Truck Fump / h1b
Verified User
Redefinition fallacy.
stfu, broken record idiot loser.
Redefinition fallacy.
quit being such a fascist fucktoid.You are killing me with your claims that everything is fascism. Maple syrup is fascism, being the product of corporate and government power.
There was no questionNow you're resorting to denying the English language? It most certainly IS a question. You could try answering it instead of evading it.
And for a prepayment of $50k, you can hit your target income of $200/month....but the holding company IS publicly traded.
If you say so. It's down 25% in the last five years. Down $2/share since this discussion began.The holding company is NOT failing.
He can earn a better return if he puts the $50k in a money market account. I thought you were an investment genius?He sure can!
Of course it is. He's looking for a monthly income. What exactly is the alternative that you suggest?No, it's not.
Today it's down. That's the way equities work. Which is why the 'thought experiment' in the OP is moronic.Sure, but pick a longer time frame and it is up. You are cherry picking.
Wrong. Sharks have NEVER gone door to door begging to invest in a private company. That's the exact metaphor here. You seem to think that you can force private companies to sell you equity.I've already told you about it. I've told you that it is an example of investments into private companies. There are numerous other examples that could be provided.
I thought it was spelled "corperATE"? Oh wait, that's for the climATE nutters...Did you just combine the "R" of goveRnment with the "A" of corporAte? FASCISM! Stop it. Stop it now!
You were asked the question, you even directly quoted it while providing a smart-ass evasive reply to it, then you tried denying the question's existence, then I reminded you of the question via copy/pasting the wording of it, and since then you've been attempting to redefine what a question is in order to deny it's existence ("a question that Althea doesn't like is somehow not a question")There was no question
LOL. So the investment guru has declared defeat.You were asked the question, you even directly quoted it while providing a smart-ass evasive reply to it, then you tried denying the question's existence, then I reminded you of the question via copy/pasting the wording of it, and since then you've been attempting to redefine what a question is in order to deny it's existence ("a question that Althea doesn't like is somehow not a question")
You REALLY can't help yourself... TOO FUNNY!!!
There is no "prepayment". An investment is not a prepayment. Thank GOD you don't work in accounting.And for a prepayment of $50k, you can hit your target income of $200/month.
I say so.If you say so.
It's up 30% in the last ten years.It's down 25% in the last five years.
Up $1.50/share since opening this morning.Down $2/share since this discussion began.
Now you're conveniently ignoring the dividends.He can earn a better return if he puts the $50k in a money market account.
I apparently know more about it than you do.I thought you were an investment genius?
No it isn't. There are a plethora of ways to get $200/mo in passive income. You're continuing to try to plow your way past the point of this thread to pick out one little small thing so that you can make a mountain out of a mole hill.Of course it is. He's looking for a monthly income. What exactly is the alternative that you suggest?
Nope. It's already up $1.50 today.Today it's down.
You aren't describing anything more than your own cherry picking. You purposely picked a "5 year ago" starting point because PW is currently down 25% from that starting date. However, I can just as easily pick a "10 year ago" starting point and PW is currently up 30% from THAT date. Even more recently speaking, it's currently up 6.5% from 1 month ago. Yup, definitely a "failing company"... all because you cherry picked a particular point in time to reference the current stock price against...That's the way equities work.
I've already explained why the most "moronic" things within this thread are YOUR posts.Which is why the 'thought experiment' in the OP is moronic.
Whoops... I forgot that investments in private companies somehow AREN'T investments in private companies... silly me!Wrong.
Now you're adding in unnecessary requirements in order to backpedal from your stupid belief that it's not possible to invest in a private company.Sharks have NEVER gone door to door begging to invest in a private company.
Besides admitting within your repeated bogus position assignment that it in fact IS possible to invest in private companies (re: selling equity), you seem to think that "angel investing" doesn't exist. You seem to think that "venture capital" doesn't exist even though you claim to religiously watch a TV show about it.You seem to think that you can force private companies to sell you equity.
Althea seems VERY confused.So you acknowledge that investing in the company suggested is an investment, and not a prepaid expense as you recommend.
stfu, broken record idiot loser.
You are describing yourself again. You cannot blame YOUR problem on me.
Blatant lie.There was no question
quit being such a fascist fucktoid.
Continued bogus position assignment.LOL. So the investment guru has declared defeat.
Baby steps.
Continued denial of history.There was no question, and you know it.
But this bears repeatingBut this bears repeating
[h=1]Shareholders in Pinnacle West Capital (NYSENW) are in the red if they invested five years ago[/h]
Even using your own cherry picked example, 25% ≠ 100%, and one is not actually "out" any money re: such an investment until one sells one's stock at a lower price than one paid for it. You can now add mathematics to the loooong list of things that you are denying just within this thread alone.So. You are now out $50k,
One could pay it with one's dividends alone. YOU'VE ALREADY ADMITTED THIS, but now you're denying it...and you cannot pay your electric bill.
You are a scatterbrained bimbo.You are a terrible investor
You cannot blame YOUR problem on IBDaMann or anybody else.
Redefinition fallacy.fascism is the union of state and corporate power.
There is none. A meaningless buzzword.dems call it public/private partnership.
Capitalism is not fascism. Fascism is a form of socialism.reps call it capitalism.
Everyone is wrong except you, right?everyone is afraid to use the right word.
I am not a socialist. Neither is IBDaMann.because they're both for it.
your inability to acknowledge fascism is your problem.
is it because you're for it?
I do acknowledge fascism exists. Your redefinition is the fallacy. RQAA.
it's the definition.
I apologize for inadvertently mixing some government power with corporate power into my rum&coke. It really was an accident. Wait, it was a fascident.quit being such a fascist fucktoid.