Too stupid.
Adm. Alvin Holsey resigned over Hegseth's Venezuela boat strike orders
- Thread starter Guno צְבִי
- Start date
Too stupid.
Why the stupid lies? Did anyone force him to resign? I am pretty sure he retired with a very nice pension. No admiral is going to give that up.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
All MAGAt cracker retards believe what they are told to believe by their draft-dodging, oath-breaking Pedo President. They should all be treated like domestic enemies of the Constitution.@RB 60 @T. A. Gardner @FastLane @Damocles , here is what Pam Bondi submitted to the Supreme Court while working for a right wing think tank.
Do you guys believe Bondi broke the law? Was wrong to believe and state that?
Too Funny. I hear he is Richard again. I wonder if that is correct.
QP!
Verified User
you notice how @T. A. Gardner , @RB 60 , @Damocles , @FastLane have nothing to say when it is magats such as Pete Hegseth, and Pam Bondi, two of the top in Trump admin saying the EXACT SAME THINGS as the Dems said that this group lost their shit over.
But we can expect and bet on their hypocrisy as Pete Hegseth continues to try and find a way to punish those who were in the military and said the same basic thing he has said but a tamer version.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Trivial objections fallacy.@RB 60 @T. A. Gardner @FastLane @Damocles , here is what Pam Bondi submitted to the Supreme Court while working for a right wing think tank.
Do you guys believe Bondi broke the law? Was wrong to believe and state that?
No, Bondi did not break the law. Her statement is correct. Narco-terrorists are not "civilians." They are terrorists wearing civilian clothes. That makes the doubly a target.
How about genocide for illegal immigrants? That something you'd like also?
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
"Genocide for illegal immigrants?" Really? Where is the deliberate and mass killing of illegal immigrants happening right now?
Just wondering. You think killing innocent people off shore of Venezuela is justified.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
People driving a boat filled with drugs and trying to evade law enforcement aren't "innocent." They are criminals and either are or are associated with narco-terrorism. That makes them a valid target.
You'd be the first to prove that. Even Trump does not say this.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Preponderance of the evidence. Proof beyond reasonable doubt is not needed, and a drug boat in international waters filled with non-US citizens doesn't get "Constitutional Rights" any more than an enemy in war does.
duhhhhhhhhhhhhhh picture duhhhhhhhhhhhhhPreponderance of the evidence. Proof beyond reasonable doubt is not needed, and a drug boat in international waters filled with non-US citizens doesn't get "Constitutional Rights" any more than an enemy in war does.
bye
QP!
Verified User
So you agree there is nothing wrong with her saying that "the military would not carry out an illegal order by the POTUS... and they are required not to do so"?
You agree this is a correct thing to say and not just for the single instance you like but for any such illegal orders?
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
In that context, yes.
In the context you have given.
However, what those six Democrats that made that video did was first very strongly imply that this administration and Trump where issuing illegal orders. No, they didn't come right out and say that, but they all but said it.
Their message was clear: Trump and his administration are issuing illegal orders and you in the military don't have to obey them.
That is a whole different animal.
QP!
Verified User
No you are simply lying, as always.
The statements made were a general caution in this exact same way and less of a direct comment than the one Hegseth made where he called Trump a paper tiger for saying the military would follow his illegal orders.
What you do not get to do is 'read between the lines' and pick out YOUR OWN context for what they said and attribute it to them. They either said a thing or they did not.
That you are saying is 'my read is they replied' as a reason to say something is wrong or punishable is so absurd it is stupid.
Can i tell you what you just implied? Is my opinion of your implication something you should be punished for?
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Hypocrisy is a vital part of being a MAGAt cracker retard.
Whiskey Pete is refusing to release the video tape of the Double-Tap strike because he knows it's proof of a war crime. He's too fucking stupid to realize that as soon as he's out of office, that video will see him in court. His best way out is a bottle of booze and a .45.
QP!
Verified User
@T. A. Gardner proves what an empty shill she is by saying even though they all said the same words, what Pete and Bondi said is ok because she reads a different intent behind what the Dem's meant and the Dems need to be punished for that intent she assumes.Hypocrisy is a vital part of being a MAGAt cracker retard.
Whiskey Pete is refusing to release the video tape of the Double-Tap strike because he knows it's proof of a war crime. He's too fucking stupid to realize that as soon as he's out of office, that video will see him in court. His best way out is a bottle of booze and a .45.
She ignores no one is responsible for what others 'assume they mean' as opposed to what they actually said and she also ignores Pete Hegseth's comments were SPECIFICALLY about Trump giving illegal orders to the military. NO assumption needed as Hegseth speaking to a potential Trump future Presidency says over and over after Trump says 'his military will follow his illegal orders' that they 'will not follow the unlawful orders from the Commander in Chief' as he continues to call Trump a Paper Tiger who never served.