Are the COVID choices you're being offered ACTUALLY choices??

AProudLefty said:
I guess you have forgotten what you said. This one is one of your premises.
Click to expand...
I guess you are English illiterate.

AProudLefty said:
"1. Undergo an invasive medical procedure against your will."
Click to expand...
Nothing within my OP, including this bit, was about me personally. My OP is very clearly referencing all people within the States of America who are directly affected by the federal government mandates that the Biden Regime is attempting to implement atm. The fact that I am currently not one of those people is irrelevant.

AProudLefty said:
Here's another one: "The federal government has no constitutional authority to coerce people into getting vaccinations." That is not happening in America.
Click to expand...
They don't, and it IS currently happening in the States of America.
 
Into the Night said:
Non-sequitur fallacy. False equivalence fallacy.

False equivalence fallacy.
Click to expand...

Fallacy fallacy. The fallacy fallacy occurs when a poster, almost always Into the Night, in order to avoid addressing the topic and to try make themselves look more intelligent then they really are claim other posters are using fallacies without explaining how the poster created a fallacy.
 
Nordberg said:
here is an example. https://www.wxyz.com/news/coronavir...l-says-unvaccinated-patients-are-filling-beds It is reality, something you avoid. and this one https://www.npr.org/2021/07/16/1017...ering-hospitals-for-covid-19-are-unvaccinated
Click to expand...
TV is not reality. News services are not reality. Attempted proof by proxy.
Nordberg said:
Stubbornly stupid is what you are. You could learn the truth but you seek a way out of facts,
Click to expand...
Insult fallacy. Buzzword fallacies. Ignoring non-English portion.
Nordberg said:
no matter how obscure or fake. you are 2 hairs removed from a monkey
Click to expand...
Cliche fallacy.

Trolling. No argument presented.
 
AProudLefty said:
I guess you have forgotten what you said. This one is one of your premises.

"1. Undergo an invasive medical procedure against your will."

Here's another one: "The federal government has no constitutional authority to coerce people into getting vaccinations." That is not happening in America.
Click to expand...

Special pleading fallacy. Denial of history.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Fallacy fallacy. The fallacy fallacy occurs when a poster, almost always Into the Night, in order to avoid addressing the topic and to try make themselves look more intelligent then they really are claim other posters are using fallacies without explaining how the poster created a fallacy.
Click to expand...
Mockery. Denial of logic. Spamming.
 
gfm7175 said:
I guess you are English illiterate.


Nothing within my OP, including this bit, was about me personally. My OP is very clearly referencing all people within the States of America who are directly affected by the federal government mandates that the Biden Regime is attempting to implement atm. The fact that I am currently not one of those people is irrelevant.


They don't, and it IS currently happening in the States of America.
Click to expand...

You asked if those were choices:

1. Take the jab
2. Get tested
3. Get an exemption (religious or medical)

You claimed that they are not choices because in order to keep a job or get a job, you gotta follow the company's changing policies and rules. (as per your post #4)
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Fallacy fallacy. The fallacy fallacy occurs when a poster, almost always Into the Night, in order to avoid addressing the topic and to try make themselves look more intelligent then they really are claim other posters are using fallacies without explaining how the poster created a fallacy.
Click to expand...

Redefinition fallacy. Denial of logic. Mockery. Trolling. No argument presented.
 
AProudLefty said:
You asked if those were choices:

1. Take the jab
2. Get tested
3. Get an exemption (religious or medical)
Click to expand...
Correct.

AProudLefty said:
You claimed that they are not choices because in order to keep a job or get a job, you gotta follow the company's changing policies and rules. (as per your post #4)
Click to expand...
Not my reasoning as to why they aren't choices (see my OP for my reasoning). Not what my post #4 says (re-read my post #4 again in its entirety).
 
gfm7175 said:
Correct.


Not my reasoning as to why they aren't choices (see my OP for my reasoning). Not what my post #4 says (re-read my post #4 again in its entirety).
Click to expand...

In other words, you are saying that if a company's polices change, the employees have no choice but to follow them to keep their jobs?
 
Into the Night said:
Redefinition fallacy. Denial of logic. Mockery. Trolling. No argument presented.
Click to expand...

Inversion fallacy?


Or is it just another example of your continued use of -

Fallacy fallacy. The fallacy fallacy occurs when a poster, almost always Into the Night, in order to avoid addressing the topic and to try make themselves look more intelligent then they really are claim other posters are using fallacies without explaining how the poster created a fallacy.
 
AProudLefty said:
So yes? A company must cater to employees who refuse to follow new policies and rules because reasons, regardless of the safety of other employees? Is that your position?
Click to expand...
RQAA. Stop asking questions that have already been answered numerous times. Learn how to pay attention to a conversation.
 
Another point you have not considered. Wouldn't the government forcing the companies to accept employees because reasons be unconstitutional?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top