Wow.. I can't believe a peace-loving liberal is advocating this level of violence. What happened to imagining all the people, living life in peace? John Lennon would be ashamed of you. Besides, I see several major flaws you might have overlooked. First and foremost, beating us into submission won't do the trick, as you correctly said, complete and total annihilation is the only way... if you simply beat us into submission, we will reconstitute and return, again and again. The next problem is the numbers. This country has more conservatives than liberals, the liberals are just louder. Then there is the matter of logistics, most liberals live on the west coast or in the northeast, so you would immediately find your forces divided by about 3,000 miles of pissed off conservatives. Finally, there is the weaponry. While I am sure there are quite a few hypocritical anti-gun liberals who own firearms, they are most likely non-automatic weapons which conform to the law, while conservatives are more likely to have altered weapons capable of rapid-fire, and lots of stockpiled ammunition. Plus, our crazy-ass militants are much better trained than your crazy-ass militants in the art of combat. Sure, you do have some contingent of union thugs with baseball bats, but I suspect the Montana Militia alone, could take them out in short order. Our intelligence gathering would be superior, because conservatives have no problem waterboarding, especially liberal scumbags like you... while liberals wouldn't be able to bring themselves to commit 'war crimes' for the sake of intelligence. All in all, it wouldn't be a pretty sight for the liberals, so you might be careful what you wish for, dumbass.
