American Complacency And Government Corruption

Hello Dutch Uncle,



Good clarification. I should have said 'capitalism as we use it.'

Because of legalized government corruption, we do not have proper regulation of our capitalism. This threatens our very nation because it contributes to a dangerous rise in extreme wealth inequality and a general resentment in those who are disadvantaged by our system. Worse, the greedy and powerful manipulate the media to keep people hating the government. They use the government as the scape-goat for the way they extract our wealth.

All of which takes us back to two previous topics: the importance of both voting and critical thinking to get our nation back on the correct path.
 
There is no greater unused power than that of the American voting public.

We could have so much if only we could get people to understand the untapped potential.

Agree!

Here is what has happened though, at least in my opinion. People still vote. The younger people and the middle-aged ppl have the most votes of all. How is that possible? Because they vote with their wallets. America is no longer a democratic republic. The people with the most power are the plutocrats, and their base are the people who have the most spending power.
 
We need public financing of elections with no outside money at all. We need much shorter elections. Three months seems right. Will Rogers says we have the best politicians that money can buy. Money in politics is not a joke. It has to be stopped for the people to have power.

I agree with this 100%.
 
We need public financing of elections with no outside money at all. We need much shorter elections. Three months seems right. Will Rogers says we have the best politicians that money can buy. Money in politics is not a joke. It has to be stopped for the people to have power.
Will Rogers also said he didn't belong to an organized political party....he was a Democrat. :)
 
Because of legalized government corruption, we do not have proper regulation of our capitalism. This threatens our very nation because it contributes to a dangerous rise in extreme wealth inequality and a general resentment in those who are disadvantaged by our system. Worse, the greedy and powerful manipulate the media to keep people hating the government. They use the government as the scape-goat for the way they extract our wealth.

Well said.

History has shown us that the best economic system in human existence, so far, is well-fettered capitalism. You don't want to stifle it completely (communism), or severely (socialism) -- but you don't want it to run free either (laizze-faire) or -- as you said -- you end up like we are currently, with a huge "underclass" and a tiny 1% holding most of the wealth.

A large segment of our citizenry has been convinced that taxes are bad, our (horribly high) taxes go to support lazy urban slackers, illegals are living off our taxes, taxes stifle business and job creation, and so on.

Why is that, and who would want them to believe that this is true?
 
Hello ThatOwlWoman,

Well said.

History has shown us that the best economic system in human existence, so far, is well-fettered capitalism. You don't want to stifle it completely (communism), or severely (socialism) -- but you don't want it to run free either (laizze-faire) or -- as you said -- you end up like we are currently, with a huge "underclass" and a tiny 1% holding most of the wealth.

A large segment of our citizenry has been convinced that taxes are bad, our (horribly high) taxes go to support lazy urban slackers, illegals are living off our taxes, taxes stifle business and job creation, and so on.

Why is that, and who would want them to believe that this is true?

If the oligarchy doesn't create scape-goats the populace will focus attention on THEM.
 
All of which takes us back to two previous topics: the importance of both voting and critical thinking to get our nation back on the correct path.

I love the topic of critical thinking. It's vital to an informed person's daily life, as well as to her public life and all the decisions she will make. I'd like to offer my definition of that cherished concept, and hope to hear yours.

Critical thinking: The ability to discern whether what is on your plate is manure, or manna.

How does one learn critical thinking? Question authority. Always. Doesn't matter whether the authority is your mom and dad, a teacher at school, the info packet you get when you sign up for a new job, your drill sergeant, your spouse. Question it, even if you have to do it internally.

Your one-word mantra should be: WHY?
 
If the oligarchy doesn't create scape-goats the populace will focus attention on THEM.

Yep.

I'm not going to claim that I'm immune because I am not. I have my own life-long beliefs and values. I'd like to believe, though, that thanks to my "liberal" education, I am still capable of discerning when I'm being played.
 
I hate to sounds so cynical, but being cynical does not make you wrong. But when, I look at the general voting public, I see a bunch of chickens in a chicken coop, and so long as the feed keeps coming the chickens are content, and don't care about anything else, and they don't want to be bothered about anything else. But when the feed stops coming, the chickens all starts to squawk.

The point here, is that the voting public just doesn't understand the serious responsibility to be informed about the candidates, and to vote. Voter apathy, and voter ignorance is the greatest threat to our democracy.


:good4u: Well said!
 
I love the topic of critical thinking. It's vital to an informed person's daily life, as well as to her public life and all the decisions she will make. I'd like to offer my definition of that cherished concept, and hope to hear yours.

Critical thinking: The ability to discern whether what is on your plate is manure, or manna.

How does one learn critical thinking? Question authority. Always. Doesn't matter whether the authority is your mom and dad, a teacher at school, the info packet you get when you sign up for a new job, your drill sergeant, your spouse. Question it, even if you have to do it internally.

Your one-word mantra should be: WHY?

I like it. :)
 
Hello ThatOwlWoman,

If the oligarchy doesn't create scape-goats the populace will focus attention on THEM.

Scapegoating is an ancient means for TPTB to stay in power by distracting the masses. It's one reason to avoid populism and to be for a Republic over a pure Democracy.
 
I switched on DirecTvs "news mix" about 20 minutes ago. It defaults to CNN. Don Lemon was on and I can only take so much of him so I slid the sound over to Fox with Laura Ingraham. She's just as annoying but I overheard her make an interesting comment supporting populism. A RW talking head flip flopping to supporting giving into to the desires of Low-Information voters? WTF?! It wasn't that long ago they were against such a thing. The world really has gone topsy-turvy.
 
Hello Dutch Uncle,

I switched on DirecTvs "news mix" about 20 minutes ago. It defaults to CNN. Don Lemon was on and I can only take so much of him so I slid the sound over to Fox with Laura Ingraham. She's just as annoying but I overheard her make an interesting comment supporting populism. A RW talking head flip flopping to supporting giving into to the desires of Low-Information voters? WTF?! It wasn't that long ago they were against such a thing. The world really has gone topsy-turvy.

Not that the world was ever really all on the up and up.
 
I switched on DirecTvs "news mix" about 20 minutes ago. It defaults to CNN. Don Lemon was on and I can only take so much of him so I slid the sound over to Fox with Laura Ingraham. She's just as annoying but I overheard her make an interesting comment supporting populism. A RW talking head flip flopping to supporting giving into to the desires of Low-Information voters? WTF?! It wasn't that long ago they were against such a thing. The world really has gone topsy-turvy.

right, because selling out to china is such a great intellectual achievement.
 
Hello Dutch Uncle,

True, but up to the last 20 years, up was up and down was down, not all topsy-turvy head-over-tails.

Good way to put it.

We never had a president who appeals to extremists until now.

Presidents used to try to bring the nation together, not drive it apart.
 
Hello Dutch Uncle,



Good way to put it.

We never had a president who appeals to extremists until now.

Presidents used to try to bring the nation together, not drive it apart.

Agreed about Presidents and extremists. We, the People have been heading in that direction for over 25 years. Trump isn't a freak accident on the road of American politics; Trump is the logical progression of what both parties have been doing since 1992. Trump is an extreme swing in Pendulum Politics.....a swing, IMO, that is so far, it's inevitable to swing back the other way. Like pendulums (or bouncing golf balls), the extremes will slow down to find equilibrium.

If the extremes in American politics weren't bad enough, We, the People have suffered through economic downfalls, major terrorist attacks and a Federal government so dysfunctional that all they can agree upon is to increase the national debt: https://www.crfb.org/blogs/budget-projections-debt-will-exceed-size-economy-year

This author puts the national political situation more eloquently than I:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2018/11/07/a_way_out_of_pendulum_politics__138578.html
..P.utting a check on President Trump may be the only positive outcome of this election. Who believes that voters’ desire for change is satisfied by putting the speaker’s gavel back into the hands of (presumably) Nancy Pelosi? Who thinks dysfunction in D.C. will subside under divided government? How are we any closer to solutions on pressing problems?

While the pendulum swings, there is a growing group of Americans –– described in a recent study as the “Exhausted Majority” and estimated at 67 percent of the electorate –– who are tired of the political oscillation and are in search of a productive equilibrium.

This equilibrium is not a utopian absence of polarizing forces, but a balance between them. It’s not a mythical “middle ground” found by splitting the difference on any particular policy issue, but a higher ground found by using facts, reason, and common sense to address our biggest challenges...



COVID%20Deficit%20Projections_05282020.png
 
Agreed about Presidents and extremists. We, the People have been heading in that direction for over 25 years. Trump isn't a freak accident on the road of American politics; Trump is the logical progression of what both parties have been doing since 1992. Trump is an extreme swing in Pendulum Politics.....a swing, IMO, that is so far, it's inevitable to swing back the other way. Like pendulums (or bouncing golf balls), the extremes will slow down to find equilibrium.

If the extremes in American politics weren't bad enough, We, the People have suffered through economic downfalls, major terrorist attacks and a Federal government so dysfunctional that all they can agree upon is to increase the national debt: https://www.crfb.org/blogs/budget-projections-debt-will-exceed-size-economy-year

This author puts the national political situation more eloquently than I:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2018/11/07/a_way_out_of_pendulum_politics__138578.html
..P.utting a check on President Trump may be the only positive outcome of this election. Who believes that voters’ desire for change is satisfied by putting the speaker’s gavel back into the hands of (presumably) Nancy Pelosi? Who thinks dysfunction in D.C. will subside under divided government? How are we any closer to solutions on pressing problems?

While the pendulum swings, there is a growing group of Americans –– described in a recent study as the “Exhausted Majority” and estimated at 67 percent of the electorate –– who are tired of the political oscillation and are in search of a productive equilibrium.

This equilibrium is not a utopian absence of polarizing forces, but a balance between them. It’s not a mythical “middle ground” found by splitting the difference on any particular policy issue, but a higher ground found by using facts, reason, and common sense to address our biggest challenges...



COVID%20Deficit%20Projections_05282020.png

its not extremist to put ones own countrymen above the ccp.
 
Hello Dutch Uncle,

Agreed about Presidents and extremists. We, the People have been heading in that direction for over 25 years. Trump isn't a freak accident on the road of American politics; Trump is the logical progression of what both parties have been doing since 1992. Trump is an extreme swing in Pendulum Politics.....a swing, IMO, that is so far, it's inevitable to swing back the other way. Like pendulums (or bouncing golf balls), the extremes will slow down to find equilibrium.

If the extremes in American politics weren't bad enough, We, the People have suffered through economic downfalls, major terrorist attacks and a Federal government so dysfunctional that all they can agree upon is to increase the national debt: https://www.crfb.org/blogs/budget-projections-debt-will-exceed-size-economy-year

This author puts the national political situation more eloquently than I:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2018/11/07/a_way_out_of_pendulum_politics__138578.html
..P.utting a check on President Trump may be the only positive outcome of this election. Who believes that voters’ desire for change is satisfied by putting the speaker’s gavel back into the hands of (presumably) Nancy Pelosi? Who thinks dysfunction in D.C. will subside under divided government? How are we any closer to solutions on pressing problems?

While the pendulum swings, there is a growing group of Americans –– described in a recent study as the “Exhausted Majority” and estimated at 67 percent of the electorate –– who are tired of the political oscillation and are in search of a productive equilibrium.

This equilibrium is not a utopian absence of polarizing forces, but a balance between them. It’s not a mythical “middle ground” found by splitting the difference on any particular policy issue, but a higher ground found by using facts, reason, and common sense to address our biggest challenges...



COVID%20Deficit%20Projections_05282020.png

There have always been extremists in both parties, but the Democratic Party has never allowed the extremists to dominate their Party since FDR. Bernie came close in 2016, but the old guard of the party would not allow it. The Democratic Party has a built-in mechanism which acts to prevent an extremist take-over. The Super Delegate System. The Republican party does not have the same setup. There were no Super Delegates in the Republican Party to prevent the DT hostile takeover.

I didn't like it in 2016. I was a Bernie fan. I wanted him IN. And I think he could have beaten DT. Who knows what would have happened, because he would not have had the support of the House nor Senate. He probably would have been sort of a 4 year lame duck and not gotten reelected because he would not have been able to pass any of his proposals. and then the political pendulum would swing in 2020, handing another ten years of reapportioning to Republicans. Yikes!

So there's a silver lining for me if DT loses as big as the polling currently indicates. He is starting to drag down some down-ticket races for Republicans. Biden could have a fully supportive Congress if he wins in November, and the coat tails could reach all the way down to States and once-every-ten-years District reapportionment. About TIME...
 
Back
Top