AOC calls on the government to ban Tucker Carlson and other Fox hosts

Uncensored2008 said:
Well, now that's a blatant lie;

{"I believe that when it comes to broadcast television, like Fox News, these are subject to federal law, federal regulation in terms of what’s allowed on air and what isn't," Ocasio-Cortez replied. "When you look at what Tucker Carlson and some of these other folks on Fox do, it is very, very clearly incitement of violence — very clearly incitement of violence. And that is the line that we have to be willing to contend with."}


federal regulation in terms of what’s allowed on air and what isn't

federal regulation in terms of what’s allowed on air and what isn't

federal regulation in terms of what’s allowed on air and what isn't

Nazi democrats once again shitting on the 1st Amendment...

The war on civil rights by the fascist left rages on.
Click to expand...

You seem upset. It's best for you to shut the fuck up.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Chauvin was convicted of the federal crime of violating Floyd's civil rights. He received a sentence of 21 years for that crime.
That was in addition to the murder conviction for the state crimes.
Click to expand...

It was a police brutality case, marketed as a hate crime to incite violence.
 
Diesel said:
You're not smart enough to participate in this conversation. Go back to bed.
Click to expand...

Stupidfuck. Mutiple Fake News talking heads stood in front of deadly riots, assuring us they were "mostly peaceful protests" throughout the BLM/ANTIFA insurrection, while the Stalinocrats paid bail for violent offenders, including Kamala Dumbass's campaign.

If you are unaware of the facts, please return your head to its resting place, in your ass.
 
Flash said:
Does the TV yell back? If you have never rioted that probably tells us TV shows do not incite riots.


I am talking about the law (acts which can be prosecuted), not what Democrats or prison culture believes.
Click to expand...

A sample group of 1, ok.

So why do you believe the riots lasted for over 2 months or as long as they did?
 
Flash said:
Agreed, but that is a hard standard to meet. You must prove I would not have committed that violence except for your incitement. It must be immediate and include some element of passion.

If I tell you to attack the Capitol tomorrow and you do it, that is not incitement. By tomorrow your level of passion would have passed and my urgings today did not cause you to act tomorrow. And, you cannot prove your actions were due to my statements.
Click to expand...

That isn't the legal standard.
 
Flash said:
Yes, "imminent" is an important element. That leaves out anything you saw on television or what anybody said unless I do it immediately caused by your action. And, you have to prove I intended to cause that action.
Click to expand...

And for some inexplicable reason that most of us can guess anyway, you want to absolve the crime and delete most of my posts like they never were written.
 
Bigdog said:
A sample group of 1, ok.

So why do you believe the riots lasted for over 2 months or as long as they did?
Click to expand...

Have you ever heard of a TV being prosecuted for causing a riot?

Do you think they intended to incite a riot when they broadcast the riots on the news? If they didn't broadcast those stories some would be yelling the mainstream media is covering up riots all over the country.

You can't prosecute the news media for exercising their 1st amendment freedom of the press.
 
Diesel said:
And for some inexplicable reason that most of us can guess anyway, you want to absolve the crime and delete most of my posts like they never were written.
Click to expand...

That is silly. The "crime" was committed by those rioting. Prosecute them. I don't want to absolve anybody. I am merely pointing out the law involving inciting a riot is difficult to meet.

What is the "reason" most can guess? Too many want to make posts partisan when they are just citing facts. Everything is not partisan to most people.
 
Flash said:
Have you ever heard of a TV being prosecuted for causing a riot?

Do you think they intended to incite a riot when they broadcast the riots on the news? If they didn't broadcast those stories some would be yelling the mainstream media is covering up riots all over the country.

You can't prosecute the news media for exercising their 1st amendment freedom of the press.
Click to expand...

Freedom of the press protects them from being prosecuted for inciting violence, ok.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top