A trial without witnesses is unconstitutional.

for the first time ever - the house voted to impeach down purely partisan lines

so suck it up shit stains. the shit is all over you on this one
 
Hello Frank,

Frank Apisa said:
Obviously that is exactly what they want...and what they are battling to get.

What a sad, loser group they are.
Click to expand...

Selfish bullies like Trump.

People who can't admit it when they are wrong.

Hateful, spiteful people with a chip on their shoulder who want revenge.

Peopled with messed up brains.

Racists.

Haters.

People who want to 'shake up the system.'

People who take pleasure in the misfortune of others.

Cheaters.

Misogynists.

Xenophobes.

Rich power junkies and wannabes.

All of those people like Trump.

Why should we expect anything but a travesty of justice.

This cannot stand.

We have to fix this.

We all need to volunteer and campaign for Biden.

We have to face it. None of the other candidates really stand a chance. Maybe Warren if she could get her numbers up.

But Bernie? Love the guy. Polling barely in the lead, he will prolly take a few states. It won't matter. It will be a repeat of 2016 in the primaries. Nothing has changed. All Biden needs going into the convention is to be in the hunt. All the big money super delegates will be going for Biden. Case closed. He's the nominee. He is who we have to put up with for 4 years to get rid of Trump. Not only that, we have to make sure he gets in.

I'm not lifting a finger until after the DNC.

Then I'll volunteer at the local Biden campaign. Like everyone who really understands what is going on should.

Not only for our country but for our planet and the future of all our kids and grandkids. We have to get rid of Trump to fix the climate. That can't wait. It has to be this year, this November. The end of Trump. Travesty Republican Unprincipled Misogynist President. Who got impeached for it, and got away with it. This time.
 
Teflon Don said:
Oh but you were fine with the House not letting Trump call witnesses?
Click to expand...
LOL. They don't want to mention THAT part! :D
Teflon Don said:
Spare me your fucking faux indignation
Click to expand...
Better get extra popcorn! It's gonna be one hell of an election show this year! :D
Teflon Don said:
But yeah, win at any costs. We learned from you fucks. You created this mess now sit in your own shit and suck it bitch
Click to expand...
Nah. They'll just throw their shit. What animals.
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello Frank,



Selfish bullies like Trump.

People who can't admit it when they are wrong.

Hateful, spiteful people with a chip on their shoulder who want revenge.

Peopled with messed up brains.

Racists.

Haters.

People who want to 'shake up the system.'

People who take pleasure in the misfortune of others.

Cheaters.

Misogynists.

Xenophobes.

Rich power junkies and wannabes.

All of those people like Trump.

Why should we expect anything but a travesty of justice.

This cannot stand.

We have to fix this.

We all need to volunteer and campaign for Biden.

We have to face it. None of the other candidates really stand a chance. Maybe Warren if she could get her numbers up.

But Bernie? Love the guy. Polling barely in the lead, he will prolly take a few states. It won't matter. It will be a repeat of 2016 in the primaries. Nothing has changed. All Biden needs going into the convention is to be in the hunt. All the big money super delegates will be going for Biden. Case closed. He's the nominee. He is who we have to put up with for 4 years to get rid of Trump. Not only that, we have to make sure he gets in.

I'm not lifting a finger until after the DNC.

Then I'll volunteer at the local Biden campaign. Like everyone who really understands what is going on should.

Not only for our country but for our planet and the future of all our kids and grandkids. We have to get rid of Trump to fix the climate. That can't wait. It has to be this year, this November. The end of Trump. Travesty Republican Unprincipled Misogynist President. Who got impeached for it, and got away with it. This time.
Click to expand...

Repetition fallacy. YALIFNAP.
 
Rune said:
If the President is acquitted in a trial where witnesses were banned then Autocracy has begun.
There will be no going back.
Is that really what you fools want?
To win a battle but lose everything?
Click to expand...
Horse shit. The Senate has total control on how the trial is conducted. The House had 17 witnesses and Trump had 0 . I laugh when the Des whine about having no witnesses. Where is their slam dunk case? We need to get back to doing what the Senate was designed to do make laws that better our lives. This whole impeachment thing was an attempt to weaken Trump and some Senators. It’s going to blow up in slowing and Schumer’s faces.
 
Rune said:
If the President is acquitted in a trial where witnesses were banned then Autocracy has begun.
There will be no going back.
Is that really what you fools want?
To win a battle but lose everything?
Click to expand...

The house had 17-0 witness. You ignorant fuck! You said you already proved your case in the house, so why did you need more witnesses? fucking idiot
 
Rune said:
If the President is acquitted in a trial where witnesses were banned then Autocracy has begun.
There will be no going back.
Is that really what you fools want?
To win a battle but lose everything?
Click to expand...

SEVENTEEN WITNESSES, ALL CALLED BY THE STALIN-O-CRATS, IS BEING CALLED "NO WITNESSES" BY THE CONGENITAL LIARS IN THE POLITBURO AND FAKE NEWS .
 
Rune said:
If the President is acquitted in a trial where witnesses were banned then Autocracy has begun.
There will be no going back.
Is that really what you fools want?
To win a battle but lose everything?
Click to expand...

Without witnesses? Who is attempting to sell you that line of shit? The House managers had 18 witnesses in their soviet style star chamber anti-rule of law hearing. Yes 18 (counting the witness that is under witness protection.....IG Michael Atkinson whose transcript Shitforbrains is clutching harder than his own nut sack because if the transcript were offered to the senate record it would impeach Shitforbrains.

This nonsense that Clinton had NEW WITNESSES introduced after the house impeached is total bullshit....there were no new witnesses, all the witnesses in the Clinton impeachment were the same witnesses called in the house.

The democrats had their chance to subpoena Bolton or any other NEW WITNESS they wanted during the supposed house impeachment. You came to the senate supposedly locked and loaded ready to present YOUR IMPEACHABLE evidences that you had collected in an impeachment procedure.

You can't demand NEW WITNESSES....discovery was over when you declared WE HAVE WHAT WE NEED TO IMPEACH.

GAME OVER: How THINK do you STUPID the American voters to be? :bigthink:

Indeed you are entitled to witnesses in a senate tribunal.....the same witnesses you came to the senate with, the witness testimonies that you declared was enough to impeach. You could make a motion to floor a vote on bringing in your actual impeachment witnesses...but I don't think that Shitforbrains or Cry Baby Schumer would enjoy Trump's defense team getting to question those 18 witnesses again (something they did not get the chance to do in the house)….ESPECIALLY witness number 18....Michael Atkinson.
 
Last edited:
FastLane said:
Horse shit. The Senate has total control on how the trial is conducted. The House had 17 witnesses and Trump had 0 . I laugh when the Des whine about having no witnesses. Where is their slam dunk case? We need to get back to doing what the Senate was designed to do make laws that better our lives. This whole impeachment thing was an attempt to weaken Trump and some Senators. It’s going to blow up in slowing and Schumer’s faces.
Click to expand...

The House had ZERO witnesses at the impeachment hearings. Those 17 "witnesses" you guys like to talk about were giving sworn testimony during the discovery phase last fall. If the Senate thought one or any were lying they could have called them to testify this week, but they didn't.
 
christiefan915 said:
The House had ZERO witnesses at the impeachment hearings. Those 17 "witnesses" you guys like to talk about were giving sworn testimony during the discovery phase last fall. If the Senate thought one or any were lying they could have called them to testify this week, but they didn't.
Click to expand...

I have a feeling that this is going to backfire badly on the (R)s this November. What do you think?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top