Another scientist telling us we have no free will

A conversation is not a decision. Redefinition fallacy.

You aren't making a point.

You aren't making a point.

You said learn, liar.

You aren't making a point.

Of what?

Yes you do.

Yes.

Can't define 'hot', eh?

No, but there's a logical one. Too bad you deny both.

Paradox. Irrational. You cannot claim a thing exists and does not exist at the same time.

Sorry, but apparently you get your thoughts beamed into your head from the orbital mind control satellite.

There are no 'Wizard of Oz' circuits.

I decided not to. You decided to.

l
 
A conversation is not a decision. Redefinition fallacy.

You aren't making a point.

You aren't making a point.

You said learn, liar.

You aren't making a point.

Of what?

Yes you do.

Yes.

Can't define 'hot', eh?

No, but there's a logical one. Too bad you deny both.

Paradox. Irrational. You cannot claim a thing exists and does not exist at the same time.

Sorry, but apparently you get your thoughts beamed into your head from the orbital mind control satellite.

There are no 'Wizard of Oz' circuits.

I decided not to. You decided to.

Clearly you have no actual argument for your beliefs and bring nothing to the discussion, so I'm just going to reply to your claim that I'm a liar.

Here is my statement that you replied to. I mean, how dumb do you have to be to not double check before calling someone a liar?

"Originally Posted by ZenMode View Post
Conversely, you can't use your free will to understand something that you don't understand."
 
Back
Top