Another baffling story behind the Left's ongoing love affair with radical Islam

Its obvious the left loves Islam and Islamism, because they believe in much of the same thing.

State control, and anti-west, anti-freedom ideology. The left believes America and the West ARE the problem. They believe the goverments need to be replaced with radical maxist/communist style governments, where everyone is "equal" and where everything is politically correct.

IE an Orwellian hell.

To accomplish their faux Utopia, they will use their Islamic Terrorist allies. This is the real reason Obama refuses to say Islamic Terrorism.

He loves Islam, and Sharia law. Believes its good practice.
 
Isn't that kind of stupid though?

Like it's some big secret that Mateen made the ISIS 9/11 call. And ISIS has already used it in their propaganda---if it's even propaganda. And how is that supposed to work, anyway? Like 'well crap, we can't claim Mateen as a jihadist because Lynch had any reference to ISIS deleted from the 9/11 transcript'. It's ridiculous.

He made his allegiance to ISIS then killed 50 Americans, how is Mateen NOT a jihadist? They supposed to carry cards in their wallet, or what?

The propaganda is that Mateen wasn't a radical Islamist.

Its because Liberals DON'T have a plan for Islamic Terrorism. Their plan is to literally ignore the problem. Blame gun control. Call it something else, like workplace violence.

I agree with you here. Are future ISIS terrorists just about to join Isis, then hear Obama NOT say Islamic terrorist, then fall back. Are people in DC really this dumb?
 
The left's problem is taking cues from Obama.
Obama has a vested interest in apologizing for Iraq to the point he went on an apology tour when he was elected.

Obama thought Obama being Obama was transformative in itself.
Then he had to face Afghanistan and couldn't decide on a strategy of either continuing nation building , or simple Whack - a mole

Then the Arab Spring -they all thought this was another transformative epoch, when in truth it started over food riots.

Then the screw up on ISIS as "JV"..Obama hasn't got a clue except to turn it over to his successor.
In Syria he has the right policy, but only because Putin left him no other viable role

Hillary went along for the ride on most of this -except Libya where she took a lead role
They are a bunch of screw ups.
 
The left's problem is taking cues from Obama.
Obama has a vested interest in apologizing for Iraq to the point he went on an apology tour when he was elected.

Obama thought Obama being Obama was transformative in itself.
Then he had to face Afghanistan and couldn't decide on a strategy of either continuing nation building , or simple Whack - a mole

Then the Arab Spring -they all thought this was another transformative epoch, when in truth it started over food riots.

Then the screw up on ISIS as "JV"..Obama hasn't got a clue except to turn it over to his successor.
In Syria he has the right policy, but only because Putin left him no other viable role

Hillary went along for the ride on most of this -except Libya where she took a lead role
They are a bunch of screw ups.

Guess, I'll be sure not to vote for Obama this next election.
 
Guess, I'll be sure not to vote for Obama this next election.
cute but obtuse
Hillary went along for the ride on most of this -except Libya where she took a lead role
They are a bunch of screw ups.
curious as to what you would point to as a Sec of Defense success by Hillary. How about the Egypt sanctions? :rolleyes:
 
Know thy enemy. Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer.

You don't think it makes a difference to understand Iran?

Absolutely understand them. But start with their version of Islam since Iran is a theocracy. And by all means don't sanitize it. If you learn that aspect you'll know that they will lie to you because lies are permissble in Islam under some circumstances. You will also learn they are, for all intents and purposes, irrational. In other words, where mutually assured destruction worked with the communists in the USSR decades ago, not so much, with people who think raining destruction on the planet will bring their messiah.

I can't imagine Obama, Kerry or Hillary not being aware of this. Then again, maybe they aren't. My guess is they ignore it.
 
cute but obtuse
curious as to what you would point to as a Sec of Defense success by Hillary. How about the Egypt sanctions? :rolleyes:

I'm curious too.

Hillary has extensive foreign policy experience. So does Bush II lol!

Her supporters are counting on her technical knowledge to get her through the debates. It's about all she has. Granted, she'll probably sound well-versed compared to Trump but Trump will have ample opportunity to harp on her mistakes and miscalculations.

Should be interesting.
 
I'm curious too.

Hillary has extensive foreign policy experience. So does Bush II lol!

Her supporters are counting on her technical knowledge to get her through the debates. It's about all she has. Granted, she'll probably sound well-versed compared to Trump but Trump will have ample opportunity to harp on her mistakes and miscalculations.

Should be interesting.
Clinton has a resume' not a list of accomplishments
 
We don't have to. There are plenty of videos and quotes where Obama identifies HIMSELF as one.


No there are not. Your claim is a deliberated lie. Stick to your stool fetish . Excrement is your area of specialty.
 
No there are not. Your claim is a deliberated lie. Stick to your stool fetish . Excrement is your area of specialty.

Since you're an Obama puppet and he's a piece of shit, that means your have the fetish.

Because you choose to not view them doesn't mean they don't exist.

Let someone have attended a church one time in their life and that's all the likes of you needs to call them a Christian. Obama can say "my Muslim faith" and you claim that my statement is a lie.
 
What difference does it make? You idiots have been calling him a closet Muslim since he started his 1st campaign for Prez.

He's not a closet Muslim. It's known by many. That he refuses to openly admit it simply means he hasn't come out of that closet but the information about his has.
 
What difference does it make? You idiots have been calling him a closet Muslim since he started his 1st campaign for Prez.

Judging by how he has run cover for the muslimes I would say he is out of the closet.

It was great the way he threw Loretta Lynch under the bus yesterday. Just like he fucked over Susan Rice over the lame video story.
 
Judging by how he has run cover for the muslimes I would say he is out of the closet.

It was great the way he threw Loretta Lynch under the bus yesterday. Just like he fucked over Susan Rice over the lame video story.

The knowledge of what he is has come out of the closet. He's yet, personally, to do so and admit what the rest of us know has exited that space.
 
Back
Top