At What Point?

I'll start by saying that although I'm not a Christian, I'm also not an atheist.
We all know. You worship at the altar of Global Warming and Climate Change. You haven't exactly kept your faith a big secret.

I've always wondered what it is about us humans that sparks most of us to believe in a creator or god(s), in some being(s) responsible for the existence of both us and of the Universe.
Because we all seek justice, and your ilk presumes that Climate will administer Climate Justice, always in 13 years, or in 30 years, or at the end of the century, to all the carbon sinners who rape her on a daily basis with their SUVs.

Your religion accounts for the stupidest and most dishonest people on the planet.

Even if we don't believe in a soul or an afterlife of some sort, still the suspicion persists that all of this couldn't have just happened. Why?
That's mostly due to your church's HATRED for math, science, logic and economics. Your Marxist family of faiths is all you have.
 
Hey, I can put you on ignore. Would you like that?
My vote is that you put him on ignore, i.e. tip your king. Then I can milk it by mocking you for a month.

Losers and totally insecure morons think that the threat of putting someone on ignore is substantive enough to bully people.
 
I'm a recovered Christian [circa age 13] and an atheist.
Nope. You worship Global Warming. That alone precludes atheism.


I also believe that this all could have (and did) just happen.
What? You think "this all" just happened recently? Everybody believes that "this all" happened, and it could not have happened if it could not have happened. Why do you think it just happened as opposed to happening an extremely long time ago?

If the universe is indeed infinite, every that's physically possible to exist probably exists an infinite number of times.
How did you establish this probability?
 
Where did I say "the best form of Christianity"? Copy and paste my words.

AGAIN the irony is "bible believing" Christians who believe something thats not in the bible. I merely painted out scripture actually reached the opposite

The reformation was based on a perversion. That's just how it is.
we don't blame you for being perverted......it was a long time ago and you have changed........
 
The corruption is what first teed up Luther. But he also started making the case that a lot of what the Roman Catholic church believed and practiced wasn't based on anything in the bible: i.e., most of the sacraments, the celibacy requirements of the clergy, only allowing the bible to be written and read in Latin by the priestly class, clerical hierarchy and veneration of saints, salvation occurring through a combination of the sacramental obligations, works, and faith
like a said, the Catholics have fixed most of their mistakes......only a few meaningless things, like transubstantiation remain......
 
LMAO the church never prohibited it's members from reading the bible. I thought that level of stupidity about the church went away with the world is flat but apparently not.
seriously......did you think the common man in the street spoke or read Latin?.....
 
And a combination of archeological evidence, and independent first century literary sources outside the Christian canon support that Pontius Pilate, John the Baptist, Jesus of Nazareth, and his brother James were real historical figures
Nope. One must first have a religious faith/belief that ... John the Baptist, Jesus of Nazareth, and his brother James were real historical figures. It isn't wrong to do so, but it is a matter of faith, not any sort of objective truth. There is otherwise no independent historical accounts of either John the Baptist, Jesus of Nazareth/Galilee/Bethlehem, and his brother James from the time period of their supposed lifetimes. There are only a paltry few references to biblical characters well after (decades) those biblical characters were written, which was well after (decades) their supposed lifetimes.

Hence the faith requirement.
 
Back
Top