Into the Night
Verified User
You can't be a child and be unborn, you can only be one or the other.
Go learn biology.
You can't be a child and be unborn, you can only be one or the other.
^ Trolling, Sybil-style
No comment about the bone I tossed you regarding your fake forum, Sybil? That's quite a piece of work you've generated there. How long did it take you to put it together?
Not a fake forum. Insult fallacies. Inversion fallacy. Trolling.
Of course not. It has you, yourself and Irene in it, Sybil. LOL
YALSA. Lie. Trolling.
proof of that is the fact that humans let people kill their unborn children.......
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Dude, your myopia non-withstanding...you are focusing on why they went into the system.....that doesn't change the fact that once in the system the clock stops between 18-21.....and the links I sourced point to the FACT that there are A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER of kids in the system who age out.
Also, from one of my links that you obviously didn't read: More than 20% of the children who are currently in foster care are aged 3 or younger.
I focus on why they went into the system because the only ones who age out are those who went into the system as teenagers......
any child in the foster system aged three or younger is waiting for the courts to terminate the parental rights of parents who refuse to release the child for adoption......
why pretend these statistics are relevant for mothers who DON'T want their children......
And the fact that men here in America make laws preventing women to have a choice, no different than the Taliban do in Afghanistan.
You Republican men are not far from the Taliban in the way you try to control women.
Your first sentence is an ASSUMPTION, as nothing in what you or I produced states such in no uncertain terms. Also you conveniently left out pertinent information that points to what I stated (you always leave out what doesn't fit your agenda...a stupid move given this is a printed medium). Now if you can't connect the dots, here: https://www.americanprogress.org/iss...option-option/
The only pretender here is YOU...and a pretty dumb pretense on your part that can easily be checked with a mouse clik. So, you're proven wrong here, and there is no logical, rational reason for the current Texas law. Carry on.
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Actually, you need to read carefully and comprehensively, and remember that the original point of contention was my pointed out the sheer stupidity in enacting a law that guarantees more kids into the foster care system is not good, given that you have a percentage that age out. From your source:
Exit reasons for those that exited care before their 19th birthday
Emancipation (often referred to as “aging out”) In the USA , 77% out of 6,154 polled in 2015
And we're not talking just about abused kids:https://www.americanprogress.org/iss...option-option/
This is just one aspect as to why the new Texas abortion law just doesn't make sense. The major point is that all those red state stupes who wail about an over-bearing federal gov't controlling their lives seem to have no problem with the Stasi like local gov't regarding a woman's personal medical choice. Hypocrisy much?
why is this difficult for you to understand.......if a mother does not want her baby there is a waiting list of people who do..........the only kids in foster care more than a month or two are those who's parents do NOT want to give them up for adoption......those who are under investigation by child protective services for neglect, abuse or worse......
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Your first sentence is an ASSUMPTION, as nothing in what you or I produced states such in no uncertain terms. Also you conveniently left out pertinent information that points to what I stated (you always leave out what doesn't fit your agenda...a stupid move given this is a printed medium). Now if you can't connect the dots, here: https://www.americanprogress.org/iss...option-option/
The only pretender here is YOU...and a pretty dumb pretense on your part that can easily be checked with a mouse clik. So, you're proven wrong here, and there is no logical, rational reason for the current Texas law. Carry on.
dude this is really quite simple.....babies get adopted quickly.......teenagers do not......get your head out of your ass and stop deflecting with your stupidity.......by the way, your link is as defective as your brain......
so telling them to not give in to all urges is religious radicalism?
Although some of her past bits rubbed me the wrong way, Sarah Silverman has always been an entertaining comedienne and actress. Here, she is DEAD ON TARGET with the regards to the OP. Check it out:
Sarah Silverman is hot.
Jimmy Fallon passed on her after five years or so. Have you seen/heard her break up song “I’m fucking Matt Damon”? It’s hilarious. Good production values too.I'll buy that!
adoption is an option......
So unless you live under a rock, Texas has recently passed laws that virtually makes abortion impossible for the average citizen. Well, here's whats currently going on in the state that wants to force women victims of rape & incest to bring that pregnancy to term. Yep, they're well prepared for all those unwanted kids:
https://www.literacytexas.org/impac...,to a national average of $11,762 per student.
Just curious, if the idea to stop abortions is because it's murder- why are they allowing abortions or murders under 6 weeks?
Wouldn't you want to eliminate all murders of fetuses- even those under 6 weeks?
Please advise me on what is the logic of this crazy bill?
It seems a little conflicting to say the least.