APP - Atlas Shrugged: stupid book

Damocles said:
So, you have no link to "all these libertarians" is what I am hearing. They are all in your imagination.
Click to expand...
every thread on this forum nearly has a libertarian being a globalist asshat who won't answer direct questions.

what's the libertarian take on banker bailouts?

yeah. can't answer because in reality libertarians suck banker cock.
 
Lao Tse said:
every thread on this forum nearly has a libertarian being a globalist asshat who won't answer direct questions.

what's the libertarian take on banker bailouts?
Click to expand...
In your mind is everyone a "libertarian" if they aren't you? I see no posts celebrating the libertarian "cred" of folks that take gub'mint money. Other than posts with you complaining about "all those libertarians everywhere" doing things you don't like.
 
Damocles said:
In your mind is everyone a "libertarian" if they aren't you? I see no posts celebrating the libertarian "cred" of folks that take gub'mint money. Other than posts with you complaining about "all those libertarians everywhere" doing things you don't like.
Click to expand...
are you a libertarian?

what's your take on banker bailouts?
 
Ayn Rand was a Rothschild whore.

:truestory:

literally she had an affair with a rothschild.

she's literally a banker cocksucker.
 
Lao Tse said:
do you support them?
Click to expand...
I don't support any use of stolen funds as immoral. All known government bailouts have been with stolen wealth (wealth from taxes or money printing).

I also don't support as a practical matter keeping a business model alive by donations regularly. If a business model does not turn a profit on average then it's reducing average prosperity not increasing it. It needs to be reorganized or abandoned.

For low risk high impact events I support occasional bailouts that are rare enough so that the average profit is still positive. There is a word for this kind of "bailout": insurance.
 
ADreamOfLiberty said:
I don't support any use of stolen funds as immoral. All known government bailouts have been with stolen wealth (wealth from taxes or money printing).

I also don't support as a practical matter keeping a business model alive by donations regularly. If a business model does not turn a profit on average then it's reducing average prosperity not increasing it. It needs to be reorganized or abandoned.

For low risk high impact events I support occasional bailouts that are rare enough so that the average profit is still positive. There is a word for this kind of "bailout": insurance.
Click to expand...
so you're for banker bailouts.

you;re a fascist.

a fake libertarian.
 
Damocles said:
In your mind is everyone a "libertarian" if they aren't you? I see no posts celebrating the libertarian "cred" of folks that take gub'mint money. Other than posts with you complaining about "all those libertarians everywhere" doing things you don't like.
Click to expand...
incorrect.

libertarians are people who talk a good game about laisser faire stuff, call themselves libertarians., but then are for banker bailouts.

I see lots of people who claim to be libertrarians but then are for fascism.
 
ADreamOfLiberty said:
I don't support any use of stolen funds as immoral. All known government bailouts have been with stolen wealth (wealth from taxes or money printing).

I also don't support as a practical matter keeping a business model alive by donations regularly. If a business model does not turn a profit on average then it's reducing average prosperity not increasing it. It needs to be reorganized or abandoned.

For low risk high impact events I support occasional bailouts that are rare enough so that the average profit is still positive. There is a word for this kind of "bailout": insurance.
Click to expand...
bailouts are with fake funds. printed out of thin air. and then put on every citizen as debt.

it's bullshit.

don't libertarians support sound currency?

or not anymore so you can suck banker cocks like ayn rand?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
This is wrong. Tesla is a product of the Green / environmental movement and government in collusion. Tesla would have failed decades ago without massive government subsidies and tax breaks. Today, government often chooses winners and losers in the marketplace and real innovators who run outside of that--the last big one was the PC revolution--are often left to die on the vine, even opposed, by government.


What does "Keynesian banker totalitarians" even mean?


Okay. What do you propose to put in their place?
Click to expand...
yes. elon musk is a fascist.

you know Keynesian banking is.

don't act dumb.

its a small group of people with the totalitarian power of money creation.

this corrupts all of capitalism at this juncture.

this is what it;s all about.

you;re probably on the wrong side of things.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top