Are the COVID choices you're being offered ACTUALLY choices??

[gfm7175]

Then the choice

... is to go all out 1776 on evil tyrannical Satan lovers such as yourself.

is to quit the federal (and some state/local) government job,

The mandates are with regard to the private sector, dumbass.

and given that the overwhelming majority of those 100+ million people of whom your OP is about have decided to get vaccinated

... some have, while others haven't. And the ones who did so only did so under duress/coercion. That's not free will, DEMON.

it seems your question is mute if not inane from the jump

Learn English, DEMON.

 

[gfm7175]

I call that a false trichotomy and do none of the above.

Sounds like either the mandate doesn't currently apply to you or you are choosing civil disobedience (to not comply).

That's the path that I will be taking if mandates ever target me. I will not be coerced or forced into an invasive medical procedure.

 

[gfm7175]

It's nice to see you using the inversion fallacy just like your compatriot.

You really should find a better pair of socks to wear.

Continued trolling and now lame sock accusations

 

[gfm7175]

Getting a test for a disease is an invasive medical procedure?

Yes. Shoving a q-tip deep into one's nasal cavities IS invasive, dude... by definition.

Does that mean that blowing your nose is an invasive medical procedure? Spitting is an invasive medical procedure?

No, and no.

I do have to question the what you consider "invasive".

Any procedure that involves entry into the body or its cavities.

If getting a Covid test is invasive

It is.

then having to submit to a drug test would also be invasive under you definition. Having your hearing checked would also be invasive it seems. (Hearing tests are required for employees when working under certain conditions.)

Both are invasive.

 

[gfm7175]

Thanks, Into the Night for that wonderful comment. As usual it is completely meaningless and doesn't provide any support to show what your silly acronym RQAA even means.

I am not Into The Night. You've been told numerous times what RQAA means. Are you incapable of learning? Are you only capable of parroting what you've been programmed?

Under your argument all OSHA rules would be unconstitutional. OSHA requires respirators. OSHA requires hard hats. OSHA requires safety shoes. OSHA requires drug testing. OSHA requires safety training. OSHA requires reporting of accidents. OSHA requires safety harnesses for high work. OSHA requires ongoing hearing tests for employees that work in loud environments. OSHA requires many things that companies have to add to their policies. Either they must all be unconstitutional or your attempt to claim requiring testing is unconstitutional is suspect and not supported by any real evidence..

OSHA is unconstitutional.

Gosh, Into the Night, another example of you claiming something without any support or evidence. How are they a paradox in your clouded mind? Simply claiming something is a paradox doesn't make it so. In fact your failure to provide evidence would indicate you are simply attempting to avoid addressing the issues raised. Something Into the Night does constantly. You seem to be an Into the Night sycophant.

Lame sock accusations. Do you not know what a paradox is? Can you not figure it out from the context of which I used the word? Again, are you incapable of learning?

 

[Into the Night]

So yes? A company must cater to employees who refuse to follow new policies and rules because reasons, regardless of the safety of other employees? Is that your position?

RQAA. Stop asking this question over and over. It's already been answered.

 

[Into the Night]

Inversion fallacy?


Or is it just another example of your continued use of -

Fallacy fallacy. The fallacy fallacy occurs when a poster, almost always Into the Night, in order to avoid addressing the topic and to try make themselves look more intelligent then they really are claim other posters are using fallacies without explaining how the poster created a fallacy.

RQAA. Redefinition fallacy. Denial of logic. Trolling. Spamming. No argument presented.

 

[Into the Night]

Another point you have not considered. Wouldn't the government forcing the companies to accept employees because reasons be unconstitutional?

RQAA. This question has also been answered. Stop asking it over and over.

 

[Into the Night]

How so?

Let's assume this person works for a company.

1. The person works for this company.
2. The company adds a new policy or a rule.
3. Everyone agrees.
4. This person disagrees.
5. It is against this person's will.

RQAA. Stop asking this question over and over. It's already been answered.

 

[Into the Night]

So OSHA is unconstitutional?

RQAA. Stop asking this question over and over. It's been answered already.

You forgot your own point? You were asking if it was a choice.

Contextomy fallacy. Attempt to void. RQAA. Trolling. No argument presented.

 

[Matt Dillon]

Sounds like either the mandate doesn't currently apply to you or you are choosing civil disobedience (to not comply).

That's the path that I will be taking if mandates ever target me. I will not be coerced or forced into an invasive medical procedure.

None of 'em make my world go 'round in ary a way. Fuck 'em!

 

[Into the Night]

Then the choice is to quit the federal (and some state/local) government job, and given that the overwhelming majority of those 100+ million people of whom your OP is about have decided to get vaccinated it seems your question is mute if not inane from the jump

Apparently you haven't heard about the general strike.

 

[Into the Night]

correct me if i'm wrong, but aren't vaccinated people spreading covid??????

Yes.

 

[Into the Night]

It's nice to see you using the inversion fallacy just like your compatriot.

You really should find a better pair of socks to wear.

YALSA. Fallacy fallacy. Trolling. No argument presented.

 

[Into the Night]

Getting a test for a disease is an invasive medical procedure?

Yes.

Does that mean that blowing your nose is an invasive medical procedure? Spitting is an invasive medical procedure?

Not a medical procedure. Redefinition fallacies.

I do have to question the what you consider "invasive". If getting a Covid test is invasive then having to submit to a drug test would also be invasive under you definition.

Yes.

Having your hearing checked would also be invasive it seems. (Hearing tests are required for employees when working under certain conditions.)

Not a medical procedure. Redefinition fallacy.

 

[Concart]

So if you are given two alternatives and allowed to pick one, that's called a choice you fucking moron.

 

[Concart]

Yes, but think about it, if you are vaccinated, you are less likely to get Covid, and if you are less likely to get Covid doesn't that mean you are also less likely to spread a virus you do not have?

That implies he has the ability to think. He does not.

 

[Into the Night]

Thanks, Into the Night for that wonderful comment. As usual it is completely meaningless and doesn't provide any support to show what your silly acronym RQAA even means.

RQAA. I have already described this to you. Stop asking the question.

Under your argument all OSHA rules would be unconstitutional. OSHA requires respirators. OSHA requires hard hats. OSHA requires safety shoes. OSHA requires drug testing. OSHA requires safety training. OSHA requires reporting of accidents. OSHA requires safety harnesses for high work. OSHA requires ongoing hearing tests for employees that work in loud environments. OSHA requires many things that companies have to add to their policies. Either they must all be unconstitutional or your attempt to claim requiring testing is unconstitutional is suspect and not supported by any real evidence..

No evidence needed. The Constitution is the ONLY authoritative reference of the Constitution. OHSA is unconstitutional. Yes. That includes all the rules that OHSA produces.

Gosh, Into the Night, another example of you claiming something without any support or evidence. How are they a paradox in your clouded mind?

I did not make this statement. Ask gfm. He made the statement. I assume he located a paradox of yours and called you on it. He's actually pretty good about that.

Simply claiming something is a paradox doesn't make it so.

You cannot resolve a paradox by denying it dude. You cannot wish it away either.

In fact your failure to provide evidence would indicate you are simply attempting to avoid addressing the issues raised.

No evidence needed. See the Constitution of the United States, which you discard.

Something Into the Night does constantly. You seem to be an Into the Night sycophant.

YALSA.

Trolling. No argument presented.

 

[Into the Night]

Yes, but think about it, if you are vaccinated, you are less likely to get Covid, and if you are less likely to get Covid doesn't that mean you are also less likely to spread a virus you do not have?

You cannot spread a virus you do not have.
Paradox V.

 

[Into the Night]

Sounds like either the mandate doesn't currently apply to you or you are choosing civil disobedience (to not comply).

That's the path that I will be taking if mandates ever target me. I will not be coerced or forced into an invasive medical procedure.

Neither will I.

I do no business with anyone requiring masks or vaccination proof. I do not wear a mask anywhere. I am not infected. I cannot spread covid19. I do not fear this virus.