Abortion Follies: Texas style

"Unborn baby" is a paradox.
No, it is not.
A woman can do whatever the fuck she wants to the fetus growing inside of her,
Murder is not a right.
and it's none of your fucking business unless you are OK with us ripping a kidney from you to save the life of someone you don't know and will never meet.

Bodily autonomy works both ways, pal...so if you're going to force a woman to birth her rapists baby, then you should be forced to relinquish one of your kidneys to save someone's life.

Something tells me that you'd scream "bodily autonomy" as you're being dragged into the OR to have one of your kidneys removed to save some stranger's life.

False equivalence fallacy. A baby is not a kidney.
 
Unalienable rights. Get a clue, Sybil.
Apparently you have lost context completely again. Go back and read the posts and try to regain your lost context.
Who is Sybil? You keep using that name.
Two weeks after second shot.

Get a clue, Sybil.

Awesome. How much ivermectin have you injected so far? Any other veterinary medicines? Bleach?
Another pivot fallacy. Again you are wandering into hallucinations and random statements.

Ivermectin is not limited to use in animals. It is also used by doctors for human use to treat certain parasites and has been for some time. It has shown some effectiveness against covid19 as well.

You continue to spew your senseless religion, and often just purely random statements that have no bearing or meaning to the conversation.

You own hatred has made you dumb.
 
No shit. Congrats on recognizing that abortion and pedophilia aren't specifically mentioned in the Bible. Does that mean you'll have to go back to bashing gays? :laugh:

I support the reasoning that abortion should be safe, legal and rare. Unfortunately, too many dipshits in the US are blocking sex education and contraceptives to keep it "rare".

What's to bash? Such activity does nothing to create offspring, and may easily damage the later ability to do so. In the old days, gays were stoned to death according to Leviticus 20:13. It's a lot more tolerated now, of course. One of the many evils of society today.
 
That's his fall back line for every thing he can't logically or factually refute or disprove. Hell, half the time it's not properly applied and doesn't make sense....which is why I keep the little dope on IA for a month or two.....less clutter, less headache.

Bulverism fallacy.
 
As the chronology of the posts shows, you presented a source material fact focusing on on State. What I did was just read carefully and comprehensively the material presented, and then demonstrated how it DOES NOT support the assertion you originally made. I did this by highlighting the information from your source that does this.

And in typical fashion, you just blow smoke in denial, but you don't DARE address the point I put forth directly. In short, your intellectually cowardice/dishonesty comes to light again......just as I previously predicted. Carry on, my little American Taliban wanna be.

Void authority fallacy. Void argument fallacy. Insult fallacies. No argument presented.
 
:rolleyes: Another pro-life lunkhead squawking long ago disproven propaganda. I find it fascinating how you just casually dismiss (alleged)Here stupid, learn something:


The Texas Abortion Ban Hinges On 'Fetal Heartbeat.' Doctors Call That Misleading

https://www.npr.org/sections/health...l-term-but-its-still-used-in-laws-on-abortion


And if memory serves me correctly, you had well over 1 million abortions in the USA last year....so you just say tough cookies to over 30 thousand women who were raped by family or stranger...you have that baby. Then turn it over to social services to be put into foster care and hope it gets a permanent home before 18 years of age....meantime, a school system that inadequately educates it's youth will be there.

You're a real piece of work, pal. Fortunately for the rest of us, a theocracy America ain't.

Rape is a valid reason for abortion. The killing is upon the head of the rapist.
This is not about religion or theocracy. Straw man fallacy.
 
I took you out of IA to see if you've actually started educating yourself on the subjects you comment on.

Sadly, you haven't. Instead of fact based, logical and rational responses to the OP, you squawk the tired, long disproved rhetoric of the pro-life lunkheads.
Attempted proof by circular argument (fundamentalism). Argument of the Stick fallacy. Learn what 'fact' means. Learn English. You deny logic. You are still locked in multiple paradoxes. It is YOU being irrational. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox.
1. Please provide the ME report from ANY state where abortions were reported as "murdered children".
Irrelevant.
Then explain to the reading audience how a CHOICE by a pregnant woman (not me, I'm a man) is any of my business if I am NOT the potential father?
Killing the unborn is killing. You don't seem to recognize that.
Also, explain where in the Constitution gives YOU the "right" to determine that woman's choice...
It is not the women's choice to kill the child for convenience.
especially if jokers like you bitch and moan about social services constantly?
Straw man fallacy.
2. For your information, rape and incest crimes are reported in every state in America on an annual basis. I believe that last year between 10 and 30 thousand abortions were due to rape and incest (numbers depend upon source material, time of polling).
News polls are completely meaningless. Argument from randU fallacy. Random numbers are not data.
So, theocratic thugs like you would condemn those women to bring that pregnancy to term...
Conclusion based on random numbers. Invalid.
forget your allegiance to eliminate welfare, Obamacare.
Taking money from people by force (taxes) and giving it to others is not welfare. It's theft.
Forget stats regarding a faltering adoption/foster child care system.
More random numbers? What stats?
Nope, your personal religious bent must be sated even though you don't give a damn about strangers.
In fact, he does. He cares about the unborn life. So do I.
3. Being forced to bring a pregnancy born of rape/incest isn't an "inconvenience", it's a sin! Being forced to bring an accidental/unplanned pregnancy to term that cannot be given proper financial security (food, clothing, education), isn't "inconvenience", it's a criminal act.
Rape is a valid reason to abort. The killing is upon the rapist's head.
But hey, no one is forcing YOU to do anything, so you don't give a damn about the consequences of the actions you will force on others. You would have done well during the Spanish Inquisition.
Did you know there are laws in this country?
People like you would like to remove anyone who does not adhere to your particular mindset....be political or social.
You are describing yourself and other Democrats again.
You've demonstrated this time and again over the years with your rants against Obama,
Obama's an idiot. Straw man fallacy.
your support of Cheeto Jeezus, etc.
Who is 'Cheeto Jeezus'?
Thing is, you don't have the guts to just come out and admit it, much less suit up for some black shirt/Stasi organization and commit the murder yourself.
What murder? The one you are supporting??? WTF??????????
 
You and all your theocratic thug buddies keep spewing that bull horn. It's misleading and has been debunked several times by myself and others. Either read the thread or spare us your chicken little BS, as I tire of repeating myself to the willfully ignorant. >pew-pew-pew<

Attempted proof by circular argument (fundamentalism). Circular argument fallacy.
 
Having noticed your continuous hissy fit through out this thread, let me just put your 'one trick pony meme' mind to rest:

- YOU don't give a damn about women in general, as YOU would condemn over 10,000 to 30,000 women per year to bring a pregnancy born of rape/incest to term....while at the same time bitching and moaning about social services, Obamacare, etc.

- For someone who has wailed about the "deep state" and "lib'rul commies" taking over America, you sure as hell don't have a problem with enforcing a theocratic edict on other people ....mainly because it doesn't effect you personally. You'd have done well during the Spanish Inquisition with that mindset.

- Before you trot out the SOS responses, try skimming through the thread to see how easily your brethren were put to rest when using old and tired pro-life propaganda....saves you time and effort, and spares others re-reading the SOS.

- Now, if you want to endorse theocratic thuggery, go right ahead. Just remember that we just spent 20 years and a LOT of lives fighting and exact same mindset in Afghanistan. Carry on.

One trick pony. Argument by repetition fallacy.
 
You can parrot that BS until doomsday...pity for you the Texas law is very specific...which dooms it to failure when dealing with medical science https://www.npr.org/sections/health...l-term-but-its-still-used-in-laws-on-abortion
Science is not NPR. Science is a set of falsifiable theories. A heartbeat is a medical term and also a common term.
And as I've demonstrated, you're one sick religious fanatic to force between 10,000 to 30,000 women a year to bring a pregnancy born of rape/incest to term. (yeah, stupid....look up the number of abortions each year, then check various sources from pro & anti for the numbers).
Fixation. Argument by repetition fallacy. This has already been addressed.
The new Texas law is nothing more than theocratic thuggery reminiscent of the Spanish Inquisition....of which you seem well suited for.
Fixation. Argument by repetition fallacy. This too has already been addressed.
 
Apparently you have lost context completely again. Go back and read the posts and try to regain your lost context.

Who is Sybil? You keep using that name.
Disagreed. You object but never explain why. You throw out your psychobabble/Internet buzzwords without ever saying anything. Your forum is like that too. Mostly a collection of cut'n'paste with insipid comments and uninspired conclusions. A clear view into a person's mind. As all blogs, whatever their form, often are.

I'm more curious about motivation, not your above average technical expertise in writing, setting put forum, trying to maintain socks. Socks rarely work due to the human inability to create multiple 3D Avatars....unless they are like Sybil. LOL

Since split personalities are rarer than hens teeth, socks are limited to 1D (a person who only posts articles and no commentary) or 2D (posts articles, rarely comments. Very rarely comments on personal data since lies must be remembered..and thus very limited or risk failure.)

You're good on the will-to-do part. I like that. Not sure about your logic all the time. Are you completely sane but autistic? That's something more special if true.

Mental illness runs a gamut like "list of human diseases". Lots of variation and severity. The human brain functions on a level that cannot, foreseeably, be duplicated by design. It can only be grown.

Autism is interesting to me for many reasons. It's a side avenue. The US Army has a main avenue where people are in the "combat arms". There is a side avenue for "Specialists". People with a very specific expertise, often requiring specific skills. Autism strikes me like that, but I don't know much about it.
 
Last edited:
and it's none of your fucking business unless you are OK with us ripping a kidney from you to save the life of someone you don't know and will never meet.
THIS is why you should be vehemently OPPOSING any and all mask mandates, vaccine mandates, and all other forms of medical tyranny. Showing acceptance of some forms of medical tyranny is only opening the door for other more invasive forms of medical tyranny to be forced upon you, including forced kidney transplants "to help people on dialysis" and forced gastric bypass surgeries "to save the medical system money from fat asses".
 
THIS is why you should be vehemently OPPOSING any and all mask mandates, vaccine mandates, and all other forms of medical tyranny. Showing acceptance of some forms of medical tyranny is only opening the door for other more invasive forms of medical tyranny to be forced upon you, including forced kidney transplants "to help people on dialysis" and forced gastric bypass surgeries "to save the medical system money from fat asses".

You want to force women to birth the fetus a rapist put in them because of your compulsion to gain control.

There is nothing else at play with you; control is all there is.

You have no control over anything in your life, so to compensate for that, you seek to control others.

So if that's what you believe, then you should be perfectly OK with someone ripping a kidney from you in order to save someone else's life.

I don't give a shit what else you have to say about it.
 
Back
Top