☪ Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand, it's a Muslim. Again. ☪

the USA and its satellites having bombed and otherwise attacked their countries.
Not this particular individual's.

Just out of curiosity, what bombing do you believe the USA has done in Afghanistan in the last 20 years?
 
"The verse of the Holy Quran is often mentioned to malign Islam. The verse does not say infidels it says idolaters. (9:5) And when the forbidden months have passed, kill the idolaters wherever you find them and take them prisoners, and beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they repent and observe Prayer and pay the Zakat, then leave their way free. Surely, Allah is Most Forgiving, Merciful.

This verse, chapter 9 verse 5, is often used as evidence that Islam allows killing of non-Muslims, but what is not recognized is the context and history behind these verses. The history of this verse is that when Prophet Muhammad(sa) began preaching the unity of God he was persecuted for 13 years, much as Prophets Abraham and Jesus were. Since Muslims who are being persecuted are encouraged to leave for safer areas, rather than create disorder, Muhammad(sa) and his followers migrated to Medina. After they left, the Meccans attacked them in Medina on and off for a period of nine years until Chapter 9 was revealed.



Muslims would say that, wouldn't they?
 
The Quran itself doesn't mention 72 virgins as a reward in Paradise. The concept comes from certain hadiths and interpretations of those hadiths vary. This answer explores the Islamic concept of Paradise and the rewards for the righteous, while clarifying the hadith about 72 virgins.

Muslims believe in the concept of Paradise, a reward for the righteous in the afterlife (Surah Al-Baqarah [The Cow] 2:82). Paradise is described as a place of eternal bliss and beauty, with various delights for those who enter (Surah ?????? [The Most Gracious] 55:46-78). A common misconception exists about the Quran promising 72 virgins to all Muslims in Paradise. This answer will look at the concept of rewards in Paradise and clarify the hadith mentioning 72 virgins.

Conclusion
The Quran itself doesn't mention 72 virgins as a reward in Paradise. Islamic descriptions of Paradise emphasize spiritual rewards and closeness to Allah (swt) as the ultimate source of joy and fulfillment. The concept of 72 houris stems from a specific hadith, whose interpretation deserves careful consideration within the broader context of Islamic teachings.

Misinterpretations of these hadiths can over-emphasize physical aspects and detract from the true essence of Paradise. It's crucial to remember that Paradise is about more than physical pleasures-it's about spiritual bliss, attaining God's favor and living in harmony with His divine purpose.

For Muslims seeking a deeper understanding of Paradise and divine rewards, it's advisable to consult with qualified Islamic scholars and reputable sources that provide balanced and informed perspectives.

 
The Quran itself doesn't mention 72 virgins as a reward in Paradise. The concept comes from certain hadiths and interpretations of those hadiths vary. This answer explores the Islamic concept of Paradise and the rewards for the righteous, while clarifying the hadith about 72 virgins.

Muslims believe in the concept of Paradise, a reward for the righteous in the afterlife (Surah Al-Baqarah [The Cow] 2:82). Paradise is described as a place of eternal bliss and beauty, with various delights for those who enter (Surah ?????? [The Most Gracious] 55:46-78). A common misconception exists about the Quran promising 72 virgins to all Muslims in Paradise. This answer will look at the concept of rewards in Paradise and clarify the hadith mentioning 72 virgins.

Conclusion
The Quran itself doesn't mention 72 virgins as a reward in Paradise. Islamic descriptions of Paradise emphasize spiritual rewards and closeness to Allah (swt) as the ultimate source of joy and fulfillment. The concept of 72 houris stems from a specific hadith, whose interpretation deserves careful consideration within the broader context of Islamic teachings.

Misinterpretations of these hadiths can over-emphasize physical aspects and detract from the true essence of Paradise. It's crucial to remember that Paradise is about more than physical pleasures-it's about spiritual bliss, attaining God's favor and living in harmony with His divine purpose.

For Muslims seeking a deeper understanding of Paradise and divine rewards, it's advisable to consult with qualified Islamic scholars and reputable sources that provide balanced and informed perspectives.



According to Muslims ... again. :palm:
 
Is Islam a Religion of Peace?


[Not an Islamic scholar] Gad Saad's commentary on Islam has been contentious, leading to debates about the accuracy and motives behind his statements. Here's a nuanced examination based on available information:
  • Criticism and Accusations of Misrepresentation:
    • Selective Focus: Critics argue that Saad sometimes focuses on extreme interpretations or actions by some Muslims to generalize about Islam as a whole. This can lead to an oversimplified narrative that might not capture the full spectrum of Islamic beliefs and practices.
    • Historical Context: There are claims that he might overlook the historical context or the diversity within Islamic thought, potentially misrepresenting the religion by not acknowledging reforms, interpretations, or the vast majority of Muslims who do not support extremism.
    • Public Perception: Posts on platforms like X have shown a divide. Some users support his critiques, while others accuse him of misrepresenting Islam for political or ideological reasons. For instance, some posts suggest he might downplay or reinterpret historical Islamic conquests or the complexity of geopolitical issues involving Muslim-majority countries.

  • From a critic's viewpoint: He might be seen as misrepresenting or exaggerating certain aspects for an agenda, thus not providing a balanced view.
  • From his defenders' perspective: He might be viewed as speaking uncomfortable truths about aspects of Islam that are often shielded from critique.

Grok
 
Question:

The Quran says, “Slay them wherever you find them…” which abrogates all the peaceful verses in the Quran and lets Muslims kill any non-Muslim they want.

Answer:

In the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful

This verse commands Muslims to defend their community against idolaters who violated their peace treaty obligations and were waging a war of aggression.

The verse is applicable only to hostile armies and not to non-Muslims in general. We should look at the entire chapter and interpret the verses comprehensively and consistently, rather than taking one verse out of context.

The Arabic is unequivocal in its command form: “فَاقْتُلُوهُمْ حَيْثُ ثَقِفْتُمُوهُمْ” (“Kill them wherever you find them”). There is no magical conditional wording within that specific sentence limiting it to only those engaged in hostilities. The same verse ends: “ذَٰلِكَ جَزَاءُ الْكَافِرِينَ” (“Such is the recompense of the disbelievers”). It explicitly uses the word kafirīn— “disbelievers”—which shows that the verse's lethal action is to be directed not simply at some idolaters with a peace treaty, but against those identified as unbelievers.
 
[Not an Islamic scholar] Gad Saad's commentary on Islam has been contentious, leading to debates about the accuracy and motives behind his statements. Here's a nuanced examination based on available information:
  • Criticism and Accusations of Misrepresentation:
    • Selective Focus: Critics argue that Saad sometimes focuses on extreme interpretations or actions by some Muslims to generalize about Islam as a whole. This can lead to an oversimplified narrative that might not capture the full spectrum of Islamic beliefs and practices.
    • Historical Context: There are claims that he might overlook the historical context or the diversity within Islamic thought, potentially misrepresenting the religion by not acknowledging reforms, interpretations, or the vast majority of Muslims who do not support extremism.
    • Public Perception: Posts on platforms like X have shown a divide. Some users support his critiques, while others accuse him of misrepresenting Islam for political or ideological reasons. For instance, some posts suggest he might downplay or reinterpret historical Islamic conquests or the complexity of geopolitical issues involving Muslim-majority countries.

  • From a critic's viewpoint: He might be seen as misrepresenting or exaggerating certain aspects for an agenda, thus not providing a balanced view.
  • From his defenders' perspective: He might be viewed as speaking uncomfortable truths about aspects of Islam that are often shielded from critique.

Grok


Anti-semite, huh?
 
You're a parrot repeating the interpretations of bigots.
Your knee-jerk equivocation is standard leftist dishonesty.

You don't even understand that the Qur'an was written in the 7th century, in a 22-year period, and detailed the wars on the Arabian peninsula.
You don't even understand that Muslims are taught that the Arabic language is the language of Allah.

Maybe you should consider going to the source, instead of swallowing drivel by phonies.
At least 3 surahs emphasize this point, stating that an Arabic Q'ran is needed for all to understand.

"The verse of the Holy Quran is often mentioned to malign Islam. The verse does not say infidels it says idolaters
You are lying, like a typical leftist. The Arabic word for "infidel" is كَافِر (kafir) and means "unbeliever," whether or not he is an idolater. The word for "idolater" is مُشْرِك (mushrik) and that is not the word in question.
 
According to Muslims ... again. :palm:
Have you read the Quran? Have you researched any websites of Islamic scholars?

 
The Arabic is unequivocal in its command form: “فَاقْتُلُوهُمْ حَيْثُ ثَقِفْتُمُوهُمْ” (“Kill them wherever you find them”). There is no magical conditional wording within that specific sentence limiting it to only those engaged in hostilities. The same verse ends: “ذَٰلِكَ جَزَاءُ الْكَافِرِينَ” (“Such is the recompense of the disbelievers”). It explicitly uses the word kafirīn— “disbelievers”—which shows that the verse's lethal action is to be directed not simply at some idolaters with a peace treaty, but against those identified as unbelievers.
"First of all, it must be clearly understood that there is no place in the Holy Quran in which Muslims are commanded to kill ‘infidels of the world’ as the person asserted. This is totally false, and a blatant lie and misinterpretation of the teachings of Islam. It seems that the Muslim to whom the other person was speaking, was not a scholar of Islam nor was he aware of the true teachings of Islam.

There is absolutely no ‘order’, ‘command’ or teaching in the Holy Quran or traditions of the Prophet (S.A) that gives an allowance for a Muslim to kill anyone who is not of his faith. It seems that the writer of the article was ‘putting words in the Muslim’s mouth’, and did not give him a chance to explain anything, or he simply wanted to present the ‘idea of a few radical Muslims’ as a teaching of Islam. One which does not exist in Islam.

Look at the statement of the writer, ‘So, let me make sure I have this straight. All followers of Allah have been commanded to kill everyone who is not of your faith so they can have a place in heaven. Is that correct?’

This question of the writer shows that he had already ‘fixed his notion of Islam’ in his mind, and he wanted to get it correct. It does not matter what the answer of the Muslim guy was, since anyone can say anything today (as we see in the media). What really matters is whether or not the ‘notion’ of the writer was in accordance to the teachings of Islam. Anyone who has a bit of true information of Islam will immediately conclude that the writer’s ‘notion of Islam’ was totally unfounded and absurd.

How can this statement be true, when the Prophet (S.A) himself signed a peace treaty with the Christians and Jews to live in harmony in the city of Madina, and he continued to live with them until he died.

How can the writer’s claim be correct, when the Holy Quran has respectfully addressed the Jews and Christians (who are not of the faith of the Muslims) to be ‘people of the Book’. In other words, they have not even been referred to as unbelievers, instead, the Quran acknowledged the fact that they were given true divine scriptures and had true Prophets.


The ‘fabricated understanding’ of the writer also becomes glaring when we look at the fact that the Holy Quran has given the allowance for Muslim men to marry Christian and Jewish women, and to live with them in love and happiness. When this teaching has been given in the Quran, how can one say that Muslims are ordered to kill those who do not belong to their faith?

 
Have you read the Quran? Have you researched any websites of Islamic scholars?


dancing-cat-cat-meme.gif


Cute dance, pretty kitty, but it won't work.

Why would I trust a Muslim fairy tale book to tell the truth about anything?

I judge Islamists by their deadly deeds.
 
dancing-cat-cat-meme.gif


Cute dance, pretty kitty, but it won't work.

Why would I trust a Muslim fairy tale book to tell the truth about anything?

I judge Islamists by their deadly deeds.
You don't judge Christians by their deadly deeds. You don't refer to killers by their religion unless they're Muslims.
 
You're a parrot repeating the interpretations of bigots.
Calling me a ‘parrot of bigots’ doesn’t change the literal words in 9:5. If you believe you have a compelling explanation for why the text says ‘kill the idolaters wherever you find them,’ then present it. But just insulting me doesn’t nullify the fact that this verse does command Muslims to kill unbelievers.
You don't even understand that the Qur'an was written in the 7th century, in a 22-year period, and detailed the wars on the Arabian peninsula. Maybe you should consider going to the source, instead of swallowing drivel by phonies.
Of course I understand the Qur’an was written by a child rapist and pedophile over two decades and references specific battles of that era. But the verse itself, 9:5, limit its message to one historical conflict. If it did it would specify exactly what individual group it was referring to. Instead, it literally says: ‘kill the unbelievers wherever you find them.’
"The verse of the Holy Quran is often mentioned to malign Islam. The verse does not say infidels it says idolaters. (9:5) And when the forbidden months have passed, kill the idolaters wherever you find them and take them prisoners, and beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they repent and observe Prayer and pay the Zakat, then leave their way free. Surely, Allah is Most Forgiving, Merciful.

This verse, chapter 9 verse 5, is often used as evidence that Islam allows killing of non-Muslims, but what is not recognized is the context and history behind these verses. The history of this verse is that when Prophet Muhammad(sa) began preaching the unity of God he was persecuted for 13 years, much as Prophets Abraham and Jesus were. Since Muslims who are being persecuted are encouraged to leave for safer areas, rather than create disorder, Muhammad(sa) and his followers migrated to Medina. After they left, the Meccans attacked them in Medina on and off for a period of nine years until Chapter 9 was revealed.



See my previous post on your mistranslations
 
The Arabic is unequivocal in its command form: “فَاقْتُلُوهُمْ حَيْثُ ثَقِفْتُمُوهُمْ” (“Kill them wherever you find them”). There is no magical conditional wording within that specific sentence limiting it to only those engaged in hostilities. The same verse ends: “ذَٰلِكَ جَزَاءُ الْكَافِرِينَ” (“Such is the recompense of the disbelievers”). It explicitly uses the word kafirīn— “disbelievers”—which shows that the verse's lethal action is to be directed not simply at some idolaters with a peace treaty, but against those identified as unbelievers.
To be fair, the surah you are citing is tightly cropped and devoid of context. Where the Q'ran calls for killing the infidels wherever they are (there are two such occasions) it refers to those who persecute Muslims for their Muslim faith, and who are attacking them in war/battle ... adding that any infidel who seeks protection from Muslims must be forthwith granted such.
 
To be fair, the surah you are citing is tightly cropped and devoid of context. Where the Q'ran calls for killing the infidels wherever they are (there are two such occasions) it refers to those who persecute Muslims for their Muslim faith, and who are attacking them in war/battle ... adding that any infidel who seeks protection from Muslims must be forthwith granted such.


But it doesn't work out that way in practice, does it?
 
Back
Top