I like blueberry Pi.
I like blueberry Pi.
I would say that question presents a false dichotomy. It was both.My sense is that the existence of Pi, e, Feigenbaum constant, golden ratio, et. al suggest that numbers are an abstract Platonic reality which exist independently of human consciousness.
I would say that question presents a false dichotomy. It was both.
Yes but keep in mind that in mathematics pi is an irrational number and an abstract concept but in the real world it’s also an easily observable emperical fact.I see what you are getting at. The debate seems to be whether these numbers exist independently of human consciousness, or if they are mathmatical derivations of our intellect
In a purely mathmatical sense, we will never actually know e or Pi because they are irrational numbers, and their precise value can never be known no matter how many decimal places we extend it
Yes but keep in mind that in mathematics pi is an irrational number and an abstract concept but in the real world it’s also an easily observable emperical fact.
My sense is that the existence of Pi, e, Feigenbaum constant, golden ratio, et. al suggest that numbers are an abstract Platonic reality which exist independently of human consciousness.
My sense is that the existence of Pi, e, Feigenbaum constant, golden ratio, et. al suggest that numbers are an abstract Platonic reality which exist independently of human consciousness.
Yet we still intuitively know it is an inherent property of a circle and put it to a vast number of practical uses.That's the interesting thing about Pi. We understand it as a Euclidean geometric construct. But the value of pi will always be a mystery, which we can only seek to approximate.
So I guess what I am saying is that we don't really know what Pi is, we don't know what e is, we don't know what the square root of two really is, beyond mere approximations. But they still exist, whether or not our consciousness has the ability to fully grasp them.
Yet we still intuitively know it is an inherent property of a circle and put it to a vast number of practical uses.
Yet we still intuitively know it is an inherent property of a circle and put it to a vast number of practical uses.
Humans riding a bicycle is another great example of that. There is no satisfactory scientific explanation as to how humans are able to ride a bicycle but with some trial and error we lntuitively learn how to do so with little to no understanding of how it works by Newtonian physics or biology.Like gravity. Gravity exists but it took people like Galileo to put it in human terms.