gonzojournals
Better than You
What negatives?
For me, it weakens the meaning of traditional marriage. I also beleive the non-traditional orientation is detrimental to the family. Since the traditional family is the backbone of society, it is a threat to society.What negatives?
For me, it weakens the meaning of traditional marriage. I also beleive the non-traditional orientation is detrimental to the family. Since the traditional family is the backbone of society, it is a threat to society.
Have you found that gay gene yet?
So by your theory, this would make comparable to a disease?
Traditional marraige has alwys been defined as between one man and one woman, for the purpose of procreation and lifetime nuturing.But how?
I do have a life.You still haven't answered how, Southern Man.
Traditional marraige has alwys been defined as between one man and one woman, for the purpose of procreation and lifetime nuturing.
Whose tradition?
Besides, how does a definition change undermine marriage? You have yet to explain how anything is actually bad.
Biblical. It goes back over 500 years.
I did explain it; you just don't want to understand it.
It is normal for people to like different things than I like. Again, why should I care if gays are "born that way"?This issue is directly related to gay's assertion of normal, healthy, etc., and their subsequent demand for equal rights. If homosexuality is a choice, or a sickness, the claim for equal status, for something like marriage, for example, flies out the window faster than a bee in summer.
We are not discussing love, but marriage.Well, considering that Western culture has its tradition rooted in Greek culture for thousands of years before Christianity and Biblical tradition, I was just confused. Because, as you may know, the Greeks considered homosexual love to be the purest of love, because it was not influenced by procreation but by actual genuine feeling.
Another piss-poor analogy
We keep handicapped people from doing what would harm society. For example, we don't let the blind drive cars.
Marriage is a priveledge, not a right, and if you are not qualified for it then a civilized society should not allow it.
Most Americans say that gay marriage will have a negative impact on traditional marriage; a smaller minority disagree. I am in the former, and you are in the latter.
How is same sex marriage like the blind driving cars?
You see people can die or have their property damged if blind people were driving.
If we allow same sex marriage NO ONE IS HARMED!
Its none of your damned business and does not other people harm.
Do you really think marriage is a privledge and not a right?
Its not enough to just say it will cause damage to limmit others rights. YOU have to prove the damage that would be caused to limmit peoples rights.
At a time in our history interacial marriages were viewed the same way. No one could prove any damage so it was changed.
PROVE THE DAMAGE!
You didn't win. You still seem to be unwilling to learn about the hormone system and the brain and keep ignorantly insisting on a "gay gene" as the only proof. You're retarded. It's not a insult, but an accuracy.
... You're retarded. .....
.... you fool ....Your old prejudice ways....hated interacial marraige ....loved slavery .....
I find myself agreeing with Desh...and I'm afraid.
In seriousness, though, Southern Man--- even if I were to concede that homosexuality is "wrong", that still doesn't mean that their rights should be stripped away.