Are we all now pro government regulation?

evince

evince

Truthmatters
Or is it being talked about just to defray blame on the party who had control for the last eigth years?
 
So I guess that means you are not pro gov regs on the markets?

Then you should be praising everyone who voted for GLB act 1999 instaed of blaming them huh?
 
I think all along, most intelligent individuals were never for NO regulation, just the right regulation. Something that didn't get done because of people like waxman and frank
 
You guys refuse to face the fact that every time regulations need to be made the conservatives fight them and say its too much government control over the market.

So the whole Clinton signing it mess just proves no Democrat should ever trust an R to deregulate anything honsetly.

You can have Clinton.

Fuck him and his far too moderate fiscal policy.
 
evince said:
You guys refuse to face the fact that every time regulations need to be made the conservatives fight them and say its too much government control over the market.

So the whole Clinton signing it mess just proves no Democrat should ever trust an R to deregulate anything honsetly.

You can have Clinton.

Fuck him and his far too moderate fiscal policy.
Click to expand...

And too much government involvement always leads to abuse by interested parties. That's what you won't face.
 
evince said:
You guys refuse to face the fact that every time regulations need to be made the conservatives fight them and say its too much government control over the market.

So the whole Clinton signing it mess just proves no Democrat should ever trust an R to deregulate anything honsetly.

You can have Clinton.

Fuck him and his far too moderate fiscal policy.
Click to expand...

I love that even though Clinton and Rubin were pushing for this they are somehow the 'victims' because they 'trusted' the plan Congress (which included heavy Democratic support) gave them. They of course didn't do any research of their own or have any idea of what they were signing into law.
 
evince said:
You guys refuse to face the fact that every time regulations need to be made the conservatives fight them and say its too much government control over the market.

So the whole Clinton signing it mess just proves no Democrat should ever trust an R to deregulate anything honsetly.

You can have Clinton.

Fuck him and his far too moderate fiscal policy.
Click to expand...

From your NYTimes article:

""Supporters of the companies said efforts to regulate the lenders tightly under those agencies might diminish their ability to finance loans for lower-income families. This year, however, the chances of passing legislation to tighten the oversight are better than in the past.""

Supporters in this case of course referring to Democrats fighting against stricter regulations. How about them apples?
 
I'm so for right regulation I want to kick a democrats ass if someone doesn't go to jail over this. Evence/desh if you don't think dems are at least 40 percent responsible. Then your more stupid than you sounded in the machine fraud that didn't includemachines post. Maxims waters a year ago said fanny was great and needed no change. She's a dumb bitch too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top