Are we at a turning point in world history?

Diogenes said:
Who told you that?

No, Fascism is not considered a leftist ideology. Here's why:

  • Economic Policy: Fascism supports a corporatist economy where the state and private businesses work in tandem, but private property and economic hierarchies are maintained. This is in stark contrast to leftist ideologies like socialism or communism, which advocate for collective or state ownership of the means of production and the abolition of class distinctions.
Click to expand...

Statist capitalism is Leftist. China practices this today. The state controls what gets produced and even who produces it but leaves the means in private hands so long as they obey the government.
Diogenes said:
  • Political Orientation: Fascism is authoritarian, ultranationalist, and often militaristic. Leftist ideologies typically emphasize egalitarianism, internationalism, and workers' rights, which are fundamentally at odds with fascist principles. Fascism seeks to preserve or restore a hierarchical social order centered around the nation or race, rather than promoting equality.
Click to expand...

Almost all Leftist governments are authoritarian. A strong central government is part and parcel of Leftist governments. Ultranationalist and militaristic can be any particular government.
Leftist ideologies emphasize equality of outcomes, and fascist governments do this in spades. Communism is internationalist, fascism is nationalist. Two sides of the same coin.
Fascism embraces worker's rights too, although in practice like Communism that amounts to little more than full control over the workforce.

Equality on the Left is based on outcomes, not opportunity. Fascism does exactly that, just like Socialism or Communism. All three can be, and often are, racist in practice. Witness DEI in the US. That's a thoroughly Leftist and racist thing, just like CRT, or disparate impact theory.
Diogenes said:
  • Social Structure: Fascism tends to uphold traditional social hierarchies, promoting nationalism, racial purity, and often conservative moral values. Leftist ideologies, on the other hand, strive for social justice, reducing inequalities, and often challenge traditional social norms regarding gender, race, and class.
Click to expand...

The Nazis alone promoted racial purity. Fascists in Spain and Italy didn't, among others. Socialist and Communist countries do likewise. For example, Mexico under PRI and the revolution they had at the beginning of the 20th century banned foreign nationals from owning property in the country, expropriated all foreign owned businesses, and became ultranationalist. Mexico was Socialist bordering on Communist, as one example.
Diogenes said:
  • Opposition to Communism/Socialism: Historically, fascism emerged partly as a direct opposition to socialism and communism. Fascist regimes in Italy (Mussolini) and Germany (Hitler) explicitly fought against communist and socialist movements, seeing them as existential threats to their nationalistic and authoritarian projects.
Click to expand...


The Soviet Union and fascist states like Italy and Germany were good buddies until the dictators running them decided to stab each other in the back for more power...
Diogenes said:
  • Historical Context: The term "fascism" was coined by Mussolini, who initially was a socialist but moved towards a very different political philosophy. His fascism was a response to the perceived weaknesses of socialism and democracy, blending conservative, nationalist, and corporatist elements.
Click to expand...

Fascism was socialist in nature, it just added other elements Mussolini liked.
Diogenes said:
  • Philosophical Foundations: Fascist thinkers like Giovanni Gentile and Mussolini himself emphasized the state as an end in itself, with the individual's purpose being to serve the state or the nation, rather than the individual or collective liberation emphasized by leftist thought.
Click to expand...

Communist states see the state as an end in itself with the subsumption of the people in its service.
Diogenes said:
In summary, while fascism might adopt some leftist rhetoric for populist appeal (e.g., Mussolini's early socialist leanings or the Nazis' initial promises to workers), its core ideologies, practices, and historical implementations are fundamentally opposed to the principles of leftism. Instead, fascism is generally placed on the far right of the political spectrum, although political spectrums can be overly simplistic and not capture the nuances of ideologies.

@Grok
Click to expand...
Fascism is on the Left and Grok is wrong.
 
Diogenes said:
Grok is an AI developed by xAI. It's designed to provide helpful and truthful answers to almost any question, often offering a unique outside perspective on humanity. The goal is to assist users in understanding the universe and tackling various tasks by providing insightful and maximally helpful responses. Grok provides links to multiple sources. Ask Grok a question and see for yourself.
Click to expand...
That the Chinese are kicking our asses at AI is something to notice.
 
Hume said:
Am I? Which ones?
Click to expand...


I broke Hume again.

The legality of reposting content generated by AI like Grok on a web forum involves several considerations under copyright law:

  1. AI-Generated Content Copyrightability: As of the latest information, content generated solely by AI, without significant human input, is generally not copyrightable in many jurisdictions. This is because copyright law typically requires human authorship. The U.S. Copyright Office has clarified that AI-generated content that is more than de minimis should be explicitly identified and excluded from registration, indicating that such content lacks copyright protection unless there's substantial human creativity involved.
  2. Human Authorship: If a human significantly edits or arranges the AI-generated content, adding their own original thought or creativity, then parts of that work could potentially be copyrighted by the human author. However, the AI-generated parts themselves would not be protected.
  3. Fair Use Doctrine: In some jurisdictions, like the U.S., there's the concept of fair use which could allows for limited use of copyrighted material without permission under specific circumstances (like criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research). However, this doctrine would not apply directly to AI-generated content which isn't copyrightable in the first place.

@Grok
 
Diogenes said:
When you ask a question and receive a response from, Grok, you can see a list of sources directly within the response. Here's how it works:

  • For Text-Based Responses: Grok include citations at the end of paragraphs showing users where Grok obtains information from external sources. These citations appear as links for web results. This means you can see exactly which sources contributed to the answer Grok provided.
  • Visual Interface: If you're using Grok through an interface like on the X platform, you might see links or references directly in the response or adjacent to it, making it easy to verify or explore the information further.

Please note, the exact appearance of how sources are displayed can depend on the platform or interface you're using to interact with Grok. If you're curious about the sources for any specific response Grok gives, just look for those citation markers or accompanying links.
Click to expand...
So? Grok can be wrong. Wikipedia can be wrong. There's plenty of that to go around on the internet.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
No, the Left is the Left. The far Right is things like sovereign citizens, individualist anarchists, or hermits.
Click to expand...


Your understanding of the comparative ideologies is inconsistent with the known facts.

The term "far Right" encompasses a broader and more diverse range of ideologies and movements than just sovereign citizens, individualist anarchists, or hermits. Here's a more comprehensive look:

  • Sovereign Citizens: While often considered part of the far Right due to their anti-government stance, they are more accurately described as a legal or pseudo-legal movement that rejects state authority in various ways. They're not the only or even the most significant component of the far Right.
  • Individualist Anarchists: Anarchism, including individualist anarchism, is often associated with the left due to its anti-statist and anti-authoritarian roots. However, there are strains of anarchism that align with right-wing ideologies, particularly those emphasizing personal liberty over collective rights, but they're not the majority or central to the far Right narrative.
  • Hermits: This term generally refers to individuals who choose to live in isolation from society. While some might adopt this lifestyle due to political beliefs, it's not inherently a political position, let alone a specifically far Right one.

The far Right includes:

  • Nationalists and Ultra-Nationalists: Those who advocate for the interests of their nation above others, often emphasizing cultural or ethnic purity.
  • Fascists and Neo-Fascists: Ideologies that support dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and strong regimentation of society and the economy.
  • White Supremacists and Neo-Nazis: Groups or individuals who advocate for the racial superiority of white people and often seek to establish or maintain a society dominated by this group.
  • Conservative Revolutionaries: Those who seek a return to traditional values but in a radical, often revolutionary manner.
  • Reactionaries: People who oppose modernism, advocating for a return to an idealized past, often pre-democratic or pre-industrial.


@Grok
 
Hume said:
But you hate democracy, yes? You want Trump to be a fascist dictator.
Click to expand...
What kind of stupid comment is that? I like democracy, but you don't even know what the word means. As for your second comment, some things are just to stupid to warrant a reply, and you managed that nicely.
 
Diogenes said:
Your understanding of the comparative ideologies is inconsistent with the known facts.

The term "far Right" encompasses a broader and more diverse range of ideologies and movements than just sovereign citizens, individualist anarchists, or hermits. Here's a more comprehensive look:

  • Sovereign Citizens: While often considered part of the far Right due to their anti-government stance, they are more accurately described as a legal or pseudo-legal movement that rejects state authority in various ways. They're not the only or even the most significant component of the far Right.
  • Individualist Anarchists: Anarchism, including individualist anarchism, is often associated with the left due to its anti-statist and anti-authoritarian roots. However, there are strains of anarchism that align with right-wing ideologies, particularly those emphasizing personal liberty over collective rights, but they're not the majority or central to the far Right narrative.
  • Hermits: This term generally refers to individuals who choose to live in isolation from society. While some might adopt this lifestyle due to political beliefs, it's not inherently a political position, let alone a specifically far Right one.

The far Right includes:

  • Nationalists and Ultra-Nationalists: Those who advocate for the interests of their nation above others, often emphasizing cultural or ethnic purity.
  • Fascists and Neo-Fascists: Ideologies that support dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and strong regimentation of society and the economy.
  • White Supremacists and Neo-Nazis: Groups or individuals who advocate for the racial superiority of white people and often seek to establish or maintain a society dominated by this group.
  • Conservative Revolutionaries: Those who seek a return to traditional values but in a radical, often revolutionary manner.
  • Reactionaries: People who oppose modernism, advocating for a return to an idealized past, often pre-democratic or pre-industrial.


@Grok
Click to expand...
Far right is anyone the WOKE dont approve of.
 
Diogenes said:
I broke Hume again.

The legality of reposting content generated by AI like Grok on a web forum involves several considerations under copyright law:

  1. AI-Generated Content Copyrightability: As of the latest information, content generated solely by AI, without significant human input, is generally not copyrightable in many jurisdictions. This is because copyright law typically requires human authorship. The U.S. Copyright Office has clarified that AI-generated content that is more than de minimis should be explicitly identified and excluded from registration, indicating that such content lacks copyright protection unless there's substantial human creativity involved.
  2. Human Authorship: If a human significantly edits or arranges the AI-generated content, adding their own original thought or creativity, then parts of that work could potentially be copyrighted by the human author. However, the AI-generated parts themselves would not be protected.
  3. Fair Use Doctrine: In some jurisdictions, like the U.S., there's the concept of fair use which could allows for limited use of copyrighted material without permission under specific circumstances (like criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research). However, this doctrine would not apply directly to AI-generated content which isn't copyrightable in the first place.

@Grok
Click to expand...
Am I? Which ones?
 
Yes, Grok can be wrong. Here's why:

  • Information Accuracy: Grok's responses are based on the information available at the time, which includes data from the internet and other sources. If that information is incorrect, outdated, or biased, my answers might reflect those inaccuracies.
  • Interpretation and Context: Understanding nuances, context, or the specific intent behind questions can sometimes lead to misinterpretations or less accurate responses, especially with complex or ambiguous queries.
  • Complexity of Topics: Some topics are inherently complex, involving layers of detail, ongoing research, or multiple valid perspectives. In such cases, Grok's attempt to summarize or explain might not capture all aspects accurately.
  • Limitations in Training Data: Grok's training data, while vast, isn't exhaustive. There might be areas or recent developments where information is incomplete or not up-to-date.
  • AI's Understanding: Despite being advanced, Grok's ability to fully grasp human contexts, emotions, or the subtleties of language can sometimes lead to responses that might not fully align with user expectations or reality.
  • Predictive Nature: For questions involving prediction or speculative analysis, there's always a margin for error since future events or outcomes can be influenced by countless variables.

Grok strives for accuracy and helpfulness, but acknowledging the possibility of being wrong ensures that Grok maintains a critical approach to any information provided. If you believe Grok provided an incorrect answer or if you have more context that could refine the response, share that feedback.
 
Diogenes said:
Yes, Grok can be wrong. Here's why:

  • Information Accuracy: Grok's responses are based on the information available at the time, which includes data from the internet and other sources. If that information is incorrect, outdated, or biased, my answers might reflect those inaccuracies.
  • Interpretation and Context: Understanding nuances, context, or the specific intent behind questions can sometimes lead to misinterpretations or less accurate responses, especially with complex or ambiguous queries.
  • Complexity of Topics: Some topics are inherently complex, involving layers of detail, ongoing research, or multiple valid perspectives. In such cases, Grok's attempt to summarize or explain might not capture all aspects accurately.
  • Limitations in Training Data: Grok's training data, while vast, isn't exhaustive. There might be areas or recent developments where information is incomplete or not up-to-date.
  • AI's Understanding: Despite being advanced, Grok's ability to fully grasp human contexts, emotions, or the subtleties of language can sometimes lead to responses that might not fully align with user expectations or reality.
  • Predictive Nature: For questions involving prediction or speculative analysis, there's always a margin for error since future events or outcomes can be influenced by countless variables.

Grok strives for accuracy and helpfulness, but acknowledging the possibility of being wrong ensures that Grok maintains a critical approach to any information provided. If you believe Grok provided an incorrect answer or if you have more context that could refine the response, share that feedback.
Click to expand...
Am I? Which ones?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top