disagree.
what may be the kicker is the naming associated with the annual flu treatment normally called "shot".
I do not believe its intended to behave as a vaccination. Its a mild infection intended to cue your immune system to grow it's own defense against the flu(s) projected to be rolling around this year (which they usually get wrong which is why flu shots are no better than 60% effective).
Vaccinations are different (as I understand it (but I am not an MD). They are intended to block the cootie as was seen with polio, measles etc. I suspect that the china cootie treatment is not, strictly speaking a vaccination neither is it a flu shot targeting the china cootie but something different. That would explain it's hit and miss track record (based on the human testing having been done on the public at large as opposed to scientifically).
Once again I think that if "science" had been more honest from the start expectations would have been better managed.
Now they likely had little choice as the stakes were driven wildly up by politics.
Moral of the story: honesty is the best policy
Completely wrong. You know what would have helped? If you would have taken the time to look up the fucking definition of vaccine.
https://www.google.com/search?q=vac...2l3j0i512l5.3727j0j9&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Get off your lazy ass and learn something