a big problem. Those that wrote the Gospels weren’t even eye witnesses. They received their account from others.Which means gathering up eyewitnesses is a problem.
Other books from the Geeks I mean Greeks do not have any authenticating factors to support their claims.
The God of the Bible does.
It is called Israel.
No nation could survive their history without a God who kept them intact even when they rebelled against their God time and time and time again. The God of the Jews lives.
Blessin’s
Yes, a big problem. Those that wrote the Gospels weren’t even eye witnesses. They received their account from others.
Agreed. It's a common problem with ancient texts. IMHO, it's best to look at the concept they are attempting to convey rather than the "power of the written word" being presented. I do not take any ancient texts literally. Some can be verified to a small extent, but the point seems to be conveying a way of thinking, not just saying who did what to whom.Yes, a big problem. Those that wrote the Gospels weren’t even eye witnesses. They received their account from others.
Other books from the Geeks I mean Greeks do not have any authenticating factors to support their claims.
The God of the Bible does.
It is called Israel.
I support education over laws, but sometimes a population refuses to be educated, so laws become necessary.Agreed. It's a common problem with ancient texts. IMHO, it's best to look at the concept they are attempting to convey rather than the "power of the written word" being presented. I do not take any ancient texts literally. Some can be verified to a small extent, but the point seems to be conveying a way of thinking, not just saying who did what to whom.
Example. If you wanted to end racism in the civilized world, is it better to stamp it out with laws and, when necessary, force or is it better to try to teach others a way of thinking where racism is unimportant because it doesn't exist?
Agreed. It's a common problem with ancient texts. IMHO, it's best to look at the concept they are attempting to convey rather than the "power of the written word" being presented. I do not take any ancient texts literally. Some can be verified to a small extent, but the point seems to be conveying a way of thinking, not just saying who did what to whom.
Example. If you wanted to end racism in the civilized world, is it better to stamp it out with laws and, when necessary, force or is it better to try to teach others a way of thinking where racism is unimportant because it doesn't exist?