Another appalling distraction from the issues

None of the JPP Righties will act - they never do.

But some other gun nut might act on their Don's suggestion.

If that happens they will rejoice.
 
Mr.Badguy said:
I'm pretty sure that's just Trump projectile vomiting shit against the wall. If you can't bring yourself to blame him for the things he says, then you just might have a taste for shit.
Click to expand...

Not sure what you mean by "blame". He says what he says. Because I don't interpret the same as you desperate lefties is your problem
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Why should the press "help out" when the message Trump is sending out is for gun nuts to assassinate Hillary if she's elected?

Shouldn't that type of outlandish hyperbole be exposed?
Click to expand...
1.that characterization is ridiculous. without defending it -it's bad Trump style speech. The press is actually talking assassination.
More generally to the servile press for Clinton, and the "gotcha"press for Trump.
 
Trump supporters shouldn't complain about this stuff.

It's what you bought when you made him the nominee. There was no mystery about this. It's how he got hundreds of millions of dollars worth of free press coverage to begin with.

This is who he is. It's what he has given us so far, and it's what he'll give us the remainder of the campaign. If elected, it's what we'll get for 4 years.
 
Thing1 said:
Trump supporters shouldn't complain about this stuff.

It's what you bought when you made him the nominee. There was no mystery about this. It's how he got hundreds of millions of dollars worth of free press coverage to begin with.

This is who he is. It's what he has given us so far, and it's what he'll give us the remainder of the campaign. If elected, it's what we'll get for 4 years.
Click to expand...
Clinton doesn't get free press?
The difference is Clinton's ...screw up's get buried
( see if you can find anything on WaPo about today's Clinton Foundation pay for play-I just looked. not there.

Then see how many stories there are about the Clinton "2nd amendment assassination".

The press is servile to Clinton.
 
anatta said:
Clinton doesn't get free press?
The difference is Clinton's ...screw up's get buried
( see if you can find anything on WaPo about today's Clinton Foundation pay for play-I just looked. not there.

Then see how many stories there are about the Clinton "2nd amendment assassination".

The press is servile to Clinton.
Click to expand...

That's complete bull. The email story has been covered exhaustively for a year - and there wasn't even anything there besides a basic reprimand.

Trump gets coverage because he's the perfect personality for the media age. His supporters loved it when it put him over the top of the other GOP nominees, none of whom could get even the smallest fraction of his air time.

Sorry, but that's the way it is. The press hasn't given Hillary a free pass. Trump just sells more papers.
 
Teflon Don said:
Not sure what you mean by "blame". He says what he says. Because I don't interpret the same as you desperate lefties is your problem
Click to expand...

I just don't see, given Trumps history, how it could be taken any other way. To assume he meant through legal lobbying etc, is to assume that he's suddenly become less of an imbecile when it comes to how the government works.

He certainly could have worded it MUCH better if that's actually what he meant. Personally, just as ridiculous as it may seem to you that he suggested a shooting, it is as equally ridiculous to me that he meant something innocuous. We could both be wrong, that's the bad thing about his vague wording.
 
Mr.Badguy said:
I just don't see, given Trumps history, how it could be taken any other way. To assume he meant through legal lobbying etc, is to assume that he's suddenly become less of an imbecile when it comes to how the government works.

He certainly could have worded it MUCH better if that's actually what he meant. Personally, just as ridiculous as it may seem to you that he suggested a shooting, it is as equally ridiculous to me that he meant something innocuous. We could both be wrong, that's the bad thing about his vague wording.
Click to expand...

If a gun nut acts on the Don's clearly-expressed wish, JPP righties will be delighted.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Why should the press "help out" when the message Trump is sending out is for gun nuts to assassinate Hillary if she's elected?

Shouldn't that type of outlandish hyperbole be exposed?
Click to expand...
The "outlandish hyperbole" is from the 'rats, and their adoring press.
 
Thing1 said:
That's complete bull. The email story has been covered exhaustively for a year - and there wasn't even anything there besides a basic reprimand.

Trump gets coverage because he's the perfect personality for the media age. His supporters loved it when it put him over the top of the other GOP nominees, none of whom could get even the smallest fraction of his air time.

Sorry, but that's the way it is. The press hasn't given Hillary a free pass. Trump just sells more papers.
Click to expand...
I'm talking about todays' breaking email on the Clinton Foundation "pay for play".... a basic reprimand? Did you read Comey's statement?
 
anatta said:
1.that characterization is ridiculous. without defending it -it's bad Trump style speech. The press is actually talking assassination.
More generally to the servile press for Clinton, and the "gotcha"press for Trump.
Click to expand...

The press is talking assassination because that is CLEARLY what Trump implied with his little sideways comment yesterday.
 
Thing1 said:
Part of the job of President is knowing the ramifications of the words you use.

No one wants America to be doing damage control for its leader every other day.
Click to expand...

But we do want someone who would stop destroying the people with bad globalist policies.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
The press is talking assassination because that is CLEARLY what Trump implied with his little sideways comment yesterday.
Click to expand...

How many times have you asked people to provide you with the exact words you said? I've seen you call people liars for saying your words "clearly implied" something when your express words could maybe be interpreted as something else. Like your claim about Marco Rubio betraying his "race" because of Trump's stance on Mexicans.

Fucking massive hypocrite.
 
Loyal Lapdoggy Hack Hussein said:
How can anyone say for certain precisely what he meant lol? Do they read chicken entrails?
Click to expand...

You know exactly what he wants, little lapdoggy.

You are too frightened to do as your master desires, but you will yip excitedly and wag your little Trump-tail in exultation if a gun nut does the dirty deed your Don called for.

Don't lie.
 
anatta said:
Clinton doesn't get free press?
The difference is Clinton's ...screw up's get buried
( see if you can find anything on WaPo about today's Clinton Foundation pay for play-I just looked. not there.

Then see how many stories there are about the Clinton "2nd amendment assassination".

The press is servile to Clinton.
Click to expand...

Are you saying that they are equivalently negative/stupid/ignorant=news worthy??

She has her screwUPs..

Lets see he personally insulted cruz, the bush's, carly, lil marco, the kahns, anyone that dares to not agree etc etc etc..

Ugly Carly, Megyn's blood, trumpf Uninversity, rapist Mexicans, Muslims hate, Russian hacks, NRA hits, the list is endless & usually TRI-WEEKLY.. THE MF is negative industry to his own campaign..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top