gfm7175
Mega MAGA
Stop evading. Answer the question asked of you.For oil, or for nuclear?
Have you done the research yet that shows how silly your OP was?
Stop evading. Answer the question asked of you.For oil, or for nuclear?
Have you done the research yet that shows how silly your OP was?
Have you ever heard of 'equity'? (but not the kind of "equity" that liberals regularly and mindlessly chant for)How do you invest in a private company?
Another stupid Nordbutt response.Another stupid TA thread.
Under such a scenario, essentially it is.If you pay for electricity with money you make on investments, it is not free.
Of course he could, but using it as an investment for local utility company stock (to generate dividends and stock value that offsets the cost of electricity from that company) makes more sense than using it as an expense for rooftop solar panels.You could use that money for something else.
Bastardizing his position does not make it illogical. He's not saying that the electricity itself is free (but rather that it "nets" as being free via the investment income from the stocks/dividends in the utility company). You already know this but wish to be dishonest anyway.You are paying for electricity, therefore it is absolutely not free. That was illogical. But typical for Trumpys.
Logic eludes you. It is very simple and you cannot understand. How sad. I see why you are a Tumpy.
LMFAOYou obviously have no concept of what a thought experiment is. Another cue that you are a moron.
Great. Care to take a crack at explaining how prepaying $50k for electricity actually makes money?The point of TA's post was to explain how buying stock in a local utility company could end up offsetting the cost of electricity (via value of stock and dividends). It also explains how buying stock in a local utility company is ACTUALLY an investment as opposed to buying rooftop solar panels which is actually an expense (essentially a pre-paid expense).
Of course he could, but using it as an investment for local utility company stock (to generate dividends and stock value that offsets the cost of electricity from that company) makes more sense than using it as an expense for rooftop solar panels.
.
You cannot buy shares of a company that isn't traded on the market.Have you ever heard of 'equity'? (but not the kind of "equity" that liberals regularly and mindlessly chant for)
Was there a question?Stop evading. Answer the question asked of you.
There is no "pre-payment for electricity" in this scenario. An investment in a local utility company is not a pre-payment.LMFAO
So now it's a thought experiment? I already schooled you on the flaw in your experiment, but you continue to argue a ridiculous point.
So are you finished with your 'experiment'? Because prepaying $50k for electricity in order to earn $200/month sounds like the worst investment advice I've ever heard.
You can't just pretend your way out of it either.Was there a question?
Clearly you haven't heard of 'equity'.You cannot buy shares of a company that isn't traded on the market.
Thanks for admitting that one doesn't make any money on rooftop solar panels.Great. Care to take a crack at explaining how prepaying $50k for electricity actually makes money?
LMFAO
So now it's a thought experiment? I already schooled you on the flaw in your experiment, but you continue to argue a ridiculous point.
So are you finished with your 'experiment'? Because prepaying $50k for electricity in order to earn $200/month sounds like the worst investment advice I've ever heard.
Catch up with the thread, and then enlighten us how prepaying $50k for electricity is a winning strategy.There is no "pre-payment for electricity" in this scenario. An investment in a local utility company is not a pre-payment.
There was no questionYou can't just pretend your way out of it either.
Answer the question.
I've been watching since season 1.Clearly you haven't heard of 'equity'.
Clearly you've never seen the TV show 'Shark Tank'.
You're not an expert on investing if you think investing $50k in order to realize a gain of $200/month is a good idea if the goal is 'free electricity'.Thanks for admitting that one doesn't make any money on rooftop solar panels.
There is no "prepaying $50k for electricity" under this stock scenario. An investment (of $50k or otherwise) is not a prepaid expense.
Maybe you should just "listen to the experts" on this one?? (I'm an expert on this subject matter btw).
Continued support for why rooftop solar panels are "[not] a winning strategy", although you'd mistakenly claim that they are.Catch up with the thread, and then enlighten us how prepaying $50k for electricity is a winning strategy.
Ignoring the existence of a question doesn't make it go away.There was no question
... and after the many seasons of Shark Tank that you've religiously watched, you STILL don't properly comprehend what is happening on that show?I've been watching since season 1.
Oh, of course! OF COURSE investing in a private company is somehow NOT investing in a private company.This isn't that,
There was nothing idiotic about it. He suggested investing one's money to "get free electricity" (to get returns on said investment which offsets the cost of electricity) instead of pre-paying for 20 years of electricity via rooftop solar panels. You then tried to make fun of him, claiming that he couldn't invest in APS because APS was a private company. He then schooled you again by providing you with the publicly traded holding company of APS (Pinnacle West), and now I'm schooling you re: the ability to invest in private companies and re: what prepaid expenses are vs what investments are.no matter how hard you try to make sense of the idiotic claim in the OP