☪ Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand, it's a Muslim. Again. ☪

[ZenMode]

Support what?

* That Iran funds Al Qassam, Hezbollah and Islamic Jihad? Nope. This is for you to refute.
* That Iran has been the only attacker of Israel (through its proxies) since 1979? Nope. This is for you to refute.
* That there are no Hamas fighters? Nope. This is for you to refute with images of these supposed Hamas fighters.
* That the Fourth Geneva Convention, to which Israel is a signatory, defines the war crimes that Israel has committed? Nope. It's a fact.
* That the Convention against Genocide, to which Israel is a signatory, defines "Genocide"? Nope. It's a fact.

Your fiction is baseless.

[*-find: IsraelGenocide]

Nope. Who funds that actions are irrelevant. For nearly 25 years, Palestinian fighters have been periodically attacking Israel. For nearly 20 years, Hamas, a terrorist organization, has controlled Palestine. Israel has a right to defend itself regardless of who's funding the attacks. By your bass ackward logic, the US and other western countries are just as complicit in funding Hamas because much of the international aid has gone toward constructing the tunnels.

You have claimed multiple times that a) Sinwar was not the mastermind behind October 7th and he actually didn't know about it and b) Al Qassam is not the military arm of Hamas and, in fact, has no ties to Hamas.

Both of those claims have been unsupported and go against what is reported.

So, AGAIN, what do you have to backup the claims above?

 

[IBDaMann]

Give me your definition of gaslighting and then tell me how you are not gaslighting me.

Gaslighting is a form of manipulation. I am not manipulating you.

 

[ZenMode]

Al Qassam is Iran's proxy. Iran attacked Israel. Iran is the only attacker of Israel.


It is your claim that Sinwar was behind the attack. You can't prove that he even knew anything about the attack until it occurred, much less that he was somehow involved. Ergo, this is another wild claim of yours that you cannot support.


You have provided no rational basis for believing that Iran would cast OPSEC to the wind and tell the world about that secret attack before it happens.

Who funds that actions are irrelevant. For nearly 25 years, Palestinian fighters have been periodically attacking Israel. For nearly 20 years, Hamas, a terrorist organization, has controlled Palestine. Israel has a right to defend itself regardless of who's funding the attacks. By your bass ackward logic, the US and other western countries are just as complicit in funding Hamas because much of the international aid has gone toward constructing the tunnels.

You have claimed multiple times that a) Sinwar was not the mastermind behind October 7th and he actually didn't know about it and b) Al Qassam is not the military arm of Hamas and, in fact, has no ties to Hamas.

Both of those claims have been unsupported and go against what is reported.

So, AGAIN, what do you have to backup the claims above?

 

[IBDaMann]

Who funds that actions are irrelevant.

It's everything, because the Ayatollah doesn't fund anything for anyone's purposes but his own.

For nearly 25 years, Palestinian fighters have been periodically attacking Israel.

Nope. Only Iran has attacked Israel through its proxies. You can't show otherwise.

For nearly 20 years, Hamas, a terrorist organization,

Show me images of these Hamas fighters, otherwise I'm not buying it.

has controlled Palestine.

There is no Palestine.

Israel has a right to defend itself

... as did Nazi Germany.

You have claimed multiple times that a) Sinwar was not the mastermind behind October 7th and he actually didn't know about it

That was not my claim.

and b) Al Qassam is not the military arm of Hamas

Correct. Al Qassam is a proxy of Iran.

and, in fact, has no ties to Hamas.

Correct.

 

[ZenMode]

It's everything, because the Ayatollah doesn't fund anything for anyone's purposes but his own.


Nope. Only Iran has attacked Israel through its proxies. You can't show otherwise.


Show me images of these Hamas fighters, otherwise I'm not buying it.


There is no Palestine.



... as did Nazi Germany.


That was not my claim.


Correct. Al Qassam is a proxy of Iran.



Correct.

For the fourth time, provide support for these claims. It's actually probably been more than four requests because I asked multiple times over a month ago.

1. Prove that Sinwar was not the mastermind behind October 7th as has been reported
2. Prove that Hamas/Sinwar had no knowledge of October 7th happening until it started as it has been reported he did.
3. Prove that al Qassam is not a military arm of Hamas, as has been reported.

And again, those who are attacking Israel are coming from Gaza/Palestine and have for decades. Russia is fighting Ukaine with N. Korean fighters. Should Ukraine attack N. Korea of should they fight who is attacking them, as Israel is doing.

 

[moon]

I distance myself from your wording. The Israelis (not "Jews") want Arab children dead out of RACIST hatred.

' Jewz ' signifies Israeli Jews .

 

[IBDaMann]

For the fourth time, provide support for these claims.

Nope. The ball is in your court to refute everything I wrote. It's common knowledge. You have fallen under the sway of media disinformation.

You are capable of following the money.

 

[IBDaMann]

' Jewz ' signifies Israeli Jews .

I prefer to stick with the word "Israelis" to refer to Israelis instead of "Jews", the word "Gazans" to refer to Gazans instead of "Palestinians," and the words "Arabs" or "Arab Semites" to refer to the targets of Israeli HATRED instead of "Palestinians."

 

[ZenMode]

Nope. The ball is in your court to refute everything I wrote. It's common knowledge. You have fallen under the sway of media disinformation.

You are capable of following the money.

Again, you've provided no sources. You've provided nothing to show it's "common knowledge". In fact, it's the opposite.

So, no, nothing you are repeating is common knowledge.

I've provided sources for my claims.

Where are your sources?

If you tap dance your way through another post, I'll consider it to be your admission that you have nothing.

 

[IBDaMann]

Again, you've provided no sources.

You need a source? OK. Iran.

You've provided nothing to show it's "common knowledge".

You don't get to hide behind your wasted life during which you deliberately didn't learn anything. You don't get to hide behind your refusal to independently research anything.

 

[ZenMode]

You need a source? OK. Iran.


You don't get to hide behind your wasted life during which you deliberately didn't learn anything. You don't get to hide behind your refusal to independently research anything.

As I mentioned in the last post, your admission is acknowledged and accepted.

 

[IBDaMann]

Again, you've provided no sources.

I gave you Iran. Again, you've provided no images of your supposed HAMAS FIGHTERS.

You've provided nothing to show it's "common knowledge".

It's common knowledge in Iran and Israel. I didn't say that it somehow was not a common misconception elsewhere.

 

[ZenMode]

I gave you Iran. Again, you've provided no images of your supposed HAMAS FIGHTERS.


It's common knowledge in Iran and Israel. I didn't say that it somehow was not a common misconception elsewhere.

You think al Qassam headbands prove the points I'm questioning. You are intentionally playing dumb.

I asked you to support two claims. I listed those two things many times.

Until you have something beyond, "I said so and everyone knows it's true", I'm considering you to be tapped out.

 

[IBDaMann]

You think al Qassam headbands prove the points I'm questioning.

Actually, the complete absence of images of Hamas fighters destroys any and all of your refutations and arguments.

I asked you to support two claims.

You first. Images of Hamas fighters. Until you do, there's nothing I need to do. Oh, and you won't be producing any Hamas fighters because there aren't any.

Have a great day.