Am I correct, the Trumper’s now quietly admit

You're either blind or stupid. You're a retard
And YOU don't know how to read,
Here it is AGAIN .

Article II, Section 1, Clause 2

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.
 
Here STUPID read what the Constitution says.

Clause 2. Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress; but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.
Article I, Section 4, Clause 1:

The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.
 
There was no evidence in the search warrant affidavit other than quoted debunked prior CT stuff and the DoJ relied on judges giving them the benefit of the doubt (presumption or regularity) when they present information saying this is sufficient to establish the elements of a potential crime. Judges across the country are learning that with this Trump DoJ, they can no longer simply trust them as they are caught lying consistently so it is changing slowly but they still are getting away, initially, with some crap.

So get your excuse ready and your next talking point out, for when that search warrant is invalidated.

FBI election probe lacks 'faintest possibility of probable cause,' Fulton County says in court filing

The FBI’s Fulton County Raid Was Based on Debunked Claims By Election Deniers

You're simply regurgitating the issued talking points. Like I said before, do I believe a judge, or some rando piece of shit on JPP? Not a difficult choice.
 
Article I, Section 4, Clause 1:

The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.
Do you have a link for this?
but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.
 
You're simply regurgitating the issued talking points. Like I said before, do I believe a judge, or some rando piece of shit on JPP? Not a difficult choice.

When it is over ruled we will see if you suddenly stop 'believing the judge' and instead claim activist judges.

Did you believe all the judges who ruled 100% against all the election interference cases that the Trump team put before them and that got adjudicated? Or was your 'faith' in judges suddenly gone then?
 
Who was in charge at the time of the investigation.
Trump. Just say no to drugs, sweet cheeks. You'll live longer and be less likely to go to prison. :thup:

By saying his former boss knew he had lost the election, Mr Barr is undermining another plank of Mr Trump's defence which is that he was not defrauding the American people because he always believed he had won.

He added that the former president's alleged actions, as outlined in the indictment, are "nauseating" and "despicable".
In this latest indictment, Mr Trump faces four counts, including conspiracy to defraud the US, obstructing an official proceeding and conspiracy against the rights of citizens to have their votes counted.

He has already been charged in two other cases: with mishandling classified files and falsifying business records to cover up a hush-money payment to a porn star.


On the eve of the arraignment, Mr Trump slammed the case as proof of the "corruption, scandal, and failure" of the US under Joe Biden's presidency.

Time until a meth-head MAGAt says Bill Barr is a Lefty: 10...9...8...
 
You're simply regurgitating the issued talking points. Like I said before, do I believe a judge, or some rando piece of shit on JPP? Not a difficult choice.
Derpity derp dire
Legina's a liar

Only a true idiot and/or nutjobs regurgitates the 2020 election fraud conspiracy theory.

Sic Semper Tyrannis
 
Trump. Just say no to drugs, sweet cheeks. You'll live longer and be less likely to go to prison. :thup:

By saying his former boss knew he had lost the election, Mr Barr is undermining another plank of Mr Trump's defence which is that he was not defrauding the American people because he always believed he had won.

He added that the former president's alleged actions, as outlined in the indictment, are "nauseating" and "despicable".
In this latest indictment, Mr Trump faces four counts, including conspiracy to defraud the US, obstructing an official proceeding and conspiracy against the rights of citizens to have their votes counted.

He has already been charged in two other cases: with mishandling classified files and falsifying business records to cover up a hush-money payment to a porn star.


On the eve of the arraignment, Mr Trump slammed the case as proof of the "corruption, scandal, and failure" of the US under Joe Biden's presidency.

Time until a meth-head MAGAt says Bill Barr is a Lefty: 10...9...8...
Bill Barr could not have possibly investigated the election in the swing states. There was not enough time. Just say no to meth and get those nasty meth teeth fixed.
 
Bill Barr could not have possibly investigated the election in the swing states. There was not enough time. Just say no to meth and get those nasty meth teeth fixed.
Fake Ignore is the best!
I took you off ignore and you couldn't even make it a week.
I took you off ignore to see if the quality of your posts improve
I only recently took you off ignore hell.
ajo4m7.gif
 
When did the US Congress alter the 2020 election? Did the US Congress give the right to a state lower court to change PRESIDENTIAL voting laws?
ROFLMAO. I guess you missed this part of the US Constitution

Section 4: Elections​


The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.


Before you make a stupid comment, Presidential elections are held at the same time as other elections so the state sets the rules in the state. (Unless Congress passed a law altering the state rules.)
 
Am I correct now that the Trumper‘s quietly admit that Biden legitimately beat Trump?

ROFl

All the exposed fraud in Georgia making you nervous, Fake Lawyer?

If not, how come nobody can come up with any evidence of Significant voter fraud?

Yep, you are freaking out about the massive fraud in Fulton County being exposed.

The Fulton County vote was as much of a fraud as you, yourself are - fake lawyer.
 
ROFLMAO. I guess you missed this part of the US Constitution

Section 4: Elections​


The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.


Before you make a stupid comment, Presidential elections are held at the same time as other elections so the state sets the rules in the state. (Unless Congress passed a law altering the state rules.)
Meth-heads and MAGA morons only see what they want to see. Weird, but it's a clue to their demented, deluded and/or drugged mental state.
 
Back
Top