A Growing Volume Of Evidence Undercuts ‘Consensus’ Climate Science
- Thread starter cancel2 2022
- Start date
Corazón, so true, you still smoking two packs a day? And I was glad to hear you used asbestos in all your rooms, don't worry about the dust, it won't harm you. You're a real man tough and you don't believe in science either. Go get em.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7799004-merchants-of-doubt
"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservative." John Stuart Mill
"Call it Corporate America vs. We the People. Globalization vs. Mother Earth. Privatization vs. the Public Good. Wall Street vs. Main Street. Plutocracy vs. Democracy. Which side are you on?" Scott McLarty http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/05/19-0
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7799004-merchants-of-doubt
"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservative." John Stuart Mill
"Call it Corporate America vs. We the People. Globalization vs. Mother Earth. Privatization vs. the Public Good. Wall Street vs. Main Street. Plutocracy vs. Democracy. Which side are you on?" Scott McLarty http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/05/19-0
evince
Truthmatters
some of these idiots are paid to post
then russians didnt just learn this one
the world has seen this type of on the cheap propaganda before
Its just now on a new medium called the internets.
fools believe what they are told without question .
question everything on the internets
never just believe someone is what they say they are without proof
Its why I never try to pretendIm something I am nit on the internets or anywhere else for that matter.
Truth gives you power
those who lie will NEVER feel that power.
they will always be powerless to the truth.
they truely dont understand the real world.
they are lessor beings than those who tell the truth.
face the world with truth
if you dont
you never really see the real world.
your lies infect your world.
you will never GET IT.
pathetic creatures
then russians didnt just learn this one
the world has seen this type of on the cheap propaganda before
Its just now on a new medium called the internets.
fools believe what they are told without question .
question everything on the internets
never just believe someone is what they say they are without proof
Its why I never try to pretendIm something I am nit on the internets or anywhere else for that matter.
Truth gives you power
those who lie will NEVER feel that power.
they will always be powerless to the truth.
they truely dont understand the real world.
they are lessor beings than those who tell the truth.
face the world with truth
if you dont
you never really see the real world.
your lies infect your world.
you will never GET IT.
pathetic creatures
Why don't you prove you truly believe in this hoax by voluntarily refusing to exhale and emit CO2.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Greenland set the record for coldest July temperature ever reported in the Northern Hemisphere at -33C. However you won't see any mention of that in the NYT, WaPo, the BBC or the Guardian. Who will be the first to tell me that weather is not climate?
Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Holy fuck, when will people wake up and realise Naomi Oreskes is a massive fraud. She has no climate science background, she is a historian ffs, and Merchants of Doubt is a truly dire book full of dubious stats and propaganda. If you want to believe its contents then good for you, but don't expect me to read or see her bullshit.
Here is a real climate scientist clinically taking that book and the more recent film apart!!
https://judithcurry.com/2015/03/15/bankruptcy-of-the-merchants-of-doubt-meme/
Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
Last edited:
Garbage
They are not decided by majorities, but they are confirmed or proven incorrect by the studies of others, you act as if the 97% usually quoted is the entity in itself rather than the survey of literature on the topic
Now you can add all your adolescent personal crap to cover your shortcomings
So then how does one define Science, seemingly according to you it is the last PHD
Of course exceptions exist, they exist in anything, even a broken clock is correct twice a day, silly to cite half of dozen over the course of mankind and generalize that that makes any consensus irrelevant
And your guy is a physicist, which is a step up from the other guy's geologist he keeps citing
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Holy fuck, the late great Richard Feynman would have a field day laying into all the Cargo Cult science surrounding AGW. Fortunately we do have the likes of Freeman Dyson, the greatest living physicist and Richard Lindzen whose book Dynamics in Atmospheric Physics has become a standard textbook.
Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Richard Tol has contributed to the IPCC and is scathing about the nonsensus in that infamous John Cook study.
http://richardtol.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/now-almost-two-years-old-john-cooks-97.html?m=1
Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
cancel2 2022
Canceled
This is way above their paygrades, you do know that don't you? See post 92.
Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
cancel2 2022
Canceled
So which one of the four Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs), outlined by the IPCC AR5 do you ascribe to and why?
Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
Perhaps, but then again, YOU AREN'T ONE. And neither are we. So the default setting should be deference to the vast and overwhelming consensus of those who are, dumbass.
You have a chemistry degree from back in the stone ages and worked in IT according to you own unverifiable CV you gave here. You aren't a climate scientist at all. And no amount of blogging will EVER make you one.
Cancel 2018.1
New member
Disagree. Look at this post in response to mine:
The first sentence makes no sense, the second is patently false (6, really? lol) and the first part of the third doesn't rebut the any content, and the second part of the third makes no sense. "the other guy's geologist?" WTF is that?
This is pure babble.
Also read this:
Even if that 97% BS were true and unbiased the statement is patently false. It is not a "survey of literature on the topic" , it's a survey of the beliefs of authors.
I've never seen one article that actually concludes GW is caused by human activity. I'm sure one exists, just never seen it.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Perhaps, but then again, YOU AREN'T ONE. And neither are we. So the default setting should be deference to the vast and overwhelming consensus of those who are, dumbass.
You have a chemistry degree from back in the stone ages and worked in IT according to you own unverifiable CV you gave here. You aren't a climate scientist at all. And no amount of blogging will EVER make you one.
How many times are you going to say the same bullshit? Al Gore is not a scientist, he only scraped a D in science at Harvard. Bill Nye is not one either come to that. Naomi Oreskes is a historian, Stephen Lewandowsky is some kind of psychologist and there are many others who feel able to comment without any climate science qualifications. Even Gavin Schmidt, the head of the Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS) is a mathematician by training. I asked you to comment constructively in post 91 but you failed to do so hence, to paraphrase our old friend Runatic, you can lick my balls.
Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
Last edited:
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Oh I accept that there is an anthropogenic signal, many climate scientists are agreeing that Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity (ECS) is of the order 1.2K for a doubling of CO2 concentration. So that is a doubling from around 280ppm at the start of the Industrial Revolution back in 1780 to 560ppm by 2080, in other words three centuries. Of course that won't scare anybody hence the need to invent various positive feedback mechanisms to ramp up temperatures increases to 4K and beyond, as predicted by the RCP 8.5 scenario aka the business as usual model.
http://notrickszone.com/2017/10/16/...e-trending-towards-zero/#sthash.r48awsDA.dpbs
Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
Last edited:
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Let's cut all the BS and just deal with this:
- only a complete idiot would try and tell you that several CENTURIES of GLORBAL deforestation and urbanization coupled with increasing industrial waste emissions has little to no effect on the environment.
- no one is denying that the Earth has natural cycles of cooling and warming....the point here is that mankind has ARTIFICIALLY INDUCED elements into the mix that is having increased detrimental effects.
- only a complete idiot would try and tell you that several CENTURIES of GLORBAL deforestation and urbanization coupled with increasing industrial waste emissions has little to no effect on the environment.
- no one is denying that the Earth has natural cycles of cooling and warming....the point here is that mankind has ARTIFICIALLY INDUCED elements into the mix that is having increased detrimental effects.
And because of fools who deny this, we are behind the game in dealing with it.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Yet paradoxically, the increase in atmospheric CO2 has resulted in a truly extraordinary re-greening effect. This is especially true in desert and arid areas of the planet.
https://www.spectator.co.uk/2016/10/the-world-is-getting-greener-why-does-no-one-want-to-know/
Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
Cancel 2018.1
New member
55 Benefits of Atmospheric CO2
Enrichment
Air Pollution Stress (Non
–
Ozone)
Air Pollution Stress (Ozone)
Avoiding Human Starvation and
Plant and Animal Extinctions
Bacteria
Biodiversity
Biogenic Vo
latile Organic Compounds
Biomass
C4 Plants
CAM Plants
Carbon
Sequestration
Diseases of Plants
Early Growth
Earthworms
Evolution
Flowers
Fluctuating Asymmetry
Glomalin
Health
-
Promoting Substances
Herbivory
Hormones
Human Longevity
Human Mortality (All Causes)
Human Mortality (Cardiovascular)
Human Mortality
(Respiratory)
Iodocompounds
Isoprene
Light Stress
Lipids
Medicinal Plants
Monoterpenes
Nectar
Net Primary Productivity
Nitrogen Fixation
Nutrient Acquisition
Phosphorus Acquisition
Photosynthesis
Progressive Nitrogen Limitation
Reactive Oxygen Species
Root Exudation
Root Production
Salinity Stress
Seeds
Soil Erosion
Soil Toxicity
Starch
Tannins
Temperature Stress
Thylakoid Membranes
Transpiration
UV
-
B Radiation Stress
Vegetative Storage Proteins
Water Stress
Water
-
Use Efficiency
Weeds
Wood Density
http://www.co2science.org/education/book/2011/55BenefitsofCO2Pamphlet.pdf