She strikes me as another Religious Zealot.
Just the mere fact that Trump supporters are coming to her defense makes her suspect and unappealing.
No, you're saying Black Christians would vote for a Hare Krishna, ... and White Christians will not.
She strikes me as another Religious Zealot.
Just the mere fact that Trump supporters are coming to her defense makes her suspect and unappealing.
Iran deal too huh? Good for her -she def. belongs in another party"Yet the starry-eyed anointment of Gabbard has obscured the more unsavory aspects of her politics — so unsavory, in fact, that White House adviser Steve Bannon has reportedly spoken well of her. From her vigorous opposition to the Iran nuclear deal to her obsession with “radical Islam” to her love for the far-right Indian leader Narendra Modi, Gabbard is far from the progressive hero many assume her to be."
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/05/tulsi-gabbard-president-sanders-democratic-party
I never said that. I'm sure plenty of white Christians would vote for a Hare Krishna, but the super right-wing religious Christians would not.
..Hillary Clinton said that Rep. Tulsi Gabbard is being groomed by Moscow to run as a third-party spoiler candidate in 2020 to help President Trump win reelection.
The former secretary of state pushed the theory on Campaign HQ podcast hosted by David Plouffe, President Barack Obama’s campaign manager in 2008.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ian-asset-groomed-to-ensure-trump-re-election
_______________
Except Hillary is smarter than that.
She’s sabotaging Gabbard in the event she does go independent—and Gabbard may, since the DNC/media consortium is pissing her off.
But Hillary floated that laughable theory for the benefit of gullible lefties who will swallow any theory with the words ‘Trump’ and ‘Russian’ in it.
And Hillary knows that as well as anyone.
"Yet the starry-eyed anointment of Gabbard has obscured the more unsavory aspects of her politics — so unsavory, in fact, that White House adviser Steve Bannon has reportedly spoken well of her. From her vigorous opposition to the Iran nuclear deal to her obsession with “radical Islam” to her love for the far-right Indian leader Narendra Modi, Gabbard is far from the progressive hero many assume her to be."
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/05/tulsi-gabbard-president-sanders-democratic-party
She is supposed to be doing a live interview about now. It's past 6:30.
Gabbard herself supples much fodder for the opinions that swirl around her.
She is not a Progressive.
Tulsi Gabbard: The Bernie-Endorsing Congresswoman Who Trump Fans Can Love
https://www.thedailybeast.com/tulsi...dorsing-congresswoman-who-trump-fans-can-love
lol, like hillary & hubby never coddled a tyrant, dictator & out right butcher before..![]()
Just the mere fact that Trump supporters are coming to her defense makes her suspect and unappealing.
she was just on Tucker.Sorry no, Bill. I'm sure it will make the news if she does do it.
basing your opinion on what ppl you don't know & for the most part despise, rather than doing your own research, your own fact check & coming to your own conclusions based on it.....
![]()
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, the congresswoman who resigned from a top Democratic Party post after protesting a lack of debates between Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton, is now refusing to debate her own Democratic opponent.
Arguing for more debates between Sanders and Hillary last October, Gabbard told MSNBC, “We’ve gotta have more opportunities for people to present their vision for our country, their plans, and to be held accountable for the positions that they’re taking.” After months of dissent over the Democratic debate schedule, Gabbard stepped down from her position as a Democratic National Committee vice chairwoman to endorse Sanders.
But now that Gabbard is being challenged by progressive activist Shay Chan Hodges, she is refusing to even respond to a request for debates.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2016/06/28/tulsi-gabbard-dodges-debate