Are the existence of matter and energy life's ONLY mysteries?

[Sammy Jankis]

Physics is natural philosophy, always has been, always will be.


No. it isn't, it isn't dependent on circular reasoning; empiricism as a philosophy is by definition required to be repeatable; the universe itself isn't. That's why they use the term 'theories', to emphasize the limits of language.

the rest of your rambling is just bad sophistry.

so tell us more about terrorist babies, Mr. smart.

 

[Hume]

so tell us more about terrorist babies, Mr. smart.

Where did the post mention "terrorist babies?"

 

[EdwinA]

so tell us more about terrorist babies, Mr. smart.

Ah, I have another mentally ill stalker now; I know I'm doing a good job when these sociopaths start crying everywhere.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

Ah, I have another mentally ill stalker now; I know I'm doing a good job when these sociopaths start crying everywhere.

I'm not your stalker, bitch.

you huff my fumes, second place.

 

[EdwinA]

I'm not your stalker, bitch.

you huff my fumes, second place.

lol lying doesn't help your affliction, tard.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

lol lying doesn't help your affliction, tard.

ok, Cheney democrat.

 

[EdwinA]

ok, Cheney democrat.

You haven't changed your name in over a week. Running out of personalities?

 

[Cypress]

Physics is a philosophy. Mathematics is a language. There are no 'mathematical laws'. Math is descriptive, and therefore limited by its definitions to circular reasoning. Physics isn't. Don't confuse the two. Physics isn't required to conform to mathematical definitions. Math can only be used to find patterns. And, it can't find all of them without determining some new repeatable definitions, which will be defined by the physics, not mathematics itself.

It's definitely a philosophical question.

The universal law of gravitation existed billions of years before humans discovered it. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, and the Higgs field seem to have an existence independent of motion and matter. The electroweak and strong fundamental forces seem to have been unified into a grand unified force fractions of a second before matter like quarks and protons existed; they didn't depend on matter.

Even Isaac Newton believed this theory did not believe his theory actually explained what gravity really is, only how gravity works in terms of motion and energy.

The prominent modern physicist Alexander Valenkin states that the mathematical laws of physics seem to exist in a platonic realm, independent of motion and matter.

Everything I have read and heard convinces me that math is discovered not invented, and that it is an immaterial reality onto itself independent of physical matter and energy.

 

[Cypress]

Unlike you I am not one of those people who is incapable of finding commonalities with those I despise. LOL

No, it's not a sincere attempt to find the truth; it's like you are in Kindergarten. You only cozy up to mentally unstable MAGA morons if you see it as an opportunity to dogpile me,

 

[Cypress]

or by a god.

yes thanks for agreeing.

I'm agnostic about why rational mathematical design and lawful organization is imprinted on physical reality. I don't know what it means, but it means something.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

I'm agnostic about why rational mathematical design and lawful organization is imprinted on physical reality. I don't know what it means, but it means something.

it means nothing.

you're a fucking idiot.

 

[Cypress]

it means nothing.

Feel free to wander the United States, and stop in at university physics departments to tell them it's meaningless to study the mathematics of energy and matter.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

Feel free to wander the United States, and stop in at university physics departments to tell them it's meaningless to study the mathematics of energy and matter.

I din't say that.

quit getting your cute little butterfly panties in a bunch.

 

[Cypress]

I din't say that.

Post 131: You stated that the rational mathematical design and lawful organization of the universe "means nothing".

I can only respond to the words you write.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

Post 131: You stated that the rational mathematical design and lawful order of the universe "means nothing".

I can only respond to the words you write.

no I didn't

you;re strawmanning again, queefy.

 

[Cypress]

no I didn't

Denying the words you write is a hallmark of mental illness.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

Denying the words you write is a hallmark of mental illness.

ok, queefy strawman.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

Denying the words you write is a hallmark of mental illness.

nothing is imprinted on reality.

you're still angling for a giver of numbers, just like you angle for a giver of morality.

you're a huckster and a theocratic menace to humanity.

 

[Cypress]

nothing is imprinted on reality.

you're still angling for a giver of numbers, just like you angle for a giver of morality.

you're a huckster and a theocratic menace to humanity.

You can't deny what you wrote -->

I'm agnostic about why rational mathematical design and lawful organization is imprinted on physical reality. I don't know what it means, but it means something.

it means nothing!

 

[Sammy Jankis]

You can't deny what you wrote.

you believe there's a "number giver" in the sky.

you're moronic.