Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
you didn't say texas liar. you didn't name a single state.
first timers never have the license suspended after the hearing
first timers never have the license suspended after the hearing
you didn't say texas liar. you didn't name a single state.
first timers never have the license suspended after the hearing
ANOTHER attempt at diversion...BHY attempts to derail the discussion by bogging it down in piddling details.
Regardless of which state we are discussing...when convicted of DUI, you must prove you are responsible enough to drive by completing the required defensive driving/driver education courses and paying the proper fines.
no you don't, most 1st time DUI's are reduced to simply a fine. hence why DUI lawyers make a killing in california.
there is no diversion except your whining tempter tantrum
so, let's recap, shall we?
zappa never mentioned texas, despite LYING and claiming he did.
zappa is a whiny two faced hypocrite for changing my username, which he claims, makes one a petty douchebag.
i didn't ignore 007...you handled him just fine. but you're a whiny bitch and now everytime you do not counter a point, i will take it as you ignoring it. like that? no, oh no, you will cry about it you two faced schmuck.
1. already addressed your idiotic "responsible" gun owner claim
2. we now see zappa running away from his claim he said texas, after he realized that he LIED
3. LOL
Thing is, the thing you are refusing to consider is WHY she pulled the gun."ButtHurtYurt still trying to derail the discussion with this ridiculous "running away" claim...he's going to keep trying to bog down the discussion with his petty fixation on this one minute point that has no bearing on the thread at all...but then, diversion is what ButtHurtYurt is going for.
You addressed nothing...I proved she was considered "responsible" by those in charge of issuing permits for guns and you immediately attempted to derail the thread with your childish word parsing games.
Selective editing again!So, let's recap, shall we?
You were WRONG about DUI penalties...
You were WRONG about the woman at Chucky Cheese...
You've ignored 007's story of sticking his gun in some smoker's face for the high crime of blowing smoke in his kid's face, because to comment on it might force you to admit he's not a "responsible gun owner" any more than that coward at Chucky Cheese.
"ButtHurtYurt still trying to derail the discussion with this ridiculous "running away" claim...he's going to keep trying to bog down the discussion with his petty fixation on this one minute point that has no bearing on the thread at all...but then, diversion is what ButtHurtYurt is going for.
You addressed nothing...I proved she was considered "responsible" by those in charge of issuing permits for guns and you immediately attempted to derail the thread with your childish word parsing games.
1. already addressed your idiotic "responsible" gun owner claim
You addressed nothing...I proved she was considered "responsible" by those in charge of issuing permits for guns and you immediately attempted to derail the thread with your childish word parsing games.
Selective editing again!
That's obamacult!
It was far more than just blowing smoke in my kids face.
It was a determined and potentially harmfull act of harrasment bordering on violence.
I used the best tool available to prevent the dangerous criminal from continuing his assault on a one year old child.
Before you ask, yes, I was fully prepared to use the weapon to defend my child. The guy was crazy I didn't know what he was capable of.
sappyretard can't read
You are selectively editing again, perhaps you can't help it.LOL...only a gun nut would boast of putting his gun in someone's face for BLOWING SMOKE in theirs, and then in the same breath call the smoker the crazy one.
It is a textbook case of you overreacting and flying off the handle...haven't you wondered why not a one of the board conservatives/gun lovers have spoken up in your defense?
They won't condemn you because to do so would be tantamount to admitting I am right and that is something they will never admit, but not a one has stepped up to defend your actions...now why is that do you suppose?
at least you come running when called sappyretard
LOL
you really can't read, i addressed it, you just refuse to be honest as usual
You are selectively editing again, perhaps you can't help it.
It was not my face, it was my infant child's face, the guy was crazed following us aggressively blowing smoke, getting in our face, stepping in front of us to the point that in the minute or so that he initiated his sustained attack on my infant more than 8 onlookers had called 911 to report his insane and dangerous behaviour.
Like I said, you are lying.
That's obamacult.
No problemo!
You obviously can't answer the question...why else would you still be playing the evasion game.
So once again I was right!
And once again you just aren't man enough to admit how full of shit you really are.