shh... don't discourage them.Why is a non-progressive Democrat such a bad thing lol?
There were more than a few notable ones in the past.
Run Warren or Bernie and watch the Democrats lose big time in 2020
shh... don't discourage them.Why is a non-progressive Democrat such a bad thing lol?
There were more than a few notable ones in the past.
shh... don't discourage them.
Run Warren or Bernie and watch the Democrats lose big time in 2020
Right now Warren is ahead of Biden......... trump Inc went through all that trouble & he may not even get the nom.![]()
And yet, you contend that super religious Black Christians will vote for a Hare Krishna.
Tight wingers believe in freedom of religious, Leftwingers believe in abolishing religion.
You really think Trump is threatened by Romney or whoever lol?
shh... don't discourage them.
Run Warren or Bernie and watch the Democrats lose big time in 2020
Most Americans Are Liberal, Even If They Don’t Know It
Don’t believe it? Check out these polls.
https://prospect.org/power/americans-liberal-even-know/
This is actually more about ethnicity than religion. In India, the Hindus are seen as an ethno-religious group, kind of like the Jews or Coptic Christians.
Maybe Gabbard is a religious zealot, I don't know what's in he heart, but her policies don't seem to be based in religion.
She is supposed to be doing a live interview about now. It's past 6:30.
No, I said that super right-wing religious Christians won't vote for a Hare Krishna. You decided to make it about race. Why is the Right so obsessed with "identity politics," anyway?
Right-wingers believe in freedom of religion for Christians and Jews. They have double standards for other religions, especially Islam.
And I wish you were right about left-wingers. We should abolish religion, but the truth is most Leftists believe in a religion too.
So you're not talking about whitey when you use the political phrase "super right-wing religious Christians"? Bullshit.
And Black Christians have never elected a Hindu. You just pulled that out of your ass.
If you want to make everything about race, that's your business.
I never said they did.
This was outstanding:
""Great! Thank you @HillaryClinton. You, the queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, and personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long, have finally come out from behind the curtain," Gabbard ranted at her fellow Democrat.
Gabbard, 38, accused 71-year-old Clinton, long a doyenne of the Washington establishment, of leading a "concerted campaign" to destroy her reputation.
"Now we know -- it was always you, through your proxies and powerful allies in the corporate media and war machine, afraid of the threat I pose," she added.
"It's now clear that this primary is between you and me," she sneered. "Don't cowardly hide behind your proxies. Join the race directly."
why do right wingers come to the defense of Tulsi?
Hillary needs some serious psychiatric attention for her paranoia and OCD for
seeing Russians everywhere. Jill Stein, Tulsi Gabbard, Trump. I'm not being
facetious here. She was having serious medical issues while she was campaigning
and I think she's been placed on few medications and her mind is shot from some
unintended side effects. Her "poor me" routine is old and stale.
Gabbard is smart, poised, patriotic, poised, non-drama queen...and did I say POISED?
I believe nothing and no one will beat Trump. I do have my own way of hoping how
opposing candidates do. I always pull for the one that would win just in case MY
candidate loses. In other words, if I have to lose at least let it be to someone I don't
think would be a complete disaster for our country. This time around it's Gabbard.
I'm realistic though. The Dems and media want nothing to do with her.