A little reminder for Trump supporters.

[Poor Richard Saunders]

The Senate was never notified on the 13th, dumbass. It's not an impeachment until the Senate is notified. The the Senate WAS finally notified (after Trump left office), they summarily threw it out on that basis.

It seems you are in denial of the US Constituiton.
The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

Not only is there nothing in there about an impeachment not occurring until the Senate is informed, the use of the word sole would imply that the Senate has nothing to do with the power of impeachment.

 

[Into the Night]

It seems you are in denial of the US Constituiton.
The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

Not only is there nothing in there about an impeachment not occurring until the Senate is informed, the use of the word sole would imply that the Senate has nothing to do with the power of impeachment.

Special pleading fallacy. You forget what an impeachment is and how it involves the Senate. Read the REST of the Constitution, fella. It's not an impeachment until the Senate is notified.

 

[Jarod]

I think they will proven themselves idiots (another time) and nominate Trump again.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Special pleading fallacy. You forget what an impeachment is and how it involves the Senate. Read the REST of the Constitution, fella. It's not an impeachment until the Senate is notified.

^^ Special idiot using the fallacy fallacy!! ^^
It takes a special kind of idiot to argue that the US Constitution is a special pleading.

It's an impeachment when the House says it's an impeachment -
The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

Any argument that it requires the Senate before an impeachment occurs is in denial of what the US Constitution actually says.



sole - adjective

3
: belonging exclusively or otherwise limited to one usually specified individual, unit, or group

 

[Into the Night]

^^ Special idiot using the fallacy fallacy!! ^^
It takes a special kind of idiot to argue that the US Constitution is a special pleading.

It's an impeachment when the House says it's an impeachment -
The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

Any argument that it requires the Senate before an impeachment occurs is in denial of what the US Constitution actually says.



sole - adjective

3
: belonging exclusively or otherwise limited to one usually specified individual, unit, or group

It takes a special kind of idiot to assume that quoting only part of the Constitution is quoting all of the Constitution. The special pleading fallacy applies to YOU, dumbass, not the Constitution.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

It takes a special kind of idiot to assume that quoting only part of the Constitution is quoting all of the Constitution. The special pleading fallacy applies to YOU, dumbass, not the Constitution.

It takes an even more special kind of idiot to completely ignore the Constitution and claim they know something that clearly is nowhere in the Constitution.

You are pretty special in your pleading that shows your ignorance. And once again you rely on the fallacy fallacy instead of citing anywhere in the Constitution that says that the impeachment isn't complete until the Senate sees it.

 

[Damocles]

So you think Biden killed OJ.s family? There must be some way you think they are connected. Rightys deflections know no bounds.

You should tell OJ, since you are a character in one of his movies <wink wink> you must know him! You'll be famous for helping to find "the real killer"... You can call him on the golf course <wink wink him, not yourself>, and he (you) can say he (you) solved the case while he (you) was looking for the real killer on the golf course!

A win/win... and now we know why the glove didn't fit!

 

[Taichiliberal]

I notice that to date no one has disproven or debunked one item from the OP.

Instead, we get detours and dodges all over the political social spectrum.

Very telling, is it not?

 

[Into the Night]

It takes an even more special kind of idiot to completely ignore the Constitution and claim they know something that clearly is nowhere in the Constitution.

You are pretty special in your pleading that shows your ignorance. And once again you rely on the fallacy fallacy instead of citing anywhere in the Constitution that says that the impeachment isn't complete until the Senate sees it.

The Constitution speaks for itself. The Constitution is the authoritative reference of the Constitution. You just want to deny it. A vote of impeachment is not impeachment. It must be delivered to the Senate to be an impeachment. It is not possible to impeach someone that is not in office.
Still you cling to the falsehood that impeachment itself means anything. You consider it a conviction.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

The Constitution speaks for itself. The Constitution is the authoritative reference of the Constitution. You just want to deny it. A vote of impeachment is not impeachment. It must be delivered to the Senate to be an impeachment. It is not possible to impeach someone that is not in office.
Still you cling to the falsehood that impeachment itself means anything. You consider it a conviction.

The Constitution does speak for itself.

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

The Constitution when it speaks says nothing about the impeachment doesn't occur until it is delivered to the Senate. The Constitution says it is ONLY the House that has the power of impeachment. Nowhere does it say that the power requires interaction with anyone else.


The Constitution also says
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments.
That doesn't say the impeachment doesn't occur until they receive something from the House.

 

[Into the Night]

The Constitution does speak for itself.

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

The Constitution when it speaks says nothing about the impeachment doesn't occur until it is delivered to the Senate. The Constitution says it is ONLY the House that has the power of impeachment. Nowhere does it say that the power requires interaction with anyone else.


The Constitution also says
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments.
That doesn't say the impeachment doesn't occur until they receive something from the House.

Repetition fallacy (chanting). Argument of the Stone fallacy.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Repetition fallacy (chanting). Argument of the Stone fallacy.

That would be you all right. Repetitious.

But the interesting part of it is you keep claiming you are right and can't point to anywhere in the Constitution that supports your idiotic opinion. And when I keep pointing to the exact part that clearly states that the House has the sole power of impeachment with no requirement that the Senate be sent the impeachment you accuse me of fallacies.

This is the exact part of the Constitution that would point to your argument being nothing but bullshit.
The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

 

[Truth Detector]

Handjob, find us a more corrupt administration than what trump gave us.

Biden, dumb fuck.

Obama, dumb fuck.

Clinton, dumb fuck.

 

[Truth Detector]

The previous SOS's back 4 administrations used public servers as well and those were truly public, Hillary's was not. Colin Powell said he used AOL and Hillary did not destroy any evidence.

Lie, lame and moronic. By the way, dumbass, if someone else did it, it doesn't make it less criminal.

 

[Nordberg]

You should tell OJ, since you are a character in one of his movies <wink wink> you must know him! You'll be famous for helping to find "the real killer"... You can call him on the golf course <wink wink him, not yourself>, and he (you) can say he (you) solved the case while he (you) was looking for the real killer on the golf course!

A win/win... and now we know why the glove didn't fit!

Can you imagine someone who thinks that is a pertinent response?

 

[Damocles]

Can you imagine someone who thinks that is a pertinent response?

Can you imagine someone who names themselves after a character that OJ played in the Naked Gun series actually pretending that they were serious enough for me to care if they think it is pertinent?

A bit like a knackered brit calling themselves "Tim" then blasting off about how evil Sorcerers are and how coconuts don't migrate!

 

[floridafan]

Biden, dumb fuck.

Obama, dumb fuck.

Clinton, dumb fuck.

You are so full of shit. If you like I can produce once again a list of every trump associate who has been indicted, gone to jail, left office under a cloud, been dismissed for crime or corruption. It's a very long list, my sweetie.
Then we have Trump himself, twice impeached, under criminal investigation in 4 different jurisdictions, and there is so much more.

 

[Nordberg]

Can you imagine someone who names themselves after a character that OJ played in the Naked Gun series actually pretending that they were serious enough for me to care if they think it is pertinent?

A bit like a knackered brit calling themselves "Tim" then blasting off about how evil Sorcerers are and how coconuts don't migrate!

OJs character always tried to do the right thing. When the others showed up, he was already done in. Your error is thinking I seek your approval.

 

[Truth Detector]

You are so full of shit. If you like I can produce once again a list of every trump associate who has been indicted, gone to jail, left office under a cloud, been dismissed for crime or corruption. It's a very long list, my sweetie.
Then we have Trump himself, twice impeached, under criminal investigation in 4 different jurisdictions, and there is so much more.

Stuck on moron.

 

[Taichiliberal]

The Constitution does speak for itself.

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

The Constitution when it speaks says nothing about the impeachment doesn't occur until it is delivered to the Senate. The Constitution says it is ONLY the House that has the power of impeachment. Nowhere does it say that the power requires interaction with anyone else.


The Constitution also says
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments.
That doesn't say the impeachment doesn't occur until they receive something from the House.

Of course you're on target, but you're wasting time and effort on a MAGA troll and his parrot squawk.