Assange: leaks disgusting

i'm 5 years old and still smarter than you

next

Not the most mature five year old I have ever met, but you are a yank, so I suppose one must take that into consideration.
Keep up the good work, Yurt.
 
I don't understand what Assange is upset about. If anything, the leak supports his assertion of mudslinging.

One women he supposedly "sexually surprised" (As Jon Stewart said isn't all sex a surprise?!!) kept sleeping with him for an additional 5 days/week.

Something doesn't add up here.

The two women only got pissed off when they discovered he had slept with both of them, up to that point they were happy. Seems like a classic case of revenge.
 
how is it you know all this for a fact?

Both women were upset that he, Assange, had sex with them without a condem. They became much more upset when they discovered that he had done it to both of them: With one, the condem broke while they were having sex and the woman tried to stop him...but good ol' hero Assange continued on to climax. With the second woman he penetrated her while she was asleep minus a condem. (they had had consenual sex with a condem the night before) I am not familar with Swedish law...but it appears at the very least he's a pig of the highest order.

Discovering that Assange has a pattern of indifference (not protecting them) towards the women he is sexually active with is not equal to them "seeking revenge". It is more like "that bastard someone needs to stop him!"
 
Sex accusers boasted about their 'conquest' of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange

Political Bastards
The Times of India 11/12/2010 19:22

4124.jpg


Anna Ardin and Sophia Wilen boasted of their sexual conquest of Julian Assange

The two Swedish women who have brought sex charges against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange boasted about their relationship with him days before going to police.

Based on information available on various websites quoting police and court files, and reports in the Swedish media, here's an account of what happened.

The story goes back to August this year, when Assange was in Stockholm to speak at the invitation of Sweden's Social Democratic Party.

The event organizer was 31-year-old Anna Ardin, press secretary of the Brotherhood Movement, which is an adjunct of the Social Democratic Party. Ardin, who has been described as a feminist, leftist and animal rights activist, previously worked at the Uppsala University, handling equality issues for the students' union. (After pressing charges against Assange, she has been called a "CIA agent" on various blogs and Twitter. The internet is abuzz with conspiracy theories on how Assange was framed. Speculation about her ties to CIA is being fuelled by her alleged association with anti-Castro groups funded by the US.)

When Assange arrived in Stockholm on August 11, Ardin invited him to stay at her flat while she visited her family for a few days out in the country. Ardin returned home on August 13; she and Assange had sex that night. Both have admitted a condom was used and it broke. On August 20, Ardin would go to police alleging that Assange deliberately broke the condom during sex.

Ardin's co-accuser, 26-year-old Sofia Wilen, an aspiring photographer, had sex with Assange on the evening of August 16 and again the following morning. The first time, a condom was used; the second time, there was no condom. On August 20, Wilen would go to police alleging that Assange had refused to wear a condom.

Assange insists that the sex with both women was consensual. After the sexual encounters, neither woman seemed to harbour any resentment against Assange. One of Assange's lawyers has been quoted as saying: "The exact content of Wilen's mobile phone texts is not yet known but their bragging and exculpatory character has been confirmed by Swedish prosecutors. Neither Wilen's nor Ardin's texts complain of rape."

On August 14, the day following the night of "crime", Assange delivered a 90-minute speech about how the first casualty of war is truth. Ardin was in attendance (as was Wilen) but showed no signs of the previous night's "trauma". The two women can be seen in a video of the conference . At 2 o'clock that night, while hosting a party in Assange's honour at her flat, Ardin tweeted: "Sitting outside; nearly freezing; with the world's coolest people; it's pretty amazing."

After going to police on August 20, she deleted the tweet. The post deleted from annaardin.bloggy.se and twitter.com/annaardin can still be seen on this cached page . After sex with Assange on the morning of August 17, Wilen went out, and bought, then cooked breakfast — oatmeal and juice.

On August 18, Wilen called up Ardin and told her that she had unprotected sex with Assange. She said she was upset he didn't use a condom and was afraid she might have contracted an STD or become pregnant. Ardin said she too had sex with Assange. On August 20, both women filed charges against him.

And an obscure Swedish law was invoked. It is sometimes called the "surprise sex" law. In essence, it holds that if a woman withdraws her consent at any point during intercourse, and the man continues, it becomes rape. This transition from consensual to non-consensual sex is what Assange is accused of. All this will have to be proved in the court — a Swedish one.

One thing, however, is certain: the word "rape" has come to stick to Assange's name and his creation, WikiLeaks. A Google search for "wikileaks rape" returns 3.09 million results. But will this association deliver a blow to the idea that is WikiLeaks?

Just a day after the two women went to police to file charges against Assange, Nicholas John Mead, a British freelance journalist, wrote on his blog : "Whether this is an orchestrated smear campaign, just two very silly girls, or a genuine case of rape and harassment, the fact is that WikiLeaks is bigger than Assange as he I'm sure would be the first to admit. It, and other projects like it, cannot be stopped."
 
Last edited:
amazing how tom loves smearing the alleged rape victims and posting their pics all over the interwebs....

but when i say the US did not condone the disgusting act of child rape, it means i support and condone child rape

all you're posting is hearsay nonsensical speculation, even your hero michael moore toned his shit down and said the rape accusations should be taken serious
 
amazing how tom loves smearing the alleged rape victims and posting their pics all over the interwebs....

but when i say the US did not condone the disgusting act of child rape, it means i support and condone child rape

all you're posting is hearsay nonsensical speculation, even your hero michael moore toned his shit down and said the rape accusations should be taken serious

Note too the only "evidence" so far to support Tom's version of events is Assange's attorney's speculation.
 
Not cool-I agree.

its one thing to dispute the allegations, but he has taken it to a disgustingly low level by repeatedly posting their pictures and smears based on pure speculation

if its found out they lied, post all the pics you want, but until then, there is no need to harrass the women constantly
 
amazing how tom loves smearing the alleged rape victims and posting their pics all over the interwebs....

but when i say the US did not condone the disgusting act of child rape, it means i support and condone child rape

all you're posting is hearsay nonsensical speculation, even your hero michael moore toned his shit down and said the rape accusations should be taken serious

Yurty yurty yurty. Calm down, sonny. Neither of the women actually said the word rape. The word was used by the press in whose interest it is to sell newspapers and advertisements not to print the truth.

The truth will be revealed in the years to come and I would hazard a guess that your own CIA is behind the smears and accusations. It is almost certain that they (or your government) pressured our silly schoolboy PM, to turn the heat up. After all it is easy to persuade an old Etonian. Their 'fags' know everything and will sing for a double Martini.

It is quite funny to watch you and the other half brains desperately trying to try him and hang him to satisfy their own dismal failings. Your life must be quite a disappointment to you.
Grow up, go back to school, find something worthwhile to do with your miserable existence.
 
Yurty yurty yurty. Calm down, sonny. Neither of the women actually said the word rape. The word was used by the press in whose interest it is to sell newspapers and advertisements not to print the truth.

The truth will be revealed in the years to come and I would hazard a guess that your own CIA is behind the smears and accusations. It is almost certain that they (or your government) pressured our silly schoolboy PM, to turn the heat up. After all it is easy to persuade an old Etonian. Their 'fags' know everything and will sing for a double Martini.

It is quite funny to watch you and the other half brains desperately trying to try him and hang him to satisfy their own dismal failings. Your life must be quite a disappointment to you.
Grow up, go back to school, find something worthwhile to do with your miserable existence.

you're a funny joke...i have repeatedly said i don't know if he is guilty or not...

do continue your dishonest blathering, i suppose you'll sleep better after having mindlessly ranted meadowmuffins while pounding on your keyboard - which is your weekly exercise

:)
 
its one thing to dispute the allegations, but he has taken it to a disgustingly low level by repeatedly posting their pictures and smears based on pure speculation

if its found out they lied, post all the pics you want, but until then, there is no need to harrass the women constantly

Do you really think I give a flying fuck for the opinion of a Yank ambulance chaser?
 
The two women only got pissed off when they discovered he had slept with both of them, up to that point they were happy. Seems like a classic case of revenge.

As the old saying goes, "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned."

In deference to Mr. Assange who insists on accuracy the exact quote is "Heaven has no rage like love to hatred turned / Nor hell a fury like a woman scorned."

Is there a man alive today who doesn't know that? :lol:
 
Both women were upset that he, Assange, had sex with them without a condem. They became much more upset when they discovered that he had done it to both of them: With one, the condem broke while they were having sex and the woman tried to stop him...but good ol' hero Assange continued on to climax. With the second woman he penetrated her while she was asleep minus a condem. (they had had consenual sex with a condem the night before) I am not familar with Swedish law...but it appears at the very least he's a pig of the highest order.

Discovering that Assange has a pattern of indifference (not protecting them) towards the women he is sexually active with is not equal to them "seeking revenge". It is more like "that bastard someone needs to stop him!"

"With the second woman he penetrated her while she was asleep minus a condom."

Is that really possible? I've heard of people being in a deep sleep but that stretches credulity.
 
Back
Top