Bailey Holt. 15. Say her name NRA.

Yes I am.
What does the NRA have to do with these murders?

The NRA lost sight of its original mission and became highly politicized. It used to be about safety, competency and marksmanship. Now they're just a huge lobby preying on conservative fears that guns will be outlawed. They push extremist views and refuse to meet anyone halfway.

The NRA never has a thing to say about innocent people being killed except "more guns." They helped create the gun culture here but never offer workable solutions to the problems arising from the culture. Problems like a 15-year old getting hold of a gun and shooting up his school.

If the NRA is going to turn a blind eye to these problems then prepare for the blame and backlash that follows.
 
Duh. That's exactly the point. She enabled her mentally-ill son to have full access to guns and lost her life over it.

You haven't called SmarterThanNobody sick for saying the blood of the Sandy Hook kids is on my hands.

Your double standards are sick and disgusting.

No she did not you sick liar. He broke into her gun safe and then killed her. I believe it was before, could be after, but it is a disgusting lie to claim she enabled him to ha e full access.

I have no double standards as I ha e not supported his contention, assure actually made it.
 
Ridiculous. The blood is on MRS. LANZA'S hands for allowing her mentally-ill son to have access to guns.



If I were trading insults with a woman I'd call her a "bitch", not a "son of a bitch." Apparently this subtlety of insult is lost on you.

I hadn't read where she ALLOWED it, can you point me to that evidence?

Plus: What NEW law would have prevented this?
 
Duh. That's exactly the point. She enabled her mentally-ill son to have full access to guns and lost her life over it.

You haven't called SmarterThanNobody sick for saying the blood of the Sandy Hook kids is on my hands.

Your double standards are sick and disgusting.

So now it went from ALLOWED to ENABLED.
So when anyone's children do something they shouldn't have, it's always the parents fault.
 
Duh. That's exactly the point. She enabled her mentally-ill son to have full access to guns and lost her life over it.

You haven't called SmarterThanNobody sick for saying the blood of the Sandy Hook kids is on my hands.

Your double standards are sick and disgusting.

So it is her fault that she loved her son and didn't believe he was a danger to anyone. And because she had a mentally ill child she should never have had firearms! My but aren't you a callous asshole.
 
Maybe christie believes the permission was implied because she didn't say not to take it.

And there it is; so which one was it Christie?

1 - Did she allow / enable him to have her gun; because she told him, why she was dying, that it was OK to have it?

or

2 - Did she allow / enable him to have her gun; because she didn't tell him, why she was dying, that he couldn't have it?

You all know she's not going to answer either of these; because it will show that she has no idea what she's complaining about.
 
And there it is; so which one was it Christie?

1 - Did she allow / enable him to have her gun; because she told him, why she was dying, that it was OK to have it?

or

2 - Did she allow / enable him to have her gun; because she didn't tell him, why she was dying, that he couldn't have it?

You all know she's not going to answer either of these; because it will show that she has no idea what she's complaining about.

What we do know that she doesn't have to answer in order to know is that she hates guns. Whether she answers or how she answer 1 or 2 is irrelevant as her motivation does not center around either question.
 
So it is her fault that she loved her son and didn't believe he was a danger to anyone. And because she had a mentally ill child she should never have had firearms! My but aren't you a callous asshole.

Yeah, dumbshit. If you have a mentally ill child, you don't keep firearms within easy access. That's a no-brainer, but obviously too much for yours.
 
Yeah, dumbshit. If you have a mentally ill child, you don't keep firearms within easy access. That's a no-brainer, but obviously too much for yours.

What information do you have that he had easy access to the gun or are you just running on emotions, at this time?
 
So it is her fault that she loved her son and didn't believe he was a danger to anyone. And because she had a mentally ill child she should never have had firearms! My but aren't you a callous asshole.

You're arguing from ignorance. Lanza's entire medical record shows what a disturbed individual he was. He first started writing down his violent fantasies in elementary school. By the time he shot up Sandy Hook he was obsessed with it.

Read the report before you make such stupid comments again.

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2014/images/11/21/office.of.the.child.advocate.report.pdf.pdf
 
What information do you have that he had easy access to the gun or are you just running on emotions, at this time?

I had a gun stolen out of my car a few years ago. The vehicle was locked, on private property, and the person stealing it didn't have permission to be there or a key to get into the vehicle. In other words, I made it difficult for them to get what the law says they shouldn't have taken. Those with the low mental capacity like domer still claimed I gave the thief easy access to the gun and didn't do enough to prevent it from being stolen.
 
Why don't you just tell me the pertinent pages like the nice person you are. And I will read them. Asking me to just read a 114 pages is unreasonable.

Read page 106 for the final statement. But you're not going to get the family history without reading the entire document, and that's what we're arguing about.
 
Back
Top