A trial without witnesses is unconstitutional.

ThatOwlWoman said:
I have a feeling that this is going to backfire badly on the (R)s this November. What do you think?
Click to expand...

YEAH...AMERICA IS THRILLED W/FOUR YEARS OF LIES BY THE TREASON-O-CRATS, ATTACKING THE DULY- ELECTED POTUS, and THEIR TREMENDOUS GRIEF OVER THE DEATH(s) OF/ADN SUPPORT FOR OUR ENEMIES.


THERE WILL BE VIDEOS....


Cy_sWPPuQi-LeqqVKDRM8KO6BlI6Xw3PG6PCV2GlY7r05Llfk1ZPqJi-KGK6YIevS13OKCJbDD3LmHksfaaXU5rTJVl_gV786msLXDy_SACoIz-en53qMvHewPsdf2MGRJGNhx3VaRKHfMuhP50
 
christiefan915 said:
The House had ZERO witnesses at the impeachment hearings. Those 17 "witnesses" you guys like to talk about were giving sworn testimony during the discovery phase last fall. If the Senate thought one or any were lying they could have called them to testify this week, but they didn't.
Click to expand...

THEIR RECORDED TESTIMONY WAS PRESENTED AS THE FOUNDATION OF THE STALIN-O-CRATS' CASE, IN THE SENATE.


MAKEUP SOME MORE BULLSHIT.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Interesting times. Guess a lot is going to depend on who eventually becomes the (D) candidate. Downstream though I think it's going to be much like 2018. You?
Click to expand...

I'm almost afraid to say in case I jinx it lol. I hope it's like 2018 but the trump toadies are going to be even more mobilized because of the impeachment.
 
christiefan915 said:
I'm almost afraid to say in case I jinx it lol. I hope it's like 2018 but the trump toadies are going to be even more mobilized because of the impeachment.
Click to expand...

That's true, they might be. Or they might figure TRE45ON's got it made in the shade and so they won't be all that energized.
 
Darth Omar said:
To be specific the ‘losers’ are the House. Myself and others warned them about rushing the vote to impeach and sending an incomplete record and crime-less articles to the Senate. One didn’t need to be a prophet to predict the outcome. Pelosi by-passed ‘the bird in the hand’ censure vote and went for the impeachment bird in the bush. All to appease her radical flank. It was a historic miscalculation on her part and will probably cost her seat as Speaker or minority leader.

You won’t like this part lol. The winner is the country. After this, future presidents [including those of your own party] should be safe from party-line impeachment votes. Had Democrats succeeded with this, the next impeachment wouldn’t take 25 years to get here. It would be more like 2-3 before the end of the decade. Abuse of power is too broad and ambiguous—and too easy for hyper-partisan House members to use to *contrive* articles of impeachment with.
Click to expand...

The country...IS THE LOSER.

You cannot see that yet. Neither could the fools who supported Hitler in Germany...until about 1944 for them.
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello Frank,



Selfish bullies like Trump.

People who can't admit it when they are wrong.

Hateful, spiteful people with a chip on their shoulder who want revenge.

Peopled with messed up brains.

Racists.

Haters.

People who want to 'shake up the system.'

People who take pleasure in the misfortune of others.

Cheaters.

Misogynists.

Xenophobes.

Rich power junkies and wannabes.

All of those people like Trump.

Why should we expect anything but a travesty of justice.

This cannot stand.

We have to fix this.

We all need to volunteer and campaign for Biden.

We have to face it. None of the other candidates really stand a chance. Maybe Warren if she could get her numbers up.

But Bernie? Love the guy. Polling barely in the lead, he will prolly take a few states. It won't matter. It will be a repeat of 2016 in the primaries. Nothing has changed. All Biden needs going into the convention is to be in the hunt. All the big money super delegates will be going for Biden. Case closed. He's the nominee. He is who we have to put up with for 4 years to get rid of Trump. Not only that, we have to make sure he gets in.

I'm not lifting a finger until after the DNC.

Then I'll volunteer at the local Biden campaign. Like everyone who really understands what is going on should.

Not only for our country but for our planet and the future of all our kids and grandkids. We have to get rid of Trump to fix the climate. That can't wait. It has to be this year, this November. The end of Trump. Travesty Republican Unprincipled Misogynist President. Who got impeached for it, and got away with it. This time.
Click to expand...

I do not do party politics under any circumstances, but I like the sound of what you are saying.

I will vote for whomever the Democrats choose to oppose the oaf in the Oval Office.
 
Ralph said:
Without witnesses? Who is attempting to sell you that line of shit? The House managers had 18 witnesses in their soviet style star chamber anti-rule of law hearing. Yes 18 (counting the witness that is under witness protection.....IG Michael Atkinson whose transcript Shitforbrains is clutching harder than his own nut sack because if the transcript were offered to the senate record it would impeach Shitforbrains.

This nonsense that Clinton had NEW WITNESSES introduced after the house impeached is total bullshit....there were no new witnesses, all the witnesses in the Clinton impeachment were the same witnesses called in the house.

The democrats had their chance to subpoena Bolton or any other NEW WITNESS they wanted during the supposed house impeachment. You came to the senate supposedly locked and loaded ready to present YOUR IMPEACHABLE evidences that you had collected in an impeachment procedure.

You can't demand NEW WITNESSES....discovery was over when you declared WE HAVE WHAT WE NEED TO IMPEACH.

GAME OVER: How THINK do you STUPID the American voters to be? :bigthink:

Indeed you are entitled to witnesses in a senate tribunal.....the same witnesses you came to the senate with, the witness testimonies that you declared was enough to impeach. You could make a motion to floor a vote on bringing in your actual impeachment witnesses...but I don't think that Shitforbrains or Cry Baby Schumer would enjoy Trump's defense team getting to question those 18 witnesses again (something they did not get the chance to do in the house)….ESPECIALLY witness number 18....Michael Atkinson.
Click to expand...

Berlin%2Bin%2B1945%2B4.jpg
 
Frank Apisa said:
I prefer asparagus.
Click to expand...

Hitler invaded Europe.

Hitler was also a rabid anti-Semite whereas Trump moved the US embassy to Jerusalem. Hitler was buddies with Arafat’s uncle or something like that.

In contrast, Democrats elected two anti-Semites to Congress. That’s pretty Hitler-esque.
 
Darth Omar said:
To be specific the ‘losers’ are the House. Myself and others warned them about rushing the vote to impeach and sending an incomplete record and crime-less articles to the Senate. One didn’t need to be a prophet to predict the outcome. Pelosi by-passed ‘the bird in the hand’ censure vote and went for the impeachment bird in the bush. All to appease her radical flank. It was a historic miscalculation on her part and will probably cost her seat as Speaker or minority leader.

You won’t like this part lol. The winner is the country. After this, future presidents [including those of your own party] should be safe from party-line impeachment votes. Had Democrats succeeded with this, the next impeachment wouldn’t take 25 years to get here. It would be more like 2-3 before the end of the decade. Abuse of power is too broad and ambiguous—and too easy for hyper-partisan House members to use to *contrive* articles of impeachment with.
Click to expand...

The House wanted a "Mulligan".

:facepalm:
 
Darth Omar said:
Hitler invaded Europe.

Hitler was also a rabid anti-Semite whereas Trump moved the US embassy to Jerusalem. Hitler was buddies with Arafat’s uncle or something like that.

In contrast, Democrats elected two anti-Semites to Congress. That’s pretty Hitler-esque.
Click to expand...

Okay...make it "the color blue."
 
Irish said:
The house had 17-0 witness. You ignorant fuck! You said you already proved your case in the house, so why did you need more witnesses? fucking idiot
Click to expand...
Information keeps being revealed. It’s natural to explore the new evidence.
 
christiefan915 said:
The House had ZERO witnesses at the impeachment hearings. Those 17 "witnesses" you guys like to talk about were giving sworn testimony during the discovery phase last fall. If the Senate thought one or any were lying they could have called them to testify this week, but they didn't.
Click to expand...

They were exactly who the Dims called "witnesses".:palm:
Even so, they did not allow the defense to call witnesses.
 
Frank Apisa said:
I do not do party politics under any circumstances, but I like the sound of what you are saying.

I will vote for whomever the Democrats choose to oppose the oaf in the Oval Office.
Click to expand...

Socialists do not believe in democracy (unless they win) :palm:
 
Stretch said:
They were exactly who the Dims called "witnesses".:palm:
Even so, they did not allow the defense to call witnesses.
Click to expand...

Yep, and they used 128 clips in the Senate ... of those witnesses testifying (plus 28k documents). :thup:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top