Gotcha68
Verified User
Passive-aggressive much?
People leaving Congress is a good thing, IMO. I'd like to see more of it.
Not passive-aggressive at all. Truth. I am relieved.
Passive-aggressive much?
People leaving Congress is a good thing, IMO. I'd like to see more of it.
Facts aren't straws.
Were you upset to discover 22 million deleted emails by Bush and Co.?
I'm not surprised that there are some Republicans who are not devoted to Trump, I'm relieved. Proof that, while I may not support a Republican president over all when they win an election, I can still support the process because there are still Republicans who also support the process. You all aren't the deplorables you try so desperately to portray yourselves as. Good for you.
Maybe they should have been.
A majority were recovered for one. Second, what does it have to do with this thread?
He was presenting a moral equivalence , dumbass.
If I need someone to drool all over themselves with stupidity I will call you. Until then, go sit in the corner.
A majority were recovered for one. Second, what does it have to do with this thread?
Ok, let’s judge Mueller’s investigation on its merits, thus far lol.
Thus far, Mueller gets a C- for scoring a couple process crime indictments THAT HAD NOTHING TO DO with his mandate.
And I’m being generous.
The delicious irony is that, thus far, all the corruption has been exposed on the fricking investigators!
Like I said in another thread, Putin has to be laughing his ass off. And not at or because of Trump.
He was presenting a moral equivalence , dumbass.
And there is none they weren't under subpoena and most if not all were recovered there was no Mens Rea unlike the bleach bit used and the devices smashed with hammers demonstrating criminal intent to permanently destroy evidence.
Hillary's deleted emails manage to find their way into just about every thread so I included other deleted emails. The fact that they may have been recovered is beside the damn point. Seriously?
Also, these threads wander all over the damn place so I think I'm comfortable introducing what ever the hell I want into one. Thanks for your question though. Way to stay alert.
Assumed intellectual superiority ain't your forte, is it oarsman.
fuck off retard. This is a free speech forum, and us mods are able to conduct ourselves however we wish. We don't hold ourselves to some bullshit arbitrary moral standard.
You're talking about the investigation like you know what the evidence is, and what their conclusions will be.
I think that's been the issue all along. Some think that investigations are these wide open kinds of things, where we know every fact & development as soon as the investigators do. That's not how it works, or how it should work.
You've somehow managed to up your syllable count. Have a go at punctuation.
The FBI LEADERSHIP ( so called 7th floor) are corrupt. Look at the demotions already.
Page
Strozk
Baker
Ribyiki (sp?)
McCabe..
virtually every time we talk about 'FBI corruption' -it's said as "FBI leadership"
Thing's OP doesn't separate it out -but nobody has any problems with the so called 'rank and file' agents.
Hopefully Thing ( and others) stop the conflation about "discrediting the FBI"
Are we better off with a discredited FBI?