/MSG/
Uwaa OmO
No, they don't. Stalking/harassment is determined by a PATTERN of behavior. There is no state in the union (or territory in our posession) that defines either the way you do.I stated that the Zimmerman case and this one were similar because Zimmerman stalked Trayvon. You cleared it up that Florida law means it's necessary to harass multiple times to be considered stalking. I'm willing to admit my mistake in terminology even though the rest of the Country has a different definition.
No. It was not stalking, it was not harassment, it was not in any way, shape or form, a crime. Zimmerman was legally in the right 110%.But you never debated me that it wasn't harassment...The leading part of "stalking" but only if it happens "multiple times". You basically stated that it is harassment, but not stalking according to Florida Law. Tomato wins.
I'm going to give YOU the Liberty to give me the term that describes what Zimmerman did. I'll guess it will be "followed" but I will let you pick the term kid. Chose the term it takes to describe the actions that Zimmerman made. Then explain why........................THIS is where you coward and leave because you don't have that in you.
I don't know why Zimmerman followed Martin. There are a slew of possible reasons. However, none of those possible reasons are relevent. Zimmerman was doing nothing wrong. Martin attacked him based on this, which is against the law. And in the end he died for his stupidity.